
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Performance of Spray, Sieve Tray, and Packed Contactors for High Pressure Extraction

Performance of Spray, Sieve Tray, and Packed Contactors for High Pressure Extraction
Abstract The performance of various contactors in high pressure extraction service was studied. The mass transfer efficiency of a spray column and columns filled with sieve trays, 1.27 cm ceramic Raschig rings, and no. 15 metal Intalox saddles were obtained from a “windowed” high pressure extraction column with an internal diameter of 9.88 cm and a column height of 168 cm. The extraction column has an internal diameter of 9.88 cm and a contacting height of 168 cm. Glass windows in the extractor allowed visual observation and photography. Supercritical and liquid carbon dioxide were used to extract isopropanol from water at pressures of 81 to 150 atmospheres and 297 to 318 [ddot]K. The sieve tray extractor yielded the highest mass transfer efficiency followed closely by Raschig rings and metal Intalox saddles. The spray column was by far the least efficient. The mass transfer efficiency was observed to be independent of the operating conditions studied in this work. Sauter mean drop diameters and dispersed...
- The University of Texas at Austin United States
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2008IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).15 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
