- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 France, France, United States, Germany, France, France, France, France, FinlandPublisher:Elsevier BV Claas Nendel; Eckart Priesack; Enli Wang; Jon I. Lizaso; Albert Olioso; James W. Jones; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Kenneth J. Boote; Remy Manderscheid; Julián Ramírez Villegas; Julián Ramírez Villegas; Heidi Webber; Florian Heinlein; Zhigan Zhao; Bruno Basso; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Thomas Gaiser; Reimund P. Rötter; Patrick Bertuzzi; Christian Baron; Sabine I. Seidel; Sebastian Gayler; Kenel Delusca; Dominique Ripoche; Amit Kumar Srivastava; Tracy E. Twine; Christoph Müller; F. Ewert; Christian Biernath; Jean-Louis Durand; Lajpat R. Ahuja; Hans Johachim Weigel; Delphine Deryng; Saseendran S. Anapalli; Soo-Hyung Kim; Fulu Tao; Alex C. Ruane; Dennis Timlin;handle: 10568/79936
This study assesses the ability of 21 crop models to capture the impact of elevated CO2 concentration ([CO2]) on maize yield and water use as measured in a 2-year Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment experiment conducted at the Thunen Institute in Braunschweig, Germany (Manderscheid et al., 2014). Data for ambient [CO2] and irrigated treatments were provided to the 21 models for calibrating plant traits, including weather, soil and management data as well as yield, grain number, above ground biomass, leaf area index, nitrogen concentration in biomass and grain, water use and soil water content. Models differed in their representation of carbon assimilation and evapotranspiration processes. The models reproduced the absence of yield response to elevated [CO2] under well-watered conditions, as well as the impact of water deficit at ambient [CO2], with 50% of models within a range of +/−1 Mg ha−1 around the mean. The bias of the median of the 21 models was less than 1 Mg ha−1. However under water deficit in one of the two years, the models captured only 30% of the exceptionally high [CO2] enhancement on yield observed. Furthermore the ensemble of models was unable to simulate the very low soil water content at anthesis and the increase of soil water and grain number brought about by the elevated [CO2] under dry conditions. Overall, we found models with explicit stomatal control on transpiration tended to perform better. Our results highlight the need for model improvement with respect to simulating transpirational water use and its impact on water status during the kernel-set phase.
University of Florid... arrow_drop_down University of Florida: Digital Library CenterArticle . 2017License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/LS00590868/00001Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79936Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)Article . 2017Data sources: Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverEuropean Journal of AgronomyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefPublication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.eja.2017.01.002&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 80 citations 80 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert University of Florid... arrow_drop_down University of Florida: Digital Library CenterArticle . 2017License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/LS00590868/00001Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79936Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)Article . 2017Data sources: Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverEuropean Journal of AgronomyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefPublication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.eja.2017.01.002&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017 Germany, FinlandPublisher:Elsevier BV Tao, Fulu; Xiao, Dengpan; Zhang, Shuai; Zhang, Zhao; Rötter, Reimund P.;Abstract Our understanding of climate impacts and adaptations on crop growth and productivity can be accelerated by analyzing historical data over the past few decades. We used crop trial and climate data from 1981 to 2009 at 34 national agro-meteorological stations in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain (HHHP) of China to investigate the impacts of climate factors during different growth stages on the growth and yields of winter wheat, accounting for the adaptations such as shifts in sowing dates, cultivars, and agronomic management. Maximum (Tmax) and minimum temperature (Tmin) during the growth period of winter wheat increased significantly, by 0.4 and 0.6 °C/decade, respectively, from 1981 to 2009, while solar radiation decreased significantly by 0.2 MJ/m2/day and precipitation did not change significantly. The trends in climate shifted wheat phenology significantly at 21 stations and affected wheat yields significantly at five stations. The impacts of Tmax and Tmin differed in different growth stages of winter wheat. Across the stations, during 1981–2009, wheat yields increased on average by 14.5% with increasing trends in Tmin over the whole growth period, which reduced frost damage, however, decreased by 3.0% with the decreasing trends in solar radiation. Trends in Tmax and precipitation had comparatively smaller impacts on wheat yields. From 1981 to 2009, climate trends were associated with a ≤ 30% (or ≤1.0% per year) wheat yield increase at 23 stations in eastern and southern parts of HHHP; however with a ≤ 30% (or ≤1.0% per year) reduction at 11 other stations, mainly in western part of HHHP. We also found that wheat reproductive growth duration increased due to shifts in cultivars and flowering date, and the duration was significantly and positively correlated with wheat yield. This study highlights the different impacts of Tmax and Tmin in different growth stages of winter wheat, as well as the importance of management (e.g. shift of sowing date) and cultivars shift in adapting to climate change in the major wheat production region.
