• Energy Research
• 2021-2025close
• 16. Peace & justice close
• Netherlands Research Portal close

Interview Participant : Antônio Luiz da Silva GuabirabaLocation (Town/District/State/Country): Povoado Zé Calu, Ourolandia, Bahia, BrazilInterview Date: 11/05/2010Interview Language: PortuguesePhD Research Title Social Sustainability in Biodiesel Production: Brazil and Timor:LesteUniversity: University of Technology SydneyMain Researcher: Sarina KilhamSecondary Researchers (if Present): Catarina Camargo (2nd Researcher);Carla Costa do Nascimento (Community Liaison /Researcher); Ednilson Riberio Santos (Videographer)Fund source: Research partly funded by Australian Postgraduate Award and ETC Energy GrantVideo of Interview: YesAudio of Interview: YesParticipate to remain anonymous: NoGeneral Project Information: This was a qualitative transdisciplinary research project undertaken as part of PhD research by Sarina Kilham. The purpose of this research was to consider smallholder farmers participation in biodiesel schemes and the ways that biodiesel schemes have been incorporated into rural livelihoods. This study provides a way to bring smallholder farmers’ experiences to the fore in the biodiesel debate. I interviewed smallholder farmers participating in government led biodiesel schemes in Brazil and Timor-Leste. These two biodiesel schemes were chosen due to similarities between the rural development and social inclusion goals of each scheme. I used a transdisciplinary research approach that was problem-centred, collaborative and methodologically flexible. Through the application of Grounded Theory Method to the farmer informants’ narratives, I developed a novel conceptual framework titled the Autonomous Livelihood Framework. Archiving the data was approved by the University of Technology Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee - project protocol 2010-105A. Each farmer informant was explicitly asked about inclusion of their material in the databank and informed about the embargo periods imposed on the data. All data included in this dataset has been approved by the farmer participants. Each farmer informant was explicitly asked about inclusion of their material in the databank and informed about the embargo periods imposed on the data. The conditions on the data were designed as such:Embargo Period:(a) Transcriptions: available 5 years post-interview(b) Full audio: available 10 years post-interview(c) Full video: available 20 years post-interview

The dairy industry can be considered a contributor to biodiversity loss in Australia. To address this, many forms of governance can be enlisted, including traditional legislation and regulations, persuasive techniques such as publicly funded subsidy programs or education, and participation in voluntary stewardship programs. This paper explores the benefits of collaborative governance programs, which have international applications to reduce the impact of the dairy industry on biodiversity loss. However, as the Australian sector is unique, the specific opportunities and present challenges are discussed. This paper reports three important objectives that could underpin industry-led initiatives by supporting improved biodiversity conservation on dairy farms: (1) Increase the personal and financial capacities of individual farmers to operate profitable, biodiverse farms; (2) Facilitate market rewards to incentivise pro-conservation behaviours; and (3) Improve the effectiveness of the implementation of biodiversity protection laws and regulatory objectives via collaborative governance arrangements. Existing environmental programs that have been developed by the dairy industry could be suitable for incorporation into more formal co-governance structures sympathetic to biodiversity conservation. However, to be successful in addressing sustainability issues, including biodiversity loss, strengthening the integrity mechanisms around farmers’ self-reporting of performance is required to ensure that the industry can credibly refute claims of greenwashing and defend their environmental credentials in the global marketplace.

Abstract Water scarcity is the most significant challenge facing semi-arid and arid areas because fresh water is often transferred from other areas to these regions, and then discharged as wastewater. Irrigating agricultural lands and green spaces with treated wastewater (TWW) can be thus regarded as a way to reduce pressure on fresh water resources and lead to the utilization of ecosystem services, such as regulating and cultural ones. The most important factor affecting the expansion and sustainability of these areas is people's participation. Therefore, this study reflected on the weight of locals' willingness and attitudes as one of the most effective factors in the development of irrigation with TWW in peri-urban areas and ecological buffer zones. The main indicators were accordingly extracted from previous research and examined through a survey questionnaire, and then analyzed by structural equation modeling (SEM) in the AMOS and LISREL software packages. The indicators were related to individuals' health in product consumption (health), people's activities in farmlands and green spaces (assurance), and users' distance from farmlands (accessibility). The study results revealed that accessibility was the most important factor, and then health and assurance were effective in people's participation in agricultural activities in farmlands irrigated with TWW in peri-urban areas and increasing green-space buffer zones.

