
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Energy and cost estimates for capturing CO2 from a dry flue gas using pressure/vacuum swing adsorption

Energy and cost estimates for capturing CO2 from a dry flue gas using pressure/vacuum swing adsorption
Abstract Few energy/cost estimates exist in the literature for adsorption-based CO 2 capture. We study a pressure/vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) process using zeolite 13X for post-combustion capture of CO 2 from dry flue gas, and report useful insights into the effects of column dimensions and feed CO 2 concentration. We propose a configuration for a full-scale CO 2 capture and concentration plant for a 500 MW power plant, and then develop a mathematical programming formulation to minimize its total annualized cost (TAC). Our estimated TAC for capture from a 500 MW power plant flue gas with 15% CO 2 is US$33.4–40.3 per tonne of CO 2 avoided (US$30.4–36.7 per tonne of CO 2 captured). The key result is that the energy penalty for CO 2 capture amounts to less than 25% of TAC. Thus, using TAC as the design objective for a capture facility may be more appropriate than the popular choice of energy.
- Nanyang Technological University Singapore
- National University of Singapore Singapore
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).74 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
