- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
Year range
-chevron_right GOFunder
Country
Source
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 Finland, Germany, Denmark, France, Sweden, China (People's Republic of), China (People's Republic of), China (People's Republic of), Germany, FinlandPublisher:Wiley Funded by:NSERC, AKA | When ancient meets modern..., NSF | Collaborative Research: U... +18 projectsNSERC ,AKA| When ancient meets modern effect of plant-derived carbon on anaerobic decomposition in arctic permafrost soils (PANDA) ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Using the ITEX-AON network to document and understand terrestrial ecosystem change in the Arctic ,RCN| Winter-proofing land surface models - quantifying the critical role of cold season processes in vegetation-permafrost feedbacks ,NSF| METHANE AT THE ZERO CURTAIN ,AKA| Geomorphic sensitivity of the Arctic region: geohazards and infrastructure (INFRAHAZARD) / Consortium: INFRAHAZARD ,EC| INTAROS ,NSF| IPY: Collaborative Research on Carbon, Water, and Energy Balance of the Arctic Landscape at Flagship Observatories and in a Pan-Arctic Network ,AKA| Methane uptake by permafrost-affected soils – an underestimated carbon sink in Arctic ecosystems? (MUFFIN) ,AKA| Biogeochemical and biophysical feedbacks from forest harvesting to climate change / Consortium: NNNN ,AKA| Novel soil management practices - key for sustainable bioeconomy and climate change mitigation -SOMPA / Consortium: SOMPA ,AKA| Towards constraining the circumarctic nitrous oxide budget (NOCA) ,NSF| Methane loss from Arctic: towards an annual budget of CH4 emissions from tundra ecosystems across a latitudinal gradient ,AKA| Atmosphere and Climate Competence Center (ACCC) ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Research, Synthesis, and Knowledge Transfer in a Changing Arctic: Science Support for the Study of Environmental Arctic Change (SEARCH) ,EC| PAGE21 ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Multi-Regional Scale Aircraft Observations of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Isotopic Fluxes in the Arctic ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Permafrost Carbon Network: Synthesizing flux observations for benchmarking model projections of permafrost carbon exchange ,NSF| Collaborative Research on Carbon, Water, and Energy Balance of the Arctic Landscape at Flagship Observatories in Alaska and Siberia ,NSF| AON: Development of Sustainable Observations of Thermal State of Permafrost in North America and Russia: The U.S. Contribution to the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost ,AKA| Atmosphere and Climate Competence Center (ACCC)Edward A. G. Schuur; Järvi Järveoja; S. Potter; Stef Bokhorst; Marguerite Mauritz; Mats Nilsson; Steven F. Oberbauer; Elyn Humphreys; M. Goeckede; Pertti J. Martikainen; John Kochendorfer; Jinshu Chi; Juha Aalto; Juha Aalto; Jennifer D. Watts; Torben R. Christensen; Matthias Peichl; Oliver Sonnentag; Vincent L. St. Louis; Craig A. Emmerton; Miska Luoto; David Holl; Eugénie S. Euskirchen; Torbern Tagesson; Torbern Tagesson; Sang Jong Park; Gerardo Celis; Margaret S. Torn; Frans-Jan W. Parmentier; Frans-Jan W. Parmentier; Maija E. Marushchak; Maija E. Marushchak; Namyi Chae; Walter C. Oechel; Walter C. Oechel; Masahito Ueyama; Peter M. Lafleur; Christina Biasi; Bo Elberling; Brendan M. Rogers; Han Dolman; Ivan Mammarella; Aleksi Lehtonen; Claire C. Treat; Min Jung Kwon; Carolina Voigt; Carolina Voigt; Hideki Kobayashi; Rafael Poyatos; Susan M. Natali; Hiroki Iwata; Donatella Zona; Donatella Zona; Anna-Maria Virkkala; Efrén López-Blanco; Torsten Sachs;doi: 10.1111/gcb.15659
pmid: 33913236
AbstractThe regional variability in tundra and boreal carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes can be high, complicating efforts to quantify sink‐source patterns across the entire region. Statistical models are increasingly used to predict (i.e., upscale) CO2 fluxes across large spatial domains, but the reliability of different modeling techniques, each with different specifications and assumptions, has not been assessed in detail. Here, we compile eddy covariance and chamber measurements of annual and growing season CO2 fluxes of gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during 1990–2015 from 148 terrestrial high‐latitude (i.e., tundra and boreal) sites to analyze the spatial patterns