Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Botanyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Botany
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Interspecific and intraspecific variations in water storage in epiphytic old forest foliose lichens

Authors: CoxsonDarwyn; GauslaaYngvar;

Interspecific and intraspecific variations in water storage in epiphytic old forest foliose lichens

Abstract

Cyanolichens ( Lobaria hallii , Lobaria retigera , Lobaria scrobiculata , Pseudocyphellaria anomala ) and cephalodial ( Lobaria pulmonaria ) and noncephalodial ( Platismatia glauca ) chlorolichens were sampled in dry open, mesic open, and mesic closed forests in central British Columbia. Specific thallus mass (STM), water-holding capacity (WHC), percent water content at saturation, and thickness of upper cortex, photobiont layer, and medulla plus lower cortex were measured. Whereas STM did not differ much between cyanolichens (9.8 ± 0.1 mg dry mass·cm–2) and chlorolichens (8.0 ± 0.1 mg dry mass·cm–2), cyanolichens had a WHC (20.3 ± 0.2 mg H2O·cm–2) that was nearly twice that of the chlorolichens (10.8 ± 0.2 mg H2O·cm–2). STM and WHC increased with light exposure at the studied sites, presumably as an acclimation to higher evaporation demands. Within species, WHC was strongly coupled to STM and increased substantially faster with STM in cyanolichens, compensating their inability to use humid air to restore photosynthesis. The photobiont layer was two times thicker in cyanolichens, whereas the thickest layer (the hydrophobic medulla) did not differ between cyanolichens and chlorolichens. Most interspecific variation (88.3%) in WHC could be accounted for in a multiple regression model where STM and photobiont to total thickness ratio were the most important independent variables. Photobionts thus play significant roles in the water economy of lichens.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    81
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
81
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%