Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cleaner P...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Cleaner Production
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Expert assessments of emerging oil sands technologies

Authors: Heather L. MacLean; Jennifer M. McKellar; Joule A. Bergerson; Sylvia Sleep;

Expert assessments of emerging oil sands technologies

Abstract

Abstract Emerging oil sands technologies could influence industry-wide greenhouse gas emissions, however projecting future emissions is difficult due to limited public reporting of expected performance and deployment of emerging technologies. An expert elicitation was conducted to gauge how experts anticipate emerging in situ, surface mining and upgrading technologies will be deployed and perform compared to current technologies. All experts project the majority (60–98%) of in situ bitumen production in 2034 will be produced using current technologies or hybrid steam-solvent processes. Experts built boxplots to show how they project commercial projects employing emerging technologies would perform in 2034 compared to a current project employing steam-assisted gravity drainage. Across experts, the median reduction in steam-to-oil ratio for hybrid steam-solvent projects and current in situ projects employing process changes (e.g., better well placement) ranged from 3 to 30% and from 12 to 14%, respectively. Median projections from experts about the change in bitumen recovery rate compared to a current (2014) steam-assisted gravity drainage project ranged from 3 to 30% for hybrid steam-solvents and up to 15% for electro-thermal and in situ combustion projects. The responses show that a slight reduction in energy consumption from the adoption of hybrid steam-solvent processes is expected by experts. Experts projected that emerging in situ technologies, which have the largest potential for adoption, will be used primarily for accessing marginal resources and increasing overall production levels, rather than targeting greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Therefore, deployment of emerging technologies is not expected to contribute substantially to meeting greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets for the industry by 2034 under the regulatory conditions at the time of the elicitation, a key insight for policy makers.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%