and drivers of CO2 fluxes and test the accuracy and uncertainty of different statistical models. CO2 fluxes were upscaled at relatively high spatial resolution (1 km2) across the high‐latitude region using five commonly used statistical models and their ensemble, that is, the median of all five models, using climatic, vegetation, and soil predictors. We found the performance of machine learning and ensemble predictions to outperform traditional regression methods. We also found the predictive performance of NEE‐focused models to be low, relative to models predicting GPP and ER. Our data compilation and ensemble predictions showed that CO2 sink strength was larger in the boreal biome (observed and predicted average annual NEE −46 and −29 g C m−2 yr−1, respectively) compared to tundra (average annual NEE +10 and −2 g C m−2 yr−1). This pattern was associated with large spatial variability, reflecting local heterogeneity in soil organic carbon stocks, climate, and vegetation productivity. The terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget, estimated using the annual NEE ensemble prediction, suggests the high‐latitude region was on average an annual CO2 sink during 1990–2015, although uncertainty remains high.
Institut national de... arrow_drop_down Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2021Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03260396Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)Article . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2021Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03260396Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Electronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information CenterUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.15659&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 105 citations 105 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Institut national de... arrow_drop_down Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2021Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03260396Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)Article . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2021Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03260396Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Electronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information CenterUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.15659&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 United StatesPublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | VULCANEC| VULCANE. Pegoraro; V. G. Salmon; Junyi Liang; Junyi Liang; César Plaza; César Plaza; César Plaza; Gerardo Celis; Jizhong Zhou; Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis; Christopher Ryan Penton; Edward A. G. Schuur; Yiqi Luo; Yiqi Luo; Yiqi Luo; Susan M. Natali; James M. Tiedje; Marguerite Mauritz; James R. Cole; Lifen Jiang; Lifen Jiang; Shuang Ma; Shuang Ma; Jiangyang Xia; Zheng Shi; Xingjie Lu; Xingjie Lu;doi: 10.1111/gcb.14325
pmid: 29802797
AbstractClimate warming can result in both abiotic (e.g., permafrost thaw) and biotic (e.g., microbial functional genes) changes in Arctic tundra. Recent research has incorporated dynamic permafrost thaw in Earth system models (ESMs) and indicates that Arctic tundra could be a significant future carbon (C) source due to the enhanced decomposition of thawed deep soil C. However, warming‐induced biotic changes may influence biologically related parameters and the consequent projections inESMs. How model parameters associated with biotic responses will change under warming and to what extent these changes affect projected C budgets have not been carefully examined. In this study, we synthesized six data sets over 5 years from a soil warming experiment at the Eight Mile Lake, Alaska, into the TerrestrialECOsystem (TECO) model with a probabilistic inversion approach. TheTECOmodel used multiple soil layers to track dynamics of thawed soil under different treatments. Our results show that warming increased light use efficiency of vegetation photosynthesis but decreased baseline (i.e., environment‐corrected) turnover rates ofSOCin both the fast and slow pools in comparison with those under control. Moreover, the parameter changes generally amplified over time, suggesting processes of gradual physiological acclimation and functional gene shifts of both plants and microbes. TheTECOmodel predicted that field warming from 2009 to 2013 resulted in cumulative C losses of 224 or 87 g/m2, respectively, without or with changes in those parameters. Thus, warming‐induced parameter changes reduced predicted soil C loss by 61%. Our study suggests that it is critical to incorporate biotic changes inESMs to improve the model performance in predicting C dynamics in permafrost regions.