• Energy Research
• other engineering and technologies close
• 13. Climate action close
• AU close
• FI close

Microalgae have tremendous potential for producing liquid renewable fuel. Many methods for converting microalgae to biofuel have been proposed; however, an economical and energetically feasible route for algal fuel production is yet to be found. This paper presents a review on the comparison of the most promising conversion pathways of microalgae to liquid fuel: hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), wet extraction and non-destructive extraction. The comparison is based on important assessment parameters of product quality and yield, nutrient recovery, GHG emissions, energy and the cost associated with the production of fuel from microalgae, in order to better understand the pros and cons of each method. It was found that the HTL pathway produces more oil than the wet extraction pathway; however, higher concentrations of unwanted components are present in the HTL oil produced. Less nutrients (N and P) can be recovered in HTL compared to wet extraction. HTL consumes more fossil energy and generates higher GHG emissions than wet extraction, while the production cost of fuel from HTL pathway is lower than wet extraction pathway. There is considerable uncertainty in the comparison of the energy consumption and economics of the HTL pathway and the wet extraction pathway due to different scenarios analysed in the assessment studies. To be able to appropriately compare methodologies, the conversion methods should be analysed from growth to upgradation of oil utilising sufficiently similar assumptions and scenarios. Based on the data in available literature, wet oil extraction is the more appropriate system for biofuel production than HTL. However, the potential of alternative extraction/conversion technologies, such as, non-destructive extraction, need to be further assessed.

Microalgae have tremendous potential for producing liquid renewable fuel. Many methods for converting microalgae to biofuel have been proposed; however, an economical and energetically feasible route for algal fuel production is yet to be found. This paper presents a review on the comparison of the most promising conversion pathways of microalgae to liquid fuel: hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), wet extraction and non-destructive extraction. The comparison is based on important assessment parameters of product quality and yield, nutrient recovery, GHG emissions, energy and the cost associated with the production of fuel from microalgae, in order to better understand the pros and cons of each method. It was found that the HTL pathway produces more oil than the wet extraction pathway; however, higher concentrations of unwanted components are present in the HTL oil produced. Less nutrients (N and P) can be recovered in HTL compared to wet extraction. HTL consumes more fossil energy and generates higher GHG emissions than wet extraction, while the production cost of fuel from HTL pathway is lower than wet extraction pathway. There is considerable uncertainty in the comparison of the energy consumption and economics of the HTL pathway and the wet extraction pathway due to different scenarios analysed in the assessment studies. To be able to appropriately compare methodologies, the conversion methods should be analysed from growth to upgradation of oil utilising sufficiently similar assumptions and scenarios. Based on the data in available literature, wet oil extraction is the more appropriate system for biofuel production than HTL. However, the potential of alternative extraction/conversion technologies, such as, non-destructive extraction, need to be further assessed.

Abstract Intermittent renewable energy generation, which is determined by weather conditions, is increasing in power markets. The efficient integration of these energy sources calls for flexible participants in smart power grids. It has been acknowledged that a large, underutilized, flexible resource lies on the consumer side of electricity generation. Despite the recently increasing interest in demand flexibility, there is a gap in the literature concerning the incentives for consumers to offer their flexible energy to power markets. In this paper, we examine a virtual power plant concept, which simultaneously optimizes the response of controllable electric hot water heaters to solar power forecast error imbalances. Uncertainty is included in the optimization in terms of solar power day-ahead forecast errors and balancing power market conditions. We show that including solar power imbalance minimization in the target function changes the optimal hot water heating profile such that more electricity is used during the daytime. The virtual power plant operation decreases solar power imbalances by 5–10% and benefits the participating households by 4.0–7.5 € in extra savings annually. The results of this study indicate that with the number of participating households, while total profits increase, marginal revenues decrease.

Abstract Intermittent renewable energy generation, which is determined by weather conditions, is increasing in power markets. The efficient integration of these energy sources calls for flexible participants in smart power grids. It has been acknowledged that a large, underutilized, flexible resource lies on the consumer side of electricity generation. Despite the recently increasing interest in demand flexibility, there is a gap in the literature concerning the incentives for consumers to offer their flexible energy to power markets. In this paper, we examine a virtual power plant concept, which simultaneously optimizes the response of controllable electric hot water heaters to solar power forecast error imbalances. Uncertainty is included in the optimization in terms of solar power day-ahead forecast errors and balancing power market conditions. We show that including solar power imbalance minimization in the target function changes the optimal hot water heating profile such that more electricity is used during the daytime. The virtual power plant operation decreases solar power imbalances by 5–10% and benefits the participating households by 4.0–7.5 € in extra savings annually. The results of this study indicate that with the number of participating households, while total profits increase, marginal revenues decrease.

