• Energy Research
• 12. Responsible consumption close
• FR close
• DE close
• IT close
• CGIAR close

La combinaison de différents systèmes de culture et de travail du sol avec différents génotypes au cours de plusieurs saisons de culture peut révéler des opportunités d'intensification durable (IS). L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer la performance de six génotypes de maïs en culture intercalaire avec labour de conservation (sans labour) - deux options prometteuses pour le SI. L'expérience a été menée sur trois ans (ou six saisons de culture) à la station de recherche de Kiboko, au Kenya, avec la culture de la sole et le labour des plaques de moulage comme systèmes de production de base. Les résultats ont montré que les génotypes et les systèmes de culture du maïs avaient un effet significatif sur le rendement, mais que l'effet du travail du sol n'était pas significatif. De plus, il n'y avait pas d'effets interactifs significatifs des facteurs testés sur le rendement du maïs. Le génotype de maïs CKH10085 avait le rendement le plus élevé de 7,7 t ha-1 en culture en solitaire, mais il a également enregistré la plus grande pénalité de rendement en raison de la culture intercalaire de 1,1 t ha-1. D'autre part, le génotype CKH10717 a maintenu le même rendement moyen de 7,1 t ha-1 dans les systèmes de travail du sol conventionnels et de conservation. Les génotypes commerciaux CKH10080 et CKH08051 étaient plus stables que les autres génotypes expérimentaux dans les conditions variables de croissance et de gestion. Ces deux génotypes sont de maturité intermédiaire et de tolérance à la sécheresse, deux attributs essentiels à l'amélioration de la production de maïs. Les cultures intercalaires ont réduit les rendements de maïs en raison de la concurrence accrue, par exemple, le rendement global de la culture de la sole était de 7,1 t ha-1 par rapport à 6,4 t ha-1 en cultures intercalaires ; ce qui représente une pénalité de rendement global de 0,7 t ha-1. Les différences de performance des génotypes de maïs ont révélé des possibilités de déploiement de génotypes pour réduire les risques ou maximiser le rendement, en fonction des circonstances biophysiques et de l'objectif de production de l'agriculteur. La combinación de diferentes sistemas de cultivo y labranza con diferentes genotipos a lo largo de varias temporadas de cultivo puede revelar oportunidades para la intensificación sostenible (IS). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el rendimiento de seis genotipos de maíz en cultivos intercalados con labranza conservadora (sin labranza), dos opciones prometedoras para SI. El experimento se llevó a cabo durante tres años (o seis temporadas de cultivo) en la Estación de Investigación de Kiboko, Kenia, con el cultivo de lenguado y el arado de vertederos como sistemas de producción de referencia. Los resultados mostraron que los genotipos de maíz y los sistemas de cultivo tuvieron un efecto significativo en el rendimiento, pero el efecto de la labranza no fue significativo. Además, no hubo efectos interactivos significativos de los factores probados en el rendimiento del maíz. El genotipo de maíz CKH10085 tuvo el mayor rendimiento de 7,7 t ha-1 en el cultivo de lenguado, pero también registró la mayor penalización de rendimiento debido al cultivo intercalado de 1,1 t ha-1. Por otro lado, el genotipo CKH10717 mantuvo el mismo rendimiento medio de 7,1 t ha-1 tanto en sistemas de labranza convencional como conservadora. Los genotipos comerciales CKH10080 y CKH08051 fueron más estables que los otros genotipos experimentales en las condiciones variables de crecimiento y manejo. Estos dos genotipos son de madurez intermedia y tolerancia a la sequía, dos atributos críticos para mejorar la producción de maíz. Los cultivos intercalados redujeron los rendimientos de maíz debido a una mayor competencia, por ejemplo, el rendimiento general del cultivo de lenguado fue de 7,1 t ha-1 en comparación con 6,4 t ha-1 en cultivos intercalados; lo que representa una penalización de rendimiento general de 0,7 t ha-1. Las diferencias en el rendimiento de los genotipos de maíz revelaron oportunidades para desplegar genotipos para reducir el riesgo o maximizar el rendimiento, dependiendo de las circunstancias biofísicas y el objetivo de producción del agricultor. Combining different cropping and tillage systems with different genotypes across several cropping seasons can reveal opportunities for sustainable intensification (SI). The objective of this study was to assess the performance of six maize genotypes under intercropping with conservation tillage (no-till) - two promising options for SI. The experiment was carried out over three years (or six cropping seasons) at Kiboko Research Station, Kenya with sole cropping and mouldboard ploughing as baseline production systems. Results showed that maize genotypes and cropping systems had a significant effect on yield, but the effect of tillage was not significant. Moreover, there was no significant interactive effects of the tested factors on maize yield. The maize genotype CKH10085 had the highest yield of 7.7 t ha-1 under sole cropping yet it also recorded the largest yield penalty due to intercropping of 1.1 t ha-1. On the other hand, genotype CKH10717 maintained the same average yield of 7.1 t ha-1 in both conventional and conservation tillage systems. The commercial genotype genotype CKH10080 and CKH08051 were more stable than the other experimental genotypes under the variable growing and management conditions. These two genotypes are of intermediate maturity and drought tolerance, two critical attributes to improved maize production. Intercropping reduced maize yields due to increased competition, for example the overall yield of sole cropping was 7.1 t ha-1 compared with 6.4 t ha-1 under intercropping; representing an overall yield penalty of 0.7 t ha-1. The differences in performance of maize genotypes revealed opportunities to deploy genotypes to reduce risk or maximize yield, depending on the biophysical circumstances and the production objective of the farmer. يمكن أن يكشف الجمع بين أنظمة المحاصيل والحراثة المختلفة والأنماط الجينية المختلفة عبر العديد من مواسم المحاصيل عن فرص للتكثيف المستدام (SI). كان الهدف من هذه الدراسة هو تقييم أداء ستة أنماط جينية للذرة تحت الزراعة البينية مع حراثة الحفظ (بدون حراثة) - وهما خياران واعدان لـ SI. تم إجراء التجربة على مدى ثلاث سنوات (أو ستة مواسم زراعة) في محطة أبحاث كيبوكو، كينيا باستخدام الزراعة الوحيدة وحرث ألواح القوالب كنظم إنتاج أساسية. أظهرت النتائج أن الأنماط الجينية للذرة وأنظمة المحاصيل كان لها تأثير كبير على المحصول، لكن تأثير الحراثة لم يكن كبيرًا. علاوة على ذلك، لم تكن هناك آثار تفاعلية كبيرة للعوامل التي تم اختبارها على محصول الذرة. كان للنمط الجيني للذرة CKH10085 أعلى إنتاجية تبلغ 7.7 طن هكتار -1 تحت المحصول الوحيد، ومع ذلك فقد سجل أيضًا أكبر عقوبة على المحصول بسبب المحصول البيني البالغ 1.1 طن هكتار -1. من ناحية أخرى، حافظ النمط الجيني CKH10717 على نفس متوسط العائد البالغ 7.1 طن هكتار -1 في كل من أنظمة الحراثة التقليدية وأنظمة الحفظ. كان النمط الجيني التجاري CKH10080 و CKH08051 أكثر استقرارًا من الأنماط الجينية التجريبية الأخرى في ظل ظروف النمو والإدارة المتغيرة. هذان النمطان الوراثيان لهما نضج متوسط وتحمل للجفاف، وهما سمتان حاسمتان لتحسين إنتاج الذرة. قللت الزراعة البينية من غلة الذرة بسبب زيادة المنافسة، على سبيل المثال، كان العائد الإجمالي للمحصول الوحيد 7.1 طن هكتار -1 مقارنة بـ 6.4 طن هكتار -1 تحت الزراعة البينية ؛ مما يمثل عقوبة إنتاجية إجمالية قدرها 0.7 طن هكتار -1. كشفت الاختلافات في أداء الأنماط الجينية للذرة عن فرص لنشر الأنماط الجينية لتقليل المخاطر أو زيادة الغلة، اعتمادًا على الظروف الفيزيائية الحيوية وهدف الإنتاج للمزارع.