Agricultural and For... arrow_drop_down Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.033&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 98 citations 98 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Agricultural and For... arrow_drop_down Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.033&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018 FinlandPublisher:Copernicus GmbH R. Zhai; R. Zhai; F. Tao; F. Tao; F. Tao; Z. Xu;Abstract. The Paris Agreement set a long-term temperature goal of holding the global average temperature increase to below 2.0 ∘C above pre-industrial levels, pursuing efforts to limit this to 1.5 ∘C; it is therefore important to understand the impacts of climate change under 1.5 and 2.0 ∘C warming scenarios for climate adaptation and mitigation. Here, climate scenarios from four global circulation models (GCMs) for the baseline (2006–2015), 1.5, and 2.0 ∘C warming scenarios (2106–2115) were used to drive the validated Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrological model to investigate the impacts of global warming on runoff and terrestrial ecosystem water retention (TEWR) across China at a spatial resolution of 0.5∘. This study applied ensemble projections from multiple GCMs to provide more comprehensive and robust results. The trends in annual mean temperature, precipitation, runoff, and TEWR were analyzed at the grid and basin scale. Results showed that median change in runoff ranged from 3.61 to 13.86 %, 4.20 to 17.89 %, and median change in TEWR ranged from −0.45 to 6.71 and −3.48 to 4.40 % in the 10 main basins in China under 1.5 and 2.0 ∘C warming scenarios, respectively, across all four GCMs. The interannual variability of runoff increased notably in areas where it was projected to increase, and the interannual variability increased notably from the 1.5 to the 2.0 ∘C warming scenario. In contrast, TEWR would remain relatively stable, the median change in standard deviation (SD) of TEWR ranged from −10 to 10 % in about 90 % grids under 1.5 and 2.0 ∘C warming scenarios, across all four GCMs. Both low and high runoff would increase under the two warming scenarios in most areas across China, with high runoff increasing more. The risks of low and high runoff events would be higher under the 2.0 than under the 1.5 ∘C warming scenario in terms of both extent and intensity. Runoff was significantly positively correlated to precipitation, while increase in maximum temperature would generally cause runoff to decrease through increasing evapotranspiration. Likewise, precipitation also played a dominant role in affecting TEWR. Our results were supported by previous studies. However, there existed large uncertainties in climate scenarios from different GCMs, which led to large uncertainties in impact assessment. The differences among the four GCMs were larger than differences between the two warming scenarios. Our findings on the spatiotemporal patterns of climate impacts and their shifts from the 1.5 to the 2.0 ∘C warming scenario are useful for water resource management under different warming scenarios.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/esd-9-717-2018&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 25 citations 25 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/esd-9-717-2018&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2015 France, France, France, France, France, France, Germany, Netherlands, France, France, France, Finland, United Kingdom, ItalyPublisher:Elsevier BV Donald S. Gaydon; Simone Bregaglio; R. Goldberg; Manuel Marcaida; Garry O'Leary; Pierre Stratonovitch; Maria Virginia Pravia; Federico Sau; Philippe Oriol; T. Hasegawa; Joost Wolf; Jerry L. Hatfield; Maria I. Travasso; Bruno Basso; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Patricio Grassini; Tom M. Osborne; Bas A. M. Bouman; Simona Bassu; Claudio O. Stöckle; Peter J. Thorburn; Robert F. Grant; Steven Hoek; Pasquale Steduto; R.E.E. Jongschaap; R.E.E. Jongschaap; Katharina Waha; Katharina Waha; Pierre Martre; Roberto Confalonieri; Jordi Doltra; Daniel Wallach; G. De Sanctis; Senthold Asseng; Balwinder Singh; R. A. Kemanian; Reimund P. Rötter; Jon I. Lizaso; Françoise Ruget; Françoise Ruget; Sebastian Gayler; Nadine Brisson; Nadine Brisson; Tao Li; Marc Corbeels; Marc Corbeels; Kenneth J. Boote; H. K. Soo; Eckart Priesack; Alex C. Ruane; Iurii Shcherbak; T. Palosuo; Hiroshi Nakagawa; L. A. Hunt; James W. Jones; Jes Olesen; S. Naresh Kumar; Carlos Angulo; James Williams; Joachim Ingwersen; Zhengtao Zhang; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Anthony Challinor; Christoph Müller; J. Hooker; Iwan Supit; Christian Biernath; Myriam Adam; Davide Cammarano; Mikhail A. Semenov; Paul W. Wilkens; Upendra Singh; Jean-Louis Durand; Xinyou Yin; Samuel Buis; Edmar Teixeira; Liang Tang; David Makowski; Frank Ewert; Christian Baron; Thilo Streck; Patrick Bertuzzi; Delphine Deryng; Soo-Hyung Kim; J.G. Conijn; Yan Zhu; H. Yoshida; Tamon Fumoto; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Jeffrey W. White; Hendrik Boogaard; Fulu Tao; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Dominique Ripoche; L. Heng; C. Nendel; Dennis Timlin;handle: 2434/459056 , 10568/76575 , 10900/70388
Ensembles of process-based crop models are increasingly used to simulate crop growth for scenarios of temperature and/or precipitation changes corresponding to different projections of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This approach generates large datasets with thousands of simulated crop yield data. Such datasets potentially provide new information but it is difficult to summarize them in a useful way due to their structural complexities. An associated issue is that it is not straightforward to compare crops and to interpolate the results to alternative climate scenarios not initially included in the simulation protocols. Here we demonstrate that statistical models based on random-coefficient regressions are able to emulate ensembles of process-based crop models. An important advantage of the proposed statistical models is that they can interpolate between temperature levels and between CO2 concentration levels, and can thus be used to calculate temperature and [CO2] thresholds leading to yield loss or yield gain, without re-running the original complex crop models. Our approach is illustrated with three yield datasets simulated by 19 maize models, 26 wheat models, and 13 rice models. Several statistical models are fitted to these datasets, and are then used to analyze the variability of the yield response to [CO2] and temperature. Based on our results, we show that, for wheat, a [CO2] increase is likely to outweigh the negative effect of a temperature increase of +2°C in the considered sites. Compared to wheat, required levels of [CO2] increase are much higher for maize, and intermediate for rice. For all crops, uncertainties in simulating climate change impacts increase more with temperature than with elevated [CO2].
