Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Effectiveness of personal noise exposure measurement in the noisy workplace

Authors: Seichi Horie; Koko Takezawa; Koki Mori; Syoko Kawanami; Jinro Inoue;

Effectiveness of personal noise exposure measurement in the noisy workplace

Abstract

In Japan, the Working Environment Measurement Standards require employers to measure noise of working environment by two kinds of methods using a sound level meter (SLM) once every 6 months. A-Sampling method is to be measured equivalent continuous sound level for at least 10 min. B-Sampling method is to be performed close to workers at times when the sound level appeared highest. We perform the risk assessment based on the values of the field measurement. In the East Japan Railway Company, workers move around several workshops and use hand tools. Therefore, it is difficult to estimate the personal noise exposure using only an SLM. To compare dose measurement with the Japanese field measurement, we carried out dose measurements for inspection or repair workers using a Personal Noise Dose Meter (Type 4448; Brüel & Kjær). The results revealed that all sound levels using a dosimeter were less than 85 dBA, while the sound levels using an SLM were more than 90 dBA. In this case, the risk can be overestimated. Thus, we conclude that the Working Environment Measurement Standards should adopt the dose measurement.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average