Understanding the impacts of climate on food systems is vital to identifying the most effective food system interventions to support climate-smart agriculture. The study examines how climate change is affecting food systems and what can be done to mitigate its effects. Two methodological approaches were combined in the study. The first was an Asia-wide regional consultation and forum to explore a range of initiatives that transform food systems among stakeholders working in Myanmar. The second method was an in-depth food systems study employing qualitative methods in Htee Pu Village in the Myanmar Central Dry Zone, a research site of IIRR since 2017. Key informant interviews (KII) and focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted to capture insights and data. Food systems consist of components, drivers, actors, and elements that interact with one another and other systems such as social, health, and transportation. The Myanmar food system is complex. Making it sustainable and transformative requires a mix of different approaches implemented at various scales from local to national. It also requires actions that engage various actors in the system from producers to consumers. The study of the local food system of Htee Pu Village indicates that the village has a rural and traditional food system and that climate change is one of its key food system drivers. Climate change negatively impacted farming and agricultural practices and disrupted the input supply of the local food systems. The role of intermediaries such as traders and consolidators is critical in the supply and distribution of food in the Central Dry Zone. Improved and more connected roads are essential for the supply and distribution of food for the village. The informal market outlets serve as the primary food source or sale points for households. Household diets are inadequate in quantity as the population remains highly dependent on their crops for their diets due to relatively low income. Climate adaptation must be embedded in the local level management to mitigate the effect of climate change in food production in the longer term.