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76575Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2015Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverAgricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2015Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 35 citations 35 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76575Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2015Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverAgricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2015Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022 FinlandPublisher:Elsevier BV Zhang, Liangliang; Zhang, Zhao; Chen; Yi; Tao, Fulu;2022
Agricultural and For... arrow_drop_down Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108865&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu39 citations 39 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Agricultural and For... arrow_drop_down Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108865&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022 FinlandPublisher:American Geophysical Union (AGU) Yin, Lichang; Tao, Fulu; Zhai, Ran; Chen, Yi; Hu, Jian; Wang, Zhenghui; Fu; Bojie;doi: 10.1029/2021ef002138
AbstractTerrestrial ecosystem water retention (TEWR) service is subject to climate change and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration (eCO2), however, the relevant processes by which future climate change and eCO2 affect TEWR are poorly understood. Here, we use the factorial simulation experiments from the Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project to address this research question. The experiments are based on three dynamic global vegetation models forced with the same climate change scenarios. Results suggest that compared to the preindustrial level, during 2070–2099, (a) TEWR change is highly uncertain, especially in the Southern Hemisphere. (b) Climate change will dominate the pattern of future TEWR change compared with eCO2. (c) Precipitation and runoff change will dominate the future TEWR change in various regions, and the direct role of evapotranspiration (ET) on TEWR will be relatively small. (d) eCO2 will mainly affect vegetation dynamics in energy‐limited regions to affect the runoff, and consequently affecting TEWR change. (e) eCO2 will decrease ET and increase the runoff, resulting in a slight TWER change. These findings improve the understanding of the responses of TEWR to future climate change and eCO2.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1029/2021ef002138&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1029/2021ef002138&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2013 Germany, France, France, France, France, Finland, France, United Kingdom, FrancePublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC L. A. Hunt; James W. Jones; S. Naresh Kumar; Carlos Angulo; Katharina Waha; Senthold Asseng; R. Goldberg; Garry O'Leary; Kenneth J. Boote; Bruno Basso; Jerry L. Hatfield; Sebastian Gayler; Maria I. Travasso; Reimund P. Rötter; Andrew J. Challinor; Andrew J. Challinor; Nadine Brisson; Nadine Brisson; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Jørgen E. Olesen; Claas Nendel; Claudio O. Stöckle; Peter J. Thorburn; Robert F. Grant; Tom M. Osborne; Pasquale Steduto; Pierre Martre; Pierre Martre; Jordi Doltra; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Taru Palosuo; Daniel Wallach; Pierre Stratonovitch; Fulu Tao; Joost Wolf; Davide Cammarano; Mikhail A. Semenov; Frank Ewert; Iurii Shcherbak; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Jeffrey W. White; James Williams; Joachim Ingwersen; Christoph Müller; J. Hooker; Eckart Priesack; Dominique Ripoche; L. Heng; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Alex C. Ruane; Thilo Streck; Iwan Supit; Christian Biernath; Patrick Bertuzzi;doi: 10.1038/nclimate1916
handle: 10568/51414 , 10900/41605
Projections of climate change impacts on crop yields are inherently uncertain(1). Uncertainty is often quantified when projecting future greenhouse gas emissions and their influence on climate(2). However, multi-model uncertainty analysis of crop responses to climate change is rare because systematic and objective comparisons among process-based crop simulation models(1,3) are difficult(4). Here we present the largest standardized model intercomparison for climate change impacts so far. We found that individual crop models are able to simulate measured wheat grain yields accurately under a range of environments, particularly if the input information is sufficient. However, simulated climate change impacts vary across models owing to differences in model structures and parameter values. A greater proportion of the uncertainty in climate change impact projections was due to variations among crop models than to variations among downscaled general circulation models. Uncertainties in simulated impacts increased with CO2 concentrations and associated warming. These impact uncertainties can be reduced by improving temperature and CO2 relationships in models and better quantified through use of multi-model ensembles. Less uncertainty in describing how climate change may affect agricultural productivity will aid adaptation strategy development and policymaking.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2014Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/51414Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2013Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate1916&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 1K citations 1,071 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 0.1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2014Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/51414Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2013Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate1916&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2016 Netherlands, France, France, United Kingdom, Finland, France, France, Germany, FrancePublisher:Elsevier BV Claudio O. Stöckle; Fulu Tao; Bruno Basso; R. Goldberg; Thilo Streck; L. A. Hunt; Iurii Shcherbak; James W. Jones; Kenneth J. Boote; Christoph Müller; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Carlos Angulo; J. Hooker; Maria I. Travasso; Claas Nendel; Davide Cammarano; Sebastian Gayler; Mikhail A. Semenov; Dominique Ripoche; Pierre Stratonovitch; Iwan Supit; Katharina Waha; Jørgen E. Olesen; Pasquale Steduto; Christian Biernath; Soora Naresh Kumar; Eckart Priesack; Garry O'Leary; Tom M. Osborne; Frank Ewert; Senthold Asseng; Lee Heng; Jerry L. Hatfield; Pierre Martre; Pierre Martre; Jordi Doltra; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Reimund P. Rötter; Andrew J. Challinor; Andrew J. Challinor; Taru Palosuo; Daniel Wallach; Patrick Bertuzzi; Joost Wolf; Nadine Brisson; Nadine Brisson; Joachim Ingwersen; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Peter J. Thorburn; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Jeffrey W. White; Alex C. Ruane;handle: 10568/77178 , 10900/83784
