• Energy Research
• 13. Climate action close
• CA close
• FR close

Abstract This paper describes the point of view of a gas utility regarding systems for cooling and heating by solid sorption. Indeed, the context is favorable to the emergence of such systems first, of course, due to the regulatory constraints on certain refrigerant fluids, but also for their specific technical characteristics (the storage capacity, for example). The gas utilities have in fact shown an increasingly keen interest in all types of sorption systems, as a way of diversifying natural gas utilization, particularly in the summer. After a review of that context, this paper highlights the advantages of solid sorption and describes the criteria for choosing an installation in air conditioning and cooling production applications. Finally, it discusses the difficulties likely to be encountered in developing sorption systems, as well as the prospects for the future.

Abstract This paper describes the point of view of a gas utility regarding systems for cooling and heating by solid sorption. Indeed, the context is favorable to the emergence of such systems first, of course, due to the regulatory constraints on certain refrigerant fluids, but also for their specific technical characteristics (the storage capacity, for example). The gas utilities have in fact shown an increasingly keen interest in all types of sorption systems, as a way of diversifying natural gas utilization, particularly in the summer. After a review of that context, this paper highlights the advantages of solid sorption and describes the criteria for choosing an installation in air conditioning and cooling production applications. Finally, it discusses the difficulties likely to be encountered in developing sorption systems, as well as the prospects for the future.

Current food systems are challenged by relying on a few input-intensive, staple crops. The prioritization of yield and the loss of diversity during the recent history of domestication has created contemporary crops and cropping systems that are ecologically unsustainable, vulnerable to climate change, nutrient poor, and socially inequitable. For decades, scientists have proposed diversity as a solution to address these challenges to global food security. Here, we outline the possibilities for a new era of crop domestication, focused on broadening the palette of crop diversity, that engages and benefits the three elements of domestication: crops, ecosystems, and humans. We explore how the suite of tools and technologies at hand can be applied to renew diversity in existing crops, improve underutilized crops, and domesticate new crops to bolster genetic, agroecosystem, and food system diversity. Implementing the new era of domestication requires that researchers, funders, and policymakers boldly invest in basic and translational research. Humans need more diverse food systems in the Anthropocene—the process of domestication can help build them.

Current food systems are challenged by relying on a few input-intensive, staple crops. The prioritization of yield and the loss of diversity during the recent history of domestication has created contemporary crops and cropping systems that are ecologically unsustainable, vulnerable to climate change, nutrient poor, and socially inequitable. For decades, scientists have proposed diversity as a solution to address these challenges to global food security. Here, we outline the possibilities for a new era of crop domestication, focused on broadening the palette of crop diversity, that engages and benefits the three elements of domestication: crops, ecosystems, and humans. We explore how the suite of tools and technologies at hand can be applied to renew diversity in existing crops, improve underutilized crops, and domesticate new crops to bolster genetic, agroecosystem, and food system diversity. Implementing the new era of domestication requires that researchers, funders, and policymakers boldly invest in basic and translational research. Humans need more diverse food systems in the Anthropocene—the process of domestication can help build them.

Abstract In this paper, an exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a combined solar and wind energy based system is proposed. The trigeneration system produces ammonia, hydrogen and electricity through integrated solar photovoltaic panels and wind turbines. Also, an ammonia fuel cell unit is utilized for generating power during insufficient available energy. The overall exergetic efficiency is found to be 29.7% and the corresponding energetic efficiency is 28.5% under design conditions. In addition, the total cost rate is obtained as 63,345 $/h. Moreover, multi-objective optimization is performed with various decision variables at different combinations of solar intensities and wind speeds, considering the maximization of exergy efficiency and minimization of total cost rates. The developed system provides better optimal operation points under high wind speeds. The optimal exergy efficiency is found to vary between 10.9% and 38.2% depending on the available solar and wind energy. The corresponding optimal total cost rates vary between 11,959 $/h and 59,755 $/h, respectively. Several parametric studies are also performed to determine the effects of changing system conditions on the thermodynamic and economic performance of the developed system.

