Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Study of Co2 Residual Trapping In-Situ – Results from Push-Pull Experiments at Heletz (Israel) Pilot Co2 Injection Site

Authors: Saba Joodaki; Stanislav Levchenko; Alexandru Tatomir; Maryeh Hedayati; Martin Sauter; Yvonne Tsang; Chin-Fu Tsang; +11 Authors

Study of Co2 Residual Trapping In-Situ – Results from Push-Pull Experiments at Heletz (Israel) Pilot Co2 Injection Site

Abstract

At Heletz, Israel, pilot CO2 injection site two dedicated push-pull experiments have recently been carried out for quantifying the residual trapping in-situ and for comparing the results to values determined from core samples. The target reservoir has a total thickness of about 11m, located at a depth of 1.6 km. The first experiment, carried out in autumn 2016, is mainly based on hydraulic withdrawal tests before and after the creation of the residually trapped zone. In this experiment, the residually trapped zone was also created by fluid withdrawal. In the second test, carried out in summer-autumn 2017, the main characterization method was injection/withdrawal of water and partitioning tracers whose recovery with and without residually trapped CO2 in the formation was compared. In this second experiment the residually trapped zone was created by first injecting CO2 and then injecting water saturated with CO2 to push away the mobile CO2. In this presentation, the resulting estimates for CO2 residual trapping will be presented and the results from the two distinctly different field experiments compared to each other. Further, the respective uncertainties of the two different field testing approaches are discussed. Finally, the in-situ estimates are compared to estimates from laboratory measurements on rock cores, including their modeling with pore-network models.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average