Projected global warming and population growth will reduce future water availability for agriculture. Thus, it is essential to increase the efficiency in using water to ensure crop productivity. Quantifying crop water use (WU; i.e. actual evapotranspiration) is a critical step towards this goal. Here, sixteen wheat simulation models were used to quantify sources of model uncertainty and to estimate the relative changes and variability between models for simulated WU, water use efficiency (WUE, WU per unit of grain dry mass produced), transpiration efficiency (Teff, transpiration per kg of unit of grain yield dry mass produced), grain yield, crop transpiration and soil evaporation at increased temperatures and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations ([CO2]). The greatest uncertainty in simulating water use, potential evapotranspiration, crop transpiration and soil evaporation was due to differences in how crop transpiration was modelled and accounted for 50% of the total variability among models. The simulation results for the sensitivity to temperature indicated that crop WU will decline with increasing temperature due to reduced growing seasons. The uncertainties in simulated crop WU, and in particularly due to uncertainties in simulating crop transpiration, were greater under conditions of increased temperatures and with high temperatures in combination with elevated atmospheric [CO2] concentrations. Hence the simulation of crop WU, and in particularly crop transpiration under higher temperature, needs to be improved and evaluated with field measurements before models can be used to simulate climate change impacts on future crop water demand.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77178Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2016License: CC BY SAData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.015&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 53 citations 53 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77178Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2016License: CC BY SAData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.015&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 FinlandPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Xiao, D.; Tao, Fulu;pmid: 26589829
The impact of climate change on crop yield is compounded by cultivar shifts and agronomic management practices. To determine the relative contributions of climate change, cultivar shift, and management practice to changes in maize (Zea mays L.) yield in the past three decades, detailed field data for 1981-2009 from four representative experimental stations in North China Plain (NCP) were analyzed via model simulation. The four representative experimental stations are geographically and climatologically different, represent the typical cropping system in the study area, and have more complete weather/crop records for the period of 1981-2009. The results showed that while the shift from traditional to modern cultivar increased yield by 23.9-40.3 %, new fertilizer management increased yield by 3.3-8.6 %. However, the trends in climate variables for 1981-2009 reduced maize yield by 15-30 % in the study area. Among the main climate variables, solar radiation had the largest effect on maize yield, followed by temperature and then precipitation. While a significant decline in solar radiation in 1981-2009 (maybe due to air pollution) reduced yield by 12-24 %, a significant increase in temperature reduced yield by 3-9 %. In contrast, a non-significant increase in precipitation during the maize growth period increased yield by 0.9-3 % at three of the four investigated stations. However, a decline in precipitation reduced yield by 3 % in the remaining station. The study revealed that although the shift from traditional to modern cultivars and agronomic management practices contributed most to the increase in maize yield, the negative impact of climate change was large enough to offset 46-67 % of the trend in the observed yields in the past three decades in NCP. The reduction in solar radiation, especially in the most critical period of maize growth, limited the process of photosynthesis and thereby further reduced maize yield.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of BiometeorologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00484-015-1104-9&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 55 citations 55 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of BiometeorologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00484-015-1104-9&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017 FinlandPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Zhao Zhang; Yi Chen; Xing Wei; Pin Wang; Fulu Tao; Fulu Tao;Increasing population, limited land resources, and the demand for environmental protection highlight the urgency of improving crop yield on the limited cultivated land. To identify a possible food supply under a sustainable intensification of agricultural production, it is necessary to accurately estimate yield potentials and yield gaps. Here, we used a well-validated, large-scale process-based crop model, Model to capture the Crop-weather relationship over a Large Area for rice, and an ensemble model simulation method to estimate the yield potential across the rice planting area of China. We further evaluated the spatiotemporal patterns of actual yield, yield potential, and yield gap over the past three decades. Rice yield showed an increasing trend in more than 95% of the studied counties. However, 48.3% of the counties were already experiencing yield stagnation. The yield potential in northeast China had increased over the past three decades by 20–40 kg/ha per year because of the increase in temperature, while the increased temperature and decreased solar radiation reduced the yield potentials in other regions by 10–30 kg/ha per year. Because of changes in the actual yield and yield potential, the yield gap decreased in 93.4% of the counties by an average of 0.5–2% per year, resulting in less room for yield improvement. Additionally, 65.9% of the counties had nearly approached their yield ceilings (>70% of the yield potential). Our study highlights that popularizing advanced management technologies to close yield gaps and breeding climate-resilient cultivars to expand yield potentials should be of equal importance for the sustainable development of agricultural production and food security.