Abstract This study evaluates the performance of 75 clear-sky global irradiance models against 75 ground stations worldwide covering five major Koppen-Geiger climate classifications and overall global performance. After quality control, clear-sky detection and data-availability criteria, there are 4.36 million 1-min valid global horizontal irradiance (GHI) data points for evaluation. This study represents the most encompassing evaluation of its kind in terms of number of models assessed, number of ground stations used, most consistent selection of input variables in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, also using the most rigorous and fair performance assessment criteria and suitable ranking system. A statistically rigorous Principal Component Analysis (PCA) ranking procedure is proposed to replace the conventional ordering method based on single and simple statistics. In particular, it is demonstrated that all 13 error metrics contribute to the variance of GHI estimation and thus must all be accounted for in the ranking procedure. The best performing models in each climate zone of equatorial, arid, temperate, cold and polar are REST2v9.1, REST2v9.1, MAC2, REST2v5 and CLS, respectively. Globally, the top three performing models are MAC2, REST2v5, and REST2v9.1. Many models appear to suffer from over-fitting empirical relationships to training data, resulting in inconsistent worldwide performance. Furthermore, six different formulations of the Linke Turbidity factor (TL) are evaluated through its application to five clear-sky models that require it as an input. The best globally performing TL formulations are either by Ineichen or Gueymard when combined with four of the five Linke-dependent clear-sky models, whilst the Grenier formulation performs best with the Ineichen & Perez model. Significant performance variation is observed depending on the TL formulation selected, hence, careful selection is required for an optimal application. The model codes are available in R [1].

Abstract This study evaluates the performance of 75 clear-sky global irradiance models against 75 ground stations worldwide covering five major Koppen-Geiger climate classifications and overall global performance. After quality control, clear-sky detection and data-availability criteria, there are 4.36 million 1-min valid global horizontal irradiance (GHI) data points for evaluation. This study represents the most encompassing evaluation of its kind in terms of number of models assessed, number of ground stations used, most consistent selection of input variables in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, also using the most rigorous and fair performance assessment criteria and suitable ranking system. A statistically rigorous Principal Component Analysis (PCA) ranking procedure is proposed to replace the conventional ordering method based on single and simple statistics. In particular, it is demonstrated that all 13 error metrics contribute to the variance of GHI estimation and thus must all be accounted for in the ranking procedure. The best performing models in each climate zone of equatorial, arid, temperate, cold and polar are REST2v9.1, REST2v9.1, MAC2, REST2v5 and CLS, respectively. Globally, the top three performing models are MAC2, REST2v5, and REST2v9.1. Many models appear to suffer from over-fitting empirical relationships to training data, resulting in inconsistent worldwide performance. Furthermore, six different formulations of the Linke Turbidity factor (TL) are evaluated through its application to five clear-sky models that require it as an input. The best globally performing TL formulations are either by Ineichen or Gueymard when combined with four of the five Linke-dependent clear-sky models, whilst the Grenier formulation performs best with the Ineichen & Perez model. Significant performance variation is observed depending on the TL formulation selected, hence, careful selection is required for an optimal application. The model codes are available in R [1].

Abstract Algae have been considered as a promising biodiesel feedstock. One of the major factors affecting large-scale algae technology application is poor wintering cultivation performance. In this study, an integrated approach is investigated combining freshwater microalgae Chlorella zofingiensis wintering cultivation in pilot-scale photobioreactors with artificial wastewater treatment. Mixotrophic culture with the addition of acetic acid (pH-regulation group) and autotrophic culture (control group) were designed, and the characteristics of algal growth, lipid and biodiesel production, and nitrogen and phosphate removal were examined. The results showed that, by using acetic acid three times per day to regulate pH at between 6.8 and 7.2, the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphate (TP) removal could be increased from 45.2% to 73.5% and from 92.2% to 100%, respectively. Higher biomass productivity of 66.94 mg L−1 day−1 with specific growth rate of 0.260 day−1 was achieved in the pH-regulation group. The lipid content was much higher when using acetic acid to regulate pH, and the relative lipid productivity reached 37.48 mg L−1 day−1. The biodiesel yield in the pH-regulated group was 19.44% of dry weight, with 16–18 carbons as the most abundant composition for fatty acid methyl esters. The findings of the study prove that pH adjustment using acetic acid is efficient in cultivating C. zofingiensis in wastewater in winter for biodiesel production and nutrient reduction.

Abstract Algae have been considered as a promising biodiesel feedstock. One of the major factors affecting large-scale algae technology application is poor wintering cultivation performance. In this study, an integrated approach is investigated combining freshwater microalgae Chlorella zofingiensis wintering cultivation in pilot-scale photobioreactors with artificial wastewater treatment. Mixotrophic culture with the addition of acetic acid (pH-regulation group) and autotrophic culture (control group) were designed, and the characteristics of algal growth, lipid and biodiesel production, and nitrogen and phosphate removal were examined. The results showed that, by using acetic acid three times per day to regulate pH at between 6.8 and 7.2, the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphate (TP) removal could be increased from 45.2% to 73.5% and from 92.2% to 100%, respectively. Higher biomass productivity of 66.94 mg L−1 day−1 with specific growth rate of 0.260 day−1 was achieved in the pH-regulation group. The lipid content was much higher when using acetic acid to regulate pH, and the relative lipid productivity reached 37.48 mg L−1 day−1. The biodiesel yield in the pH-regulated group was 19.44% of dry weight, with 16–18 carbons as the most abundant composition for fatty acid methyl esters. The findings of the study prove that pH adjustment using acetic acid is efficient in cultivating C. zofingiensis in wastewater in winter for biodiesel production and nutrient reduction.