
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Discrimination between correlated and uncorrelated reinforcement in rats

Discrimination between correlated and uncorrelated reinforcement in rats
Abstract Twenty-four albino rats were tested in a two-lever situation in which one lever was associated with a condition of discontinuous negatively correlated reinforcement (reward for latency of 3.5 sec or longer), while response to the other lever was reinforced, regardless of latency, with a yoked frequency equal to that determined by the latencies on correlated-lever trials. Sixty-six acquisition, 15 extinction, and 10 reacquisition sessions were given, with 50% random reinforcement on each lever during reacquisition. In acquisition most of the rats showed eventual preference for the yoked-uncorrelated lever in terms of choices on two-lever trials and speeds on one-lever forced trials. An early preference for the correlated lever was displayed by over half of the rats and maintained over most of the acquisition period by the slowest-learning rats. Relative rate of extinction was essentially equal for the two levers. Historical effects of the acquisition conditions appeared with remarkable persistence in reacquisition.
- University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh United States
- University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh United States
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 1995IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
