Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Renewable Energyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Renewable Energy
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production

Authors: Zihan Yong; Xu Zhang; Tianwei Tan; Yulin Dong;

Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production

Abstract

Abstract The experimental biochemical methane potentials (BMP) of typical food waste (FW) and straw from northern China were individually measured in a 1 L enclosed reactor at 35 °C, and were 0.26 and 0.16 m 3 /kg-VS (volatile solids), respectively. Lab-scale mixtures of different FW and straw composition were conducted with a total organic load of 5 g VS/L. The optimum mixing ratio of FW to straw appears to be close to 5:1, and the methane production yield (MPY) reached 0.392 m 3 /kg-VS, i.e., increased by 39.5% and 149.7% compared with individual digestion results, respectively. Moreover, the gas production (GP) and methane content was reaching 0.58 m 3 /kg-VS and 67.62%, respectively. Further study about the optimal straw particle size was explored, and the recommended size range of straw was 0.3–1 mm for the economical and energy-saving consideration.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    265
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
265
Top 0.1%
Top 1%
Top 1%