AbstractAchieving gender equality and women’s empowerment in food systems can result in greater food security and better nutrition, as well as more just, resilient and sustainable food systems for all. This chapter uses a scoping review to assess the current evidence on pathways between gender equality, women’s empowerment and food systems. The chapter uses an adaptation of the food system framework to organize the evidence and identify where evidence is strong, and where gaps remain. Results show strong evidence on women’s differing access to resources, shaped and reinforced by contextual social gender norms, and on links between women’s empowerment and maternal education and important outcomes, such as nutrition and dietary diversity. However, evidence is limited on issues such as gender considerations in food systems for women in urban areas and in aquaculture value chains, best practices and effective pathways for engaging men in the process of women’s empowerment in food systems, and how to address issues related to migration, crises and indigenous food systems. While there are gender-informed evaluation studies examining the effectiveness of gender- and nutrition-sensitive agricultural programs, evidence indicating the long-term sustainability of such impacts remains limited. The chapter recommends key areas for investment: improving women’s leadership and decision-making in food systems, promoting equal and positive gender norms, improving access to resources, and building cross-contextual research evidence on gender and food systems.

COVID-19 has changed the permeability of borders in transboundary environmental governance regimes. While borders have always been selectively permeable, the pandemic has reconfigured the nature of cross-border flows of people, natural resources, finances and technologies. This has altered the availability of spaces for enacting sustainability initiatives within and between countries. In Southeast Asia, national governments and businesses seeking to expedite economic recovery from the pandemic-induced recession have selectively re-opened borders by accelerating production and revitalizing agro-export growth. Widening regional inequities have also contributed to increased cross-border flows of illicit commodities, such as trafficked wildlife. At the same time, border restrictions under the exigencies of controlling the pandemic have led to a rolling back and scaling down of transboundary environmental agreements, regulations and programs, with important implications for environmental democracy, socio-ecological justice and sustainability. Drawing on evidence from Southeast Asia, the article assesses the policy challenges and opportunities posed by the shifting permeability of borders for organising and operationalising environmental activities at different scales of transboundary governance.

AbstractPlant-based animal product alternatives are increasingly promoted to achieve more sustainable diets. Here, we use a global economic land use model to assess the food system-wide impacts of a global dietary shift towards these alternatives. We find a substantial reduction in the global environmental impacts by 2050 if globally 50% of the main animal products (pork, chicken, beef and milk) are substituted—net reduction of forest and natural land is almost fully halted and agriculture and land use GHG emissions decline by 31% in 2050 compared to 2020. If spared agricultural land within forest ecosystems is restored to forest, climate benefits could double, reaching 92% of the previously estimated land sector mitigation potential. Furthermore, the restored area could contribute to 13-25% of the estimated global land restoration needs under target 2 from the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework by 2030, and future declines in ecosystem integrity by 2050 would be more than halved. The distribution of these impacts varies across regions—the main impacts on agricultural input use are in China and on environmental outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa and South America. While beef replacement provides the largest impacts, substituting multiple products is synergistic.

Forest resources share attributes with many other resource systems that make difficult their governance and management in a sustainable, efficient, and equitable manner. While some ‘forests’ are small enough that fencing them or protecting their borders from intrusion is relatively easy, excluding beneficiaries from access and use of most forests is costly. The difficulty of exclusion creates the possibility that individuals who benefit from the use of a forest will not contribute to its long-term sustainability. For many uses of a forest, one person’s harvesting subtracts products that are not available to others. Thus, many aspects of forests can be considered as common-pool resources. Common-pool resources are characterized by difficulty of exclusion and generate finite quantities of resource units so that one person’s use subtracts from the quantity of resource available to others (E. Ostrom, Gardner and Walker 1994). The ecosystem services generated by forest resources – watershed protection, carbon sequestration, biodiversity enhancement, etc. – may be considered as externalities or as public goods. Ecosystem services are, however, closely tied to the sustainability of the forest stock, and are thus threatened by the same set of incentives that tempt users of an unregulated forest resource into a race to use up the timber and destroy the forest itself. Destruction or degradation of forest resources are most likely to occur in open access forests where those involved and/or external authorities have not established an effective governance regime to regulate the following: • Who is allowed to appropriate forest products; • The timing, quantity, location, and technology of appropriation; • Who is obligated to contribute resources to provide or maintain the forest; • How appropriation and obligation activities are to be monitored and enforced; • How conflicts over appropriation and obligation activities are to be resolved; and, • How the rules affecting the above will be changed over time with changes in the extent and composition of the forest and the strategies of participants. A self-governed forest resource is one where actors, who are major appropriators from the forest, are involved over time in making and adapting rules within collective-choice arenas regarding the inclusion or exclusion of participants, appropriation strategies, obligations of participants, monitoring and sanctioning, and conflict resolution. Some extremely remote forests are governed entirely by appropriators and are not governed at all by external authorities. In most modern political-economies, however, it is rare to find any resource system – including the treasuries of private for-profit corporations – that are governed entirely by participants without rules made by local, regional, national, and international authorities also affecting key decisions (V. Ostrom 1991, 1997). Thus, in a self-governed system, participants make many, but not all, rules that affect the sustainability of the resource system and its use.