Assurer des systèmes alimentaires résilients et des régimes alimentaires sains et durables pour tous nécessite une utilisation beaucoup plus élevée de l'eau. Cependant, les ressources en eau sont limitées, géographiquement dispersées, volatiles en raison du changement climatique et nécessaires à d'autres fonctions vitales, y compris les écosystèmes et les services qu'elles fournissent. Une bonne gouvernance pour des ressources en eau résilientes est un précurseur nécessaire pour décider des solutions, trouver des financements et fournir des infrastructures. Six attributs qui, ensemble, fournissent une base pour une bonne gouvernance afin de réduire les risques futurs liés à l'eau pour les systèmes alimentaires sont proposés. Ces attributs s'harmonisent dans leur double objectif d'intégrer l'apprentissage adaptatif et les nouvelles connaissances, et d'adopter les types de systèmes de gouvernance requis pour les systèmes alimentaires résilients à l'eau. Les attributs sont également fondés sur la nécessité de mieux reconnaître le rôle que jouent les écosystèmes naturels et sains dans les systèmes alimentaires. Les attributs sont énumérés ci-dessous et sont fondés sur des preuves scientifiques et la diversité de l'expérience collective et de l'expertise des parties prenantes travaillant à travers l'interface science-politique : adopter une pensée systémique interconnectée qui englobe la complexité de la façon dont nous produisons, distribuons et ajoutons de la valeur à la nourriture, y compris l'exploitation de l'expérience et de l'expertise des parties prenantes ; adopter une gouvernance inclusive à plusieurs niveaux et soutenir la participation inclusive ; permettre l'innovation continue, les nouvelles connaissances et l'apprentissage, et la diffusion de l'information ; intégrer la diversité et la redondance pour la résilience aux chocs ; assurer la préparation du système aux chocs ; et planifier à long terme. Cela nécessitera que les systèmes alimentaires et d'approvisionnement en eau travaillent ensemble de manière proactive pour créer un espace socialement et environnementalement juste qui tienne compte des besoins en eau et en nourriture des personnes, des écosystèmes qui sous-tendent nos systèmes alimentaires et des préoccupations plus larges en matière d'énergie et d'équité. Garantizar sistemas alimentarios resilientes y dietas saludables sostenibles para todos requiere un uso mucho mayor del agua, sin embargo, los recursos hídricos son finitos, geográficamente dispersos, volátiles bajo el cambio climático y necesarios para otras funciones vitales, incluidos los ecosistemas y los servicios que proporcionan. La buena gobernanza de los recursos hídricos resilientes es un precursor necesario para decidir sobre soluciones, obtener financiación y ofrecer infraestructura. Se proponen seis atributos que en conjunto proporcionan una base para la buena gobernanza a fin de reducir los riesgos futuros del agua para los sistemas alimentarios. Estos atributos encajan en su doble enfoque en la incorporación del aprendizaje adaptativo y los nuevos conocimientos, y la adopción de los tipos de sistemas de gobernanza necesarios para los sistemas alimentarios resilientes al agua. Los atributos también se basan en la necesidad de reconocer mejor el papel que desempeñan los ecosistemas naturales y saludables en los sistemas alimentarios. Los atributos se enumeran a continuación y se basan en la evidencia científica y la diversa experiencia colectiva y los conocimientos de las partes interesadas que trabajan a través de la interfaz ciencia-política: Adoptar un pensamiento de sistemas interconectados que abarque la complejidad de cómo producimos, distribuimos y agregamos valor a los alimentos, incluido el aprovechamiento de la experiencia y los conocimientos de las partes interesadas; adoptar una gobernanza inclusiva multinivel y apoyar