Regional Environment... arrow_drop_down Regional Environmental ChangeArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefNatural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10113-017-1168-7&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu17 citations 17 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Regional Environment... arrow_drop_down Regional Environmental ChangeArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefNatural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10113-017-1168-7&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 France, France, United States, Germany, France, France, France, France, FinlandPublisher:Elsevier BV Claas Nendel; Eckart Priesack; Enli Wang; Jon I. Lizaso; Albert Olioso; James W. Jones; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Kenneth J. Boote; Remy Manderscheid; Julián Ramírez Villegas; Julián Ramírez Villegas; Heidi Webber; Florian Heinlein; Zhigan Zhao; Bruno Basso; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Thomas Gaiser; Reimund P. Rötter; Patrick Bertuzzi; Christian Baron; Sabine I. Seidel; Sebastian Gayler; Kenel Delusca; Dominique Ripoche; Amit Kumar Srivastava; Tracy E. Twine; Christoph Müller; F. Ewert; Christian Biernath; Jean-Louis Durand; Lajpat R. Ahuja; Hans Johachim Weigel; Delphine Deryng; Saseendran S. Anapalli; Soo-Hyung Kim; Fulu Tao; Alex C. Ruane; Dennis Timlin;handle: 10568/79936
This study assesses the ability of 21 crop models to capture the impact of elevated CO2 concentration ([CO2]) on maize yield and water use as measured in a 2-year Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment experiment conducted at the Thunen Institute in Braunschweig, Germany (Manderscheid et al., 2014). Data for ambient [CO2] and irrigated treatments were provided to the 21 models for calibrating plant traits, including weather, soil and management data as well as yield, grain number, above ground biomass, leaf area index, nitrogen concentration in biomass and grain, water use and soil water content. Models differed in their representation of carbon assimilation and evapotranspiration processes. The models reproduced the absence of yield response to elevated [CO2] under well-watered conditions, as well as the impact of water deficit at ambient [CO2], with 50% of models within a range of +/−1 Mg ha−1 around the mean. The bias of the median of the 21 models was less than 1 Mg ha−1. However under water deficit in one of the two years, the models captured only 30% of the exceptionally high [CO2] enhancement on yield observed. Furthermore the ensemble of models was unable to simulate the very low soil water content at anthesis and the increase of soil water and grain number brought about by the elevated [CO2] under dry conditions. Overall, we found models with explicit stomatal control on transpiration tended to perform better. Our results highlight the need for model improvement with respect to simulating transpirational water use and its impact on water status during the kernel-set phase.
University of Florid... arrow_drop_down University of Florida: Digital Library CenterArticle . 2017License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/LS00590868/00001Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79936Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)Article . 2017Data sources: Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverEuropean Journal of AgronomyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefPublication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.eja.2017.01.002&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 80 citations 80 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert University of Florid... arrow_drop_down University of Florida: Digital Library CenterArticle . 2017License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/LS00590868/00001Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2017Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79936Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)Article . 2017Data sources: Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (PuSH)INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2017Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverEuropean Journal of AgronomyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefPublication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2018Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.eja.2017.01.002&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017 Germany, FinlandPublisher:Elsevier BV Tao, Fulu; Xiao, Dengpan; Zhang, Shuai; Zhang, Zhao; Rötter, Reimund P.;Abstract Our understanding of climate impacts and adaptations on crop growth and productivity can be accelerated by analyzing historical data over the past few decades. We used crop trial and climate data from 1981 to 2009 at 34 national agro-meteorological stations in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain (HHHP) of China to investigate the impacts of climate factors during different growth stages on the growth and yields of winter wheat, accounting for the adaptations such as shifts in sowing dates, cultivars, and agronomic management. Maximum (Tmax) and minimum temperature (Tmin) during the growth period of winter wheat increased significantly, by 0.4 and 0.6 °C/decade, respectively, from 1981 to 2009, while solar radiation decreased significantly by 0.2 MJ/m2/day and precipitation did not change significantly. The trends in climate shifted wheat phenology significantly at 21 stations and affected wheat yields significantly at five stations. The impacts of Tmax and Tmin differed in different growth stages of winter wheat. Across the stations, during 1981–2009, wheat yields increased on average by 14.5% with increasing trends in Tmin over the whole growth period, which reduced frost damage, however, decreased by 3.0% with the decreasing trends in solar radiation. Trends in Tmax and precipitation had comparatively smaller impacts on wheat yields. From 1981 to 2009, climate trends were associated with a ≤ 30% (or ≤1.0% per year) wheat yield increase at 23 stations in eastern and southern parts of HHHP; however with a ≤ 30% (or ≤1.0% per year) reduction at 11 other stations, mainly in western part of HHHP. We also found that wheat reproductive growth duration increased due to shifts in cultivars and flowering date, and the duration was significantly and positively correlated with wheat yield. This study highlights the different impacts of Tmax and Tmin in different growth stages of winter wheat, as well as the importance of management (e.g. shift of sowing date) and cultivars shift in adapting to climate change in the major wheat production region.
