
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Use of Commercial Enzymes to Boost On-Site Enzyme Efficiency
Use of Commercial Enzymes to Boost On-Site Enzyme Efficiency
In-house production of cellulases from filamentous fungi is widely used, but their hydrolytic efficiency compared to commercial enzymes is limited. We studied the effect of supplementing in-house cellulases produced by Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and a novel strain Aspergillus saccharolyticus with different types of commercial enzymes for the efficient hydrolysis of wet-exploded loblolly pine. Cellic®Ctec 2, Cellic®Htec2, and Novozym 188 were used as the commercial base enzymes for supplementing the in-house produced enzymes. Compared to non-supplemented in-house enzyme preparation, commercial enzymes (Cellic®Ctec2) added in the same amount as FPU and CBU resulted in 68 % higher glucose yield using wet-exploded loblolly pine (WELP) at a 20 % DM concentration. Highest saccharification yield was achieved by supplementation of the in-house produced cellulases with Cellic®Htec2 compared to Cellic®Ctec2 and Novozym 188. Optimal glucose, xylose, and mannose yields, 85 %, 92 %, and 86 %, respectively, were achieved by using in-house enzymes (15 FPU/g cellulose) supplemented with commercial hemicellulase (7.5 FPU/g cellulose). These results showed that supplementing in-house enzymes with commercial enzymes can be advantageous and work for lowering the overall cost of enzymes in a biorefinery.
- DuPont (United States) United States
- Black & Veatch United States
- DuPont (United States) United States
- Black & Veatch United States
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