la participación inclusiva; permitir la innovación continua, los nuevos conocimientos y el aprendizaje, y la difusión de información; incorporar diversidad y redundancia para la resiliencia a las crisis; garantizar la preparación del sistema para las crisis; y planificar a largo plazo. Esto requerirá que los sistemas de alimentos y agua trabajen juntos de manera proactiva hacia un espacio social y ambientalmente justo que considere las necesidades de agua y alimentos de las personas, los ecosistemas que sustentan nuestros sistemas alimentarios y las preocupaciones más amplias de energía y equidad. Ensuring resilient food systems and sustainable healthy diets for all requires much higher water use, however, water resources are finite, geographically dispersed, volatile under climate change, and required for other vital functions including ecosystems and the services they provide. Good governance for resilient water resources is a necessary precursor to deciding on solutions, sourcing finance, and delivering infrastructure. Six attributes that together provide a foundation for good governance to reduce future water risks to food systems are proposed. These attributes dovetail in their dual focus on incorporating adaptive learning and new knowledge, and adopting the types of governance systems required for water resilient food systems. The attributes are also founded in the need to greater recognise the role natural, healthy ecosystems play in food systems. The attributes are listed below and are grounded in scientific evidence and the diverse collective experience and expertise of stakeholders working across the science-policy interface: Adopting interconnected systems thinking that embraces the complexity of how we produce, distribute, and add value to food including harnessing the experience and expertise of stakeholders s; adopting multi-level inclusive governance and supporting inclusive participation; enabling continual innovation, new knowledge and learning, and information dissemination; incorporating diversity and redundancy for resilience to shocks; ensuring system preparedness to shocks; and planning for the long term. This will require food and water systems to pro-actively work together toward a socially and environmentally just space that considers the water and food needs of people, the ecosystems that underpin our food systems, and broader energy and equity concerns. يتطلب ضمان أنظمة غذائية مرنة وأنظمة غذائية صحية مستدامة للجميع استخدامًا للمياه أعلى بكثير، ومع ذلك، فإن موارد المياه محدودة ومتناثرة جغرافيًا ومتقلبة في ظل تغير المناخ، ومطلوبة للوظائف الحيوية الأخرى بما في ذلك النظم الإيكولوجية والخدمات التي تقدمها. تعد الحوكمة الرشيدة لموارد المياه المرنة مقدمة ضرورية لاتخاذ قرار بشأن الحلول، وتوفير التمويل، وتوفير البنية التحتية. تم اقتراح ست سمات توفر معًا أساسًا للحوكمة الرشيدة للحد من مخاطر المياه المستقبلية على النظم الغذائية. تتوافق هذه السمات في تركيزها المزدوج على دمج التعلم التكيفي والمعرفة الجديدة، واعتماد أنواع أنظمة الحوكمة المطلوبة للنظم الغذائية المرنة للمياه. وتستند السمات أيضًا إلى الحاجة إلى زيادة الاعتراف بالدور الذي تلعبه النظم الإيكولوجية الطبيعية والصحية في النظم الغذائية. السمات مدرجة أدناه وترتكز على الأدلة العلمية والخبرة والتجربة الجماعية المتنوعة لأصحاب المصلحة العاملين عبر واجهة العلوم والسياسات: اعتماد تفكير النظم المترابطة التي تتبنى تعقيد كيفية إنتاج وتوزيع وإضافة قيمة إلى الغذاء بما في ذلك تسخير تجربة وخبرات أصحاب المصلحة ؛ اعتماد حوكمة شاملة متعددة المستويات ودعم المشاركة الشاملة ؛ تمكين الابتكار المستمر والمعرفة الجديدة والتعلم ونشر المعلومات ؛ دمج التنوع والتكرار من أجل المرونة في مواجهة الصدمات ؛ ضمان استعداد النظام للصدمات ؛ والتخطيط على المدى الطويل. سيتطلب ذلك أن تعمل أنظمة الغذاء والمياه معًا بشكل استباقي نحو مساحة عادلة اجتماعيًا وبيئيًا تأخذ في الاعتبار الاحتياجات المائية والغذائية للناس، والنظم الإيكولوجية التي تدعم أنظمتنا الغذائية، ومخاوف أوسع بشأن الطاقة والإنصاف.

