Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Engineering Structur...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Engineering Structures
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Interface role in composite RC beams with a light-weight concrete core and an ultra high-durability concrete skin

Authors: Eduardo Júlio; Rui Martins; T. Cordeiro; Hugo Costa; Hugo Costa; V. Almeida; R.N.F. Carmo; +1 Authors

Interface role in composite RC beams with a light-weight concrete core and an ultra high-durability concrete skin

Abstract

Abstract This present paper describes an experimental study focused on the influence of the interface strength, between the lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC) and the ultra-high durability concrete (UHDC), on the structural behavior of composite beams. The beams were produced with a new concept which consists of using an UHDC layer only in the cover, being the core produced with LWAC. The great benefit of using this ‘superskin’ is to apply UHDC only where it is greatly needed for durability purpose and not in the total cross section of the structural members, avoiding high cement consumption, which is important to reduce the environmental impact associated to cement production. Thirteen different beams were tested until bending – or shear – controlled failure, varying the type of interface between the LWAC core and the UHDC cover: i) smooth; b) rough; c) with steel connectors; and d) indented. Several slant shear tests (SST) were performed to evaluate the longitudinal shear strength of the LWAC-UHDC interfaces. The main goals of this study were: 1) to analyze if composite beams’ behavior is monolithic under load increasing, in both flexural an shear tests, i.e., to check for possible slip of the outer layer; 2) to evaluate the influence of the interface roughness and of UHDC cover on structural performance, and finally 3) to evaluate which is the most proper interface to produce this type of composite beams. The results show that the superskin greatly enhances the structural behavior of the beams and that an appropriate roughness is necessary at the interface between the two concretes, to make the proposed solution viable and reliable.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%