Agricultural and For... arrow_drop_down Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.033&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 98 citations 98 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Agricultural and For... arrow_drop_down Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.033&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2018 FinlandPublisher:Copernicus GmbH R. Zhai; R. Zhai; F. Tao; F. Tao; F. Tao; Z. Xu;Abstract. The Paris Agreement set a long-term temperature goal of holding the global average temperature increase to below 2.0 ∘C above pre-industrial levels, pursuing efforts to limit this to 1.5 ∘C; it is therefore important to understand the impacts of climate change under 1.5 and 2.0 ∘C warming scenarios for climate adaptation and mitigation. Here, climate scenarios from four global circulation models (GCMs) for the baseline (2006–2015), 1.5, and 2.0 ∘C warming scenarios (2106–2115) were used to drive the validated Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrological model to investigate the impacts of global warming on runoff and terrestrial ecosystem water retention (TEWR) across China at a spatial resolution of 0.5∘. This study applied ensemble projections from multiple GCMs to provide more comprehensive and robust results. The trends in annual mean temperature, precipitation, runoff, and TEWR were analyzed at the grid and basin scale. Results showed that median change in runoff ranged from 3.61 to 13.86 %, 4.20 to 17.89 %, and median change in TEWR ranged from −0.45 to 6.71 and −3.48 to 4.40 % in the 10 main basins in China under 1.5 and 2.0 ∘C warming scenarios, respectively, across all four GCMs. The interannual variability of runoff increased notably in areas where it was projected to increase, and the interannual variability increased notably from the 1.5 to the 2.0 ∘C warming scenario. In contrast, TEWR would remain relatively stable, the median change in standard deviation (SD) of TEWR ranged from −10 to 10 % in about 90 % grids under 1.5 and 2.0 ∘C warming scenarios, across all four GCMs. Both low and high runoff would increase under the two warming scenarios in most areas across China, with high runoff increasing more. The risks of low and high runoff events would be higher under the 2.0 than under the 1.5 ∘C warming scenario in terms of both extent and intensity. Runoff was significantly positively correlated to precipitation, while increase in maximum temperature would generally cause runoff to decrease through increasing evapotranspiration. Likewise, precipitation also played a dominant role in affecting TEWR. Our results were supported by previous studies. However, there existed large uncertainties in climate scenarios from different GCMs, which led to large uncertainties in impact assessment. The differences among the four GCMs were larger than differences between the two warming scenarios. Our findings on the spatiotemporal patterns of climate impacts and their shifts from the 1.5 to the 2.0 ∘C warming scenario are useful for water resource management under different warming scenarios.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/esd-9-717-2018&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 25 citations 25 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5194/esd-9-717-2018&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2015 France, France, France, France, France, France, Germany, Netherlands, France, France, France, Finland, United Kingdom, ItalyPublisher:Elsevier BV Donald S. Gaydon; Simone Bregaglio; R. Goldberg; Manuel Marcaida; Garry O'Leary; Pierre Stratonovitch; Maria Virginia Pravia; Federico Sau; Philippe Oriol; T. Hasegawa; Joost Wolf; Jerry L. Hatfield; Maria I. Travasso; Bruno Basso; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Patricio Grassini; Tom M. Osborne; Bas A. M. Bouman; Simona Bassu; Claudio O. Stöckle; Peter J. Thorburn; Robert F. Grant; Steven Hoek; Pasquale Steduto; R.E.E. Jongschaap; R.E.E. Jongschaap; Katharina Waha; Katharina Waha; Pierre Martre; Roberto Confalonieri; Jordi Doltra; Daniel Wallach; G. De Sanctis; Senthold Asseng; Balwinder Singh; R. A. Kemanian; Reimund P. Rötter; Jon I. Lizaso; Françoise Ruget; Françoise Ruget; Sebastian Gayler; Nadine Brisson; Nadine Brisson; Tao Li; Marc Corbeels; Marc Corbeels; Kenneth J. Boote; H. K. Soo; Eckart Priesack; Alex C. Ruane; Iurii Shcherbak; T. Palosuo; Hiroshi Nakagawa; L. A. Hunt; James W. Jones; Jes Olesen; S. Naresh Kumar; Carlos Angulo; James Williams; Joachim Ingwersen; Zhengtao Zhang; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Anthony Challinor; Christoph Müller; J. Hooker; Iwan Supit; Christian Biernath; Myriam Adam; Davide Cammarano; Mikhail A. Semenov; Paul W. Wilkens; Upendra Singh; Jean-Louis Durand; Xinyou Yin; Samuel Buis; Edmar Teixeira; Liang Tang; David Makowski; Frank Ewert; Christian Baron; Thilo Streck; Patrick Bertuzzi; Delphine Deryng; Soo-Hyung Kim; J.G. Conijn; Yan Zhu; H. Yoshida; Tamon Fumoto; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Jeffrey W. White; Hendrik Boogaard; Fulu Tao; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Dominique Ripoche; L. Heng; C. Nendel; Dennis Timlin;handle: 2434/459056 , 10568/76575 , 10900/70388
Ensembles of process-based crop models are increasingly used to simulate crop growth for scenarios of temperature and/or precipitation changes corresponding to different projections of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This approach generates large datasets with thousands of simulated crop yield data. Such datasets potentially provide new information but it is difficult to summarize them in a useful way due to their structural complexities. An associated issue is that it is not straightforward to compare crops and to interpolate the results to alternative climate scenarios not initially included in the simulation protocols. Here we demonstrate that statistical models based on random-coefficient regressions are able to emulate ensembles of process-based crop models. An important advantage of the proposed statistical models is that they can interpolate between temperature levels and between CO2 concentration levels, and can thus be used to calculate temperature and [CO2] thresholds leading to yield loss or yield gain, without re-running the original complex crop models. Our approach is illustrated with three yield datasets simulated by 19 maize models, 26 wheat models, and 13 rice models. Several statistical models are fitted to these datasets, and are then used to analyze the variability of the yield response to [CO2] and temperature. Based on our results, we show that, for wheat, a [CO2] increase is likely to outweigh the negative effect of a temperature increase of +2°C in the considered sites. Compared to wheat, required levels of [CO2] increase are much higher for maize, and intermediate for rice. For all crops, uncertainties in simulating climate change impacts increase more with temperature than with elevated [CO2].
