
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Power flattening options for the ENHS (encapsulated nuclear heat source) core

Power flattening options for the ENHS (encapsulated nuclear heat source) core
Abstract The feasibility of power flattening while maintaining a nearly constant keff over the core life is assessed for the Encapsulated Nuclear Heat Source (ENHS). A couple of approaches are considered — using different fuel dimensions and using different enrichment levels across the core. Three new cores with flattened power distribution are successfully designed: Design-I uses different fuel rod diameters but uniform fuel composition; Design-II uses different fuel enrichment in the radial direction but uniform fuel rod dimensions; Design-III is similar to Design-II but uses enrichment splitting also in the axial direction. Relative to the reference ENHS core, the BOL peak-to-average channel power ratio is reduced from 1.50 to 1.15, 1.22 and 1.15 and the average discharge burnup increases by 8.5%, 27.9% and 41.2% for, respectively, Design-I, -II and -III. The corresponding burnup reactivity swings over 20 years of full power operation are 0.37%, 0.52% and 0.60% relative to 0.22% of the reference design. Design-II and -III have a negative coolant expansion reactivity defect while in the reference design this defect is positive. The radial power flattening increases the reactivity worth of the peripheral absorbers of the three new designs while the central absorber reactivity worth is reduced but their sum is nearly maintained. The newly designed cores have slightly more positive coolant void reactivity worth than the reference ENHS core.
- Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute Korea (Republic of)
- University of California, Berkeley United States
- Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute Korea (Republic of)
13 Research products, page 1 of 2
- 2011IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2010IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).5 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
