
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Drag Reduction of Circular Cylinder using Square Disturbance Body at 600 Angle by 2D Numerical Simulation Unsteady-RANS
Drag Reduction of Circular Cylinder using Square Disturbance Body at 600 Angle by 2D Numerical Simulation Unsteady-RANS
Drag is an aerodynamic force that appears when the flow past the bluff body circular cylinder. Drag strongly influenced by the flow separation point. One of the ways reducing the drag force that is to control the flow by placing the disturbance body on the upstream side at a certain angle. Previous research has found at 60º angle of flow separation is faster than a single cylinder that produced greater drag. Therefore, this research was conducted to reduce the drag force on the corner with disturbance dimension variation. This research was carried out numerically using a FLUENT 6.3.26 CFD software in 2D unsteady viscous-RANS models Turbulence Model-Shear-Stress Transport (SST) k-ω in a narrow channel. The geometry is simulated in a circular cylinder as the main body and the square cylinder as a disturbance body being placed in front of the main body by s/D ratio. Dimensions of disturbance body varied at (s) 0,1; 0,2; 0,3; 0,4 dan 0,5 mm with a gap (δ=0,4mm). Reynolds number based on the diameter of the cylinder, ie ReD 2,32x104. The simulation results show that the transition flow on shifting 60º SDB angle for all SDB dimensional variations do not produce turbulent. The optimum condition for the drag force reduction is s/D = 0.008 about 48 %.
bepress|Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, bepress|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering, FOS: Mechanical engineering, INA-Rxiv|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering|Other Mechanical Engineering, bepress|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering|Other Mechanical Engineering, Engineering, INA-Rxiv|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering|Energy Systems, INA-Rxiv|Engineering, Other Mechanical Engineering, Energy Systems, bepress|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering|Energy Systems, INA-Rxiv|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering
bepress|Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, bepress|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering, FOS: Mechanical engineering, INA-Rxiv|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering|Other Mechanical Engineering, bepress|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering|Other Mechanical Engineering, Engineering, INA-Rxiv|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering|Energy Systems, INA-Rxiv|Engineering, Other Mechanical Engineering, Energy Systems, bepress|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering|Energy Systems, INA-Rxiv|Engineering|Mechanical Engineering
8 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
