
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production

Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production
Abstract The experimental biochemical methane potentials (BMP) of typical food waste (FW) and straw from northern China were individually measured in a 1 L enclosed reactor at 35 °C, and were 0.26 and 0.16 m 3 /kg-VS (volatile solids), respectively. Lab-scale mixtures of different FW and straw composition were conducted with a total organic load of 5 g VS/L. The optimum mixing ratio of FW to straw appears to be close to 5:1, and the methane production yield (MPY) reached 0.392 m 3 /kg-VS, i.e., increased by 39.5% and 149.7% compared with individual digestion results, respectively. Moreover, the gas production (GP) and methane content was reaching 0.58 m 3 /kg-VS and 67.62%, respectively. Further study about the optimal straw particle size was explored, and the recommended size range of straw was 0.3–1 mm for the economical and energy-saving consideration.
- Beijing University of Chemical Technology China (People's Republic of)
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).265 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