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76575Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2015Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverAgricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2015Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 35 citations 35 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76575Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2015Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverAgricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2015Data sources: DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: CrossrefEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)CIRAD: HAL (Agricultural Research for Development)Article . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2015Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022 FinlandPublisher:Elsevier BV Zhang, Liangliang; Zhang, Zhao; Chen; Yi; Tao, Fulu;2022
Agricultural and For... arrow_drop_down Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108865&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu39 citations 39 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Agricultural and For... arrow_drop_down Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108865&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022 FinlandPublisher:American Geophysical Union (AGU) Yin, Lichang; Tao, Fulu; Zhai, Ran; Chen, Yi; Hu, Jian; Wang, Zhenghui; Fu; Bojie;doi: 10.1029/2021ef002138
AbstractTerrestrial ecosystem water retention (TEWR) service is subject to climate change and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration (eCO2), however, the relevant processes by which future climate change and eCO2 affect TEWR are poorly understood. Here, we use the factorial simulation experiments from the Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project to address this research question. The experiments are based on three dynamic global vegetation models forced with the same climate change scenarios. Results suggest that compared to the preindustrial level, during 2070–2099, (a) TEWR change is highly uncertain, especially in the Southern Hemisphere. (b) Climate change will dominate the pattern of future TEWR change compared with eCO2. (c) Precipitation and runoff change will dominate the future TEWR change in various regions, and the direct role of evapotranspiration (ET) on TEWR will be relatively small. (d) eCO2 will mainly affect vegetation dynamics in energy‐limited regions to affect the runoff, and consequently affecting TEWR change. (e) eCO2 will decrease ET and increase the runoff, resulting in a slight TWER change. These findings improve the understanding of the responses of TEWR to future climate change and eCO2.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1029/2021ef002138&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1029/2021ef002138&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2013 Germany, France, France, France, France, Finland, France, United Kingdom, FrancePublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC L. A. Hunt; James W. Jones; S. Naresh Kumar; Carlos Angulo; Katharina Waha; Senthold Asseng; R. Goldberg; Garry O'Leary; Kenneth J. Boote; Bruno Basso; Jerry L. Hatfield; Sebastian Gayler; Maria I. Travasso; Reimund P. Rötter; Andrew J. Challinor; Andrew J. Challinor; Nadine Brisson; Nadine Brisson; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Jørgen E. Olesen; Claas Nendel; Claudio O. Stöckle; Peter J. Thorburn; Robert F. Grant; Tom M. Osborne; Pasquale Steduto; Pierre Martre; Pierre Martre; Jordi Doltra; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Taru Palosuo; Daniel Wallach; Pierre Stratonovitch; Fulu Tao; Joost Wolf; Davide Cammarano; Mikhail A. Semenov; Frank Ewert; Iurii Shcherbak; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Jeffrey W. White; James Williams; Joachim Ingwersen; Christoph Müller; J. Hooker; Eckart Priesack; Dominique Ripoche; L. Heng; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Alex C. Ruane; Thilo Streck; Iwan Supit; Christian Biernath; Patrick Bertuzzi;doi: 10.1038/nclimate1916
handle: 10568/51414 , 10900/41605
Projections of climate change impacts on crop yields are inherently uncertain(1). Uncertainty is often quantified when projecting future greenhouse gas emissions and their influence on climate(2). However, multi-model uncertainty analysis of crop responses to climate change is rare because systematic and objective comparisons among process-based crop simulation models(1,3) are difficult(4). Here we present the largest standardized model intercomparison for climate change impacts so far. We found that individual crop models are able to simulate measured wheat grain yields accurately under a range of environments, particularly if the input information is sufficient. However, simulated climate change impacts vary across models owing to differences in model structures and parameter values. A greater proportion of the uncertainty in climate change impact projections was due to variations among crop models than to variations among downscaled general circulation models. Uncertainties in simulated impacts increased with CO2 concentrations and associated warming. These impact uncertainties can be reduced by improving temperature and CO2 relationships in models and better quantified through use of multi-model ensembles. Less uncertainty in describing how climate change may affect agricultural productivity will aid adaptation strategy development and policymaking.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2014Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/51414Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2013Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate1916&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen bronze 1K citations 1,071 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 0.1% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2014Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/51414Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2018INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverArticle . 2013Data sources: INRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverEberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2013Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate1916&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2016 Netherlands, France, France, United Kingdom, Finland, France, France, Germany, FrancePublisher:Elsevier BV Claudio O. Stöckle; Fulu Tao; Bruno Basso; R. Goldberg; Thilo Streck; L. A. Hunt; Iurii Shcherbak; James W. Jones; Kenneth J. Boote; Christoph Müller; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Carlos Angulo; J. Hooker; Maria I. Travasso; Claas Nendel; Davide Cammarano; Sebastian Gayler; Mikhail A. Semenov; Dominique Ripoche; Pierre Stratonovitch; Iwan Supit; Katharina Waha; Jørgen E. Olesen; Pasquale Steduto; Christian Biernath; Soora Naresh Kumar; Eckart Priesack; Garry O'Leary; Tom M. Osborne; Frank Ewert; Senthold Asseng; Lee Heng; Jerry L. Hatfield; Pierre Martre; Pierre Martre; Jordi Doltra; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Reimund P. Rötter; Andrew J. Challinor; Andrew J. Challinor; Taru Palosuo; Daniel Wallach; Patrick Bertuzzi; Joost Wolf; Nadine Brisson; Nadine Brisson; Joachim Ingwersen; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Peter J. Thorburn; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Jeffrey W. White; Alex C. Ruane;handle: 10568/77178 , 10900/83784