Abstract In this paper, an exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a combined solar and wind energy based system is proposed. The trigeneration system produces ammonia, hydrogen and electricity through integrated solar photovoltaic panels and wind turbines. Also, an ammonia fuel cell unit is utilized for generating power during insufficient available energy. The overall exergetic efficiency is found to be 29.7% and the corresponding energetic efficiency is 28.5% under design conditions. In addition, the total cost rate is obtained as 63,345 $/h. Moreover, multi-objective optimization is performed with various decision variables at different combinations of solar intensities and wind speeds, considering the maximization of exergy efficiency and minimization of total cost rates. The developed system provides better optimal operation points under high wind speeds. The optimal exergy efficiency is found to vary between 10.9% and 38.2% depending on the available solar and wind energy. The corresponding optimal total cost rates vary between 11,959 $/h and 59,755 $/h, respectively. Several parametric studies are also performed to determine the effects of changing system conditions on the thermodynamic and economic performance of the developed system.

Research on the human dimensions of climate change (HDCC) in the Canadian Arctic has expanded so rapidly over the past decade that we do not have a clear grasp of the current state of knowledge or research gaps. This lack of clarity has implications for duplication of climate policy and research, and it has been identified as a problem by communities, scientists, policy makers, and northern organizations. Our review of current knowledge about the HDCC in Nunavut, Nunavik, and Nunatsiavut indicates that the effects of climate change on subsistence harvesting and other land-based activities and the determinants of vulnerability and adaptation to such changes are well understood. However, the effects of climate change on health are less known. In the nascent research on this topic, studies on food security and personal safety dominate, and little peer-reviewed scholarship focuses on the business and economic sector. Published research shows a strong bias toward case studies in smaller communities, especially communities in Nunavut. Such studies have focused primarily on negative impacts of climate change, present-day vulnerabilities, and adaptive capacity, but studies proposing opportunities for adaptation intervention are beginning to emerge. While documenting the serious risks posed by climate change, they also highlight the adaptability of northern populations and the effects of economic-political stresses on vulnerability to changing climate. We note the absence of studies that examine how Northerners can benefit from new opportunities that may arise from climate change, or assess how the interaction of future climatic and socio-economic changes (specifically, resource development and enhanced shipping) will affect their experience of and response to climate change, or discuss the broader determinants of vulnerability and adaptation.

Research on the human dimensions of climate change (HDCC) in the Canadian Arctic has expanded so rapidly over the past decade that we do not have a clear grasp of the current state of knowledge or research gaps. This lack of clarity has implications for duplication of climate policy and research, and it has been identified as a problem by communities, scientists, policy makers, and northern organizations. Our review of current knowledge about the HDCC in Nunavut, Nunavik, and Nunatsiavut indicates that the effects of climate change on subsistence harvesting and other land-based activities and the determinants of vulnerability and adaptation to such changes are well understood. However, the effects of climate change on health are less known. In the nascent research on this topic, studies on food security and personal safety dominate, and little peer-reviewed scholarship focuses on the business and economic sector. Published research shows a strong bias toward case studies in smaller communities, especially communities in Nunavut. Such studies have focused primarily on negative impacts of climate change, present-day vulnerabilities, and adaptive capacity, but studies proposing opportunities for adaptation intervention are beginning to emerge. While documenting the serious risks posed by climate change, they also highlight the adaptability of northern populations and the effects of economic-political stresses on vulnerability to changing climate. We note the absence of studies that examine how Northerners can benefit from new opportunities that may arise from climate change, or assess how the interaction of future climatic and socio-economic changes (specifically, resource development and enhanced shipping) will affect their experience of and response to climate change, or discuss the broader determinants of vulnerability and adaptation.

Climate change is already affecting the cardiorespiratory health of populations around the world, and these impacts are expected to increase. The present overview serves as a primer for respirologists who are concerned about how these profound environmental changes may affect their patients. The authors consider recent peer‐reviewed literature with a focus on climate interactions with air pollution. They do not discuss in detail cardiorespiratory health effects for which the potential link to climate change is poorly understood. For example, pneumonia and influenza, which affect >500 million people per year, are not addressed, although clear seasonal variation suggests climate‐related effects. Additionally, large global health impacts in low‐resource countries, including migration precipitated by environmental change, are omitted. The major cardiorespiratory health impacts addressed are due to heat, air pollution and wildfires, shifts in allergens and infectious diseases along with respiratory impacts from flooding. Personal and societal choices about carbon use and fossil energy infrastructure should be informed by their impacts on health, and respirologists can play an important role in this discussion.