
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Inter-reference gap distribution replacement
Inter-reference gap distribution replacement
We propose a novel replacement algorithm, called Inter-Reference Gap Distribution Replacement (IGDR), for set-associative secondary caches of processors. IGDR attaches a weight to each memory-block, and on a replacement request it selects the memory-block with the smallest weight for eviction. The time difference between successive references of a memory-block is called its Inter-Reference Gap (IRG). IGDR estimates the ideal weight of a memory-block by using the reciprocal of its IRG.To estimate this reciprocal, it is assumed that each memory-block has its own probability distribution of IRGs; from which IGDR calculates the expected value of the reciprocal of the IRG to use as the weight of the memory-block. For implementation, IGDR does not have the probability distribution; instead it records the IRG distribution statistics at run-time. IGDR classifies memory-blocks and records statistics for each class. It is shown that the IRG distributions of memory-blocks correlate their reference counts, this enables classifying memory-blocks by their reference counts. IGDR is evaluated through an execution-driven simulation. For ten of the SPEC CPU2000 programs, IGDR achieves up to 46.1% (on average 19.8%) miss reduction and up to 48.9% (on average 12.9%) speedup, over the LRU algorithm.
- University of Tokyo Japan
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2001IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2000IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).25 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