Projected global warming and population growth will reduce future water availability for agriculture. Thus, it is essential to increase the efficiency in using water to ensure crop productivity. Quantifying crop water use (WU; i.e. actual evapotranspiration) is a critical step towards this goal. Here, sixteen wheat simulation models were used to quantify sources of model uncertainty and to estimate the relative changes and variability between models for simulated WU, water use efficiency (WUE, WU per unit of grain dry mass produced), transpiration efficiency (Teff, transpiration per kg of unit of grain yield dry mass produced), grain yield, crop transpiration and soil evaporation at increased temperatures and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations ([CO2]). The greatest uncertainty in simulating water use, potential evapotranspiration, crop transpiration and soil evaporation was due to differences in how crop transpiration was modelled and accounted for 50% of the total variability among models. The simulation results for the sensitivity to temperature indicated that crop WU will decline with increasing temperature due to reduced growing seasons. The uncertainties in simulated crop WU, and in particularly due to uncertainties in simulating crop transpiration, were greater under conditions of increased temperatures and with high temperatures in combination with elevated atmospheric [CO2] concentrations. Hence the simulation of crop WU, and in particularly crop transpiration under higher temperature, needs to be improved and evaluated with field measurements before models can be used to simulate climate change impacts on future crop water demand.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77178Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2016License: CC BY SAData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.015&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 53 citations 53 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2016Full-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77178Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publikationenserver der Georg-August-Universität GöttingenArticle . 2017Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2016License: CC BY SAData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Eberhard Karls University Tübingen: Publication SystemArticle . 2016Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.015&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 FinlandPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Xiao, D.; Tao, Fulu;pmid: 26589829
The impact of climate change on crop yield is compounded by cultivar shifts and agronomic management practices. To determine the relative contributions of climate change, cultivar shift, and management practice to changes in maize (Zea mays L.) yield in the past three decades, detailed field data for 1981-2009 from four representative experimental stations in North China Plain (NCP) were analyzed via model simulation. The four representative experimental stations are geographically and climatologically different, represent the typical cropping system in the study area, and have more complete weather/crop records for the period of 1981-2009. The results showed that while the shift from traditional to modern cultivar increased yield by 23.9-40.3 %, new fertilizer management increased yield by 3.3-8.6 %. However, the trends in climate variables for 1981-2009 reduced maize yield by 15-30 % in the study area. Among the main climate variables, solar radiation had the largest effect on maize yield, followed by temperature and then precipitation. While a significant decline in solar radiation in 1981-2009 (maybe due to air pollution) reduced yield by 12-24 %, a significant increase in temperature reduced yield by 3-9 %. In contrast, a non-significant increase in precipitation during the maize growth period increased yield by 0.9-3 % at three of the four investigated stations. However, a decline in precipitation reduced yield by 3 % in the remaining station. The study revealed that although the shift from traditional to modern cultivars and agronomic management practices contributed most to the increase in maize yield, the negative impact of climate change was large enough to offset 46-67 % of the trend in the observed yields in the past three decades in NCP. The reduction in solar radiation, especially in the most critical period of maize growth, limited the process of photosynthesis and thereby further reduced maize yield.
International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of BiometeorologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00484-015-1104-9&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routeshybrid 55 citations 55 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert International Journa... arrow_drop_down International Journal of BiometeorologyArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s00484-015-1104-9&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2017 FinlandPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Zhao Zhang; Yi Chen; Xing Wei; Pin Wang; Fulu Tao; Fulu Tao;Increasing population, limited land resources, and the demand for environmental protection highlight the urgency of improving crop yield on the limited cultivated land. To identify a possible food supply under a sustainable intensification of agricultural production, it is necessary to accurately estimate yield potentials and yield gaps. Here, we used a well-validated, large-scale process-based crop model, Model to capture the Crop-weather relationship over a Large Area for rice, and an ensemble model simulation method to estimate the yield potential across the rice planting area of China. We further evaluated the spatiotemporal patterns of actual yield, yield potential, and yield gap over the past three decades. Rice yield showed an increasing trend in more than 95% of the studied counties. However, 48.3% of the counties were already experiencing yield stagnation. The yield potential in northeast China had increased over the past three decades by 20–40 kg/ha per year because of the increase in temperature, while the increased temperature and decreased solar radiation reduced the yield potentials in other regions by 10–30 kg/ha per year. Because of changes in the actual yield and yield potential, the yield gap decreased in 93.4% of the counties by an average of 0.5–2% per year, resulting in less room for yield improvement. Additionally, 65.9% of the counties had nearly approached their yield ceilings (>70% of the yield potential). Our study highlights that popularizing advanced management technologies to close yield gaps and breeding climate-resilient cultivars to expand yield potentials should be of equal importance for the sustainable development of agricultural production and food security.
Regional Environment... arrow_drop_down Regional Environmental ChangeArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefNatural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10113-017-1168-7&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu17 citations 17 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Regional Environment... arrow_drop_down Regional Environmental ChangeArticle . 2017 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Springer TDMData sources: CrossrefNatural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1007/s10113-017-1168-7&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu