Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Chemical Engineering...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Energy and cost estimates for capturing CO2 from a dry flue gas using pressure/vacuum swing adsorption

Authors: Iftekhar A. Karimi; Jason Sue Teck Lim; Naresh Susarla; Lennon Soon Chong Tan; Arvind Rajendran; Reza Haghpanah; Shamsuzzaman Farooq;

Energy and cost estimates for capturing CO2 from a dry flue gas using pressure/vacuum swing adsorption

Abstract

Abstract Few energy/cost estimates exist in the literature for adsorption-based CO 2 capture. We study a pressure/vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) process using zeolite 13X for post-combustion capture of CO 2 from dry flue gas, and report useful insights into the effects of column dimensions and feed CO 2 concentration. We propose a configuration for a full-scale CO 2 capture and concentration plant for a 500 MW power plant, and then develop a mathematical programming formulation to minimize its total annualized cost (TAC). Our estimated TAC for capture from a 500 MW power plant flue gas with 15% CO 2 is US$33.4–40.3 per tonne of CO 2 avoided (US$30.4–36.7 per tonne of CO 2 captured). The key result is that the energy penalty for CO 2 capture amounts to less than 25% of TAC. Thus, using TAC as the design objective for a capture facility may be more appropriate than the popular choice of energy.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    74
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
74
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%