
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Separation of isomers by ultrafiltration using modified cyclodextrins

Separation of isomers by ultrafiltration using modified cyclodextrins
Abstract In order to improve selective inclusion of cyclodextrin (CD) and permeate flux, separation of structural isomers ( o -, m - and p -nitrophenols) and optical isomers ( d - and l -phenylalanines) were conducted using some modified α and β-CDs, glucosyl (G1)-, maltosyl (G2)-, hydroxy-propyl (HP)-, α- and β-CDs, according to the previously proposed separation method. Generally, rejections of the modified CD are more enhanced than parent α-CD and β-CD by YM1 (molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of 1000 Da), PLBC (MWCO of 3000 Da) and YM5 (MWCO of 5000 Da) membranes. The G2-β-CD and HP-β-CD are rejected perfectly by YM1 membrane. Rejections of the modified CDs by PLBC and YM5 membranes decrease by more than 20% of those of the YM1 membrane. The selectivities of p -nitrophenol to o - or m -nitrophenol are enhanced with more modified α-CDs by YM1 membrane than those of parent α-CD. The selectivities decrease the PLBC and YM-5 membranes sharply. However, no enhancement occurs in the selectivities with modified β-CDs. l -phenylalanine is included, which is stronger than d -phenylalanine with all modified β-CDs. Their selectivities are higher than that of the parent β-CD. We proposed a new recycle system of isomers separation based on these data to apply the method for practical use.
6 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2011IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).19 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