Abstract The water environment in Chinese rural areas has seriously deteriorated to the extent that the development of rural areas is now under threat. To deal with this issue, the Chinese government has been promoting wastewater treatment systems (WTS) in rural areas since 2005. However, some of these wastewater treatment plants have shut down after just a few years. Thus, even though the number of newly built plants in rural areas has been rapidly increasing, the failure of these plants can impede the development of an efficient wastewater treatment in Chinese rural areas. This paper investigates the challenges faced by the management of the constructed wastewater treatment plants in Chinese rural areas using the case study method. Two cases, of Zhejiang and Hainan provinces, were analysed separately; the operation was successful in the former province and a failure in the latter one. The study demonstrates that the WTS in rural areas are faced with diverse implementation challenges, ranging from unsustainable financial sources for operation and maintenance cost to inappropriate governance structure, potential risks due to the local leadership rotation system of the government, limited participation by farmers in the management and technical complexity.

Increased energy efficiency and/or optimised energy management and/or integrate a higher share of renewables. Thus, the term energy communities in SHAREs refers to all forms of collective actions by and for consumers such as cooperatives, collective purchase groups or other consumer-driven collective actions. Six countries are involved in the project implementation: Austria, Germany, Croatia, Bulgaria, Georgia and Hungary. In order to achieve a clean energy transition, all consumer groups need to be involved and convinced to contribute to the energy market. Founders of energy communities are by definition very motivated and “on-board” but often lack the tools to engage with other consumer groups. The concept of the SHAREs project is simple and straightforward - to create a Gateway for those interested in setting up collective actions to help them initiate an action and grow. The Gateway will consist of: (1) A country-specific implementation toolkit to equip local heroes with the technical and logistic capacity to set up their energy community (legal framework, such as master contracts, technical and IT solutions, business models, etc.); (2) The building blocks of a tailored “pick-and-mix” communication campaign to enable local heroes to promote their idea effectively to their most relevant stakeholder groups. The Gateway will combine the insights and tools from existing initiatives as well as input of established energy communities (pioneers) and policy developers. After having been put to test and refined in at least 20 aspiring energy communities in 6 European countries, the Gateway will be broadly disseminated to relevant stakeholders all over Europe. Proceedings of the 30th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 9-12 May 2022, Online, pp. 314-316

In the Colombian context, disputes over natural resources, mainly over land, and poor governance are intertwined with armed conflict. Although efforts to address this situation, including the 2016 peace agreement signed between Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC, by Spanish acronym) are underway, these disputes continue, affecting land use dynamics. Understanding the complexity and trends in land use conflicts, as well as the specific regional characteristics underlying differing land use changes across regions, is critical. This article aims to systematically understand land use dynamics in two contrasting and conflict-affected territories in Colombia, Caquetá and Cesar, thus identifying entry points to address land-use conflicts at the regional level. To address the complexity of each regional case, we apply a methodology based on system thinking to capture the interconnections between socio-economic and environmental system components and their land use dynamics. Results depicted through causal loop diagrams not just show the cascade of environmental, social, and economic failures resulting from land use changes in these two conflict-affected territories but also suggest that land tenure systems innovations and the promotion of sustainable land use interventions at the regional level can reverse the consequences of the land use changes. Thus, future actions addressing land use conflicts must be context-dependent, tackling the root and structural causes.

The promotion and implementation of carbon neutrality against peaking carbon dioxide emissions urgently need the support of science and technology and the backing provided by a guarantee of rule of law. The proposition, logic, and progression of digital responses to peaking carbon dioxide levels in the search for carbon neutrality are clearly reflected in the current era, employing big data to address the problems of inadequate central–local coordination and interaction, the inadequate application of the rule of law, campaign-style “carbon reduction” promotion, and scientific and technological support in the promotion and implementation of peak carbon dioxide emissions and carbon neutrality. We need to pay attention to the coordination of digital technology, the rule of law response, and the protection of people’s rights. First, in the process of digital carbon dioxide peaking and carbon neutrality, it is necessary to improve the credibility of carbon dioxide peaking and carbon neutrality through the “whole-process trace” and storage mechanism techniques that are made possible by blockchain technology. Second, it is necessary to refine the management of peak carbon dioxide emissions and carbon neutrality through “decentralization” and consensus mechanisms. Third, it is necessary to improve the effectiveness of governance in the management of peak carbon dioxide emissions and carbon neutrality through “non-falsifiability” and collaboration mechanisms. Fourth and finally, the conclusions of this paper are offered. First, from the aspect of smart city construction, it is necessary to promote the coordinated construction of a low-carbon city and smart city and explore the legal ramifications of low-carbon development in urban governance. Second, in corporate governance, we need to build a low-carbon-development digital platform to promote the integration of digital technology and corporate compliance. Third, in terms of global governance, we need to promote the rule of law in cyberspace to address global climate change, the low-carbon development of digital technology, and the low-carbon construction of a cyber society. Fourth, we need to emphasize the rights and obligations of different parties in the implementation mechanism of the rule of law on digital carbon peaks and carbon neutrality.