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14325&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 24 citations 24 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14325&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2020Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2020 United States, Chile, Switzerland, Ireland, Germany, ChilePublisher:Wiley Publicly fundedFunded by:NSF | Collaborative Research: T..., ARC | Discovery Projects - Gran..., University College Dublin +8 projectsNSF| Collaborative Research: The Role of Iron Redox Dynamics in Carbon Losses from Tropical Forest Soils ,ARC| Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP170102766 ,University College Dublin ,ARC| Woodland response to elevated CO2 in free air carbon dioxide enrichment: does phosphorus limit the sink for Carbon? ,SNSF| ICOS-CH Phase 2 ,NSF| Collaborative Research: ABI Development: The PEcAn Project: A Community Platform for Ecological Forecasting ,SNSF| Towards the rational design of molecular glue degraders ,SNSF| Functional diversity and cell-cell communication in biocontrol fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. associated with natural disease- suppressiveness of soils ,ARC| Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP160102452 ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Effects of Species on Forest Carbon Balances in Lowland Costa Rica ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Tree Species Effects on Ecosystem Processes in Lowland Costa RicaMirco Migliavacca; Christoph S. Vogel; Thomas Wutzler; Russell L. Scott; Mioko Ataka; Jason P. Kaye; Järvi Järveoja; Kadmiel Maseyk; Ben Bond-Lamberty; K. C. Mathes; Joseph Verfaillie; Catriona A. Macdonald; Kentaro Takagi; Jennifer Goedhart Nietz; Eric A. Davidson; Susan E. Trumbore; Melanie A. Mayes; Elise Pendall; Carolyn Monika Görres; Christine S. O’Connell; Christine S. O’Connell; Masahito Ueyama; Cecilio Oyonarte; Mats Nilsson; Christopher M. Gough; Jorge F. Perez-Quezada; Mariah S. Carbone; Ruth K. Varner; Omar Gutiérrez del Arroyo; Junliang Zou; Alexandre A. Renchon; Nina Buchmann; Shih-Chieh Chang; Anya M. Hopple; Anya M. Hopple; Munemasa Teramoto; Stephanie C. Pennington; Jin-Sheng He; Yuji Kominami; Jillian W. Gregg; Enrique P. Sánchez-Cañete; James W. Raich; Greg Winston; Juying Wu; Ulli Seibt; Marguerite Mauritz; Zhuo Pang; Hamidreza Norouzi; Peter S. Curtis; Ankur R. Desai; Rodrigo Vargas; Bruce Osborne; Jinsong Wang; Scott T. Miller; Avni Malhotra; Asko Noormets; Whendee L. Silver; Mark G. Tjoelker; Tana E. Wood; T. A. Black; Michael Gavazzi; Haiming Kan; Matthias Peichl; Tarek S. El-Madany; Nadine K. Ruehr; Steve McNulty; H. Hughes; Jiye Zeng; Daphne Szutu; Richard P. Phillips; Claire L. Phillips; Wu Sun; Rachhpal S. Jassal; Patrick M. Crill; Amir AghaKouchak; Quan Zhang; Matthew Saunders; D. S. Christianson; Masahiro Takagi; Kathleen Savage; Jinshi Jian; Chelcy Ford Miniat; John E. Drake; Guofang Miao; Samaneh Ashraf; Naishen Liang; Tianshan Zha; Michael L. Goulden; Marion Schrumpf; Takashi Hirano; Debjani Sihi; Juan J. Armesto; David A. Lipson; M. Altaf Arain; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Hassan Anjileli;doi: 10.1111/gcb.15353 , 10.60692/ejg8a-yd340 , 10.5445/ir/1000125998 , 10.3929/ethz-b-000446726 , 10.60692/wvgem-qyh85
pmid: 33026137
pmc: PMC7756728
handle: 10197/12610 , 1959.7/uws:57686
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15353 , 10.60692/ejg8a-yd340 , 10.5445/ir/1000125998 , 10.3929/ethz-b-000446726 , 10.60692/wvgem-qyh85
pmid: 33026137
pmc: PMC7756728
handle: 10197/12610 , 1959.7/uws:57686
AbstractGlobally, soils store two to three times as much carbon as currently resides in the atmosphere, and it is critical to understand how soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and uptake will respond to ongoing climate change. In particular, the soil‐to‐atmosphere CO2 flux, commonly though imprecisely termed soil respiration (RS), is one of the largest carbon fluxes in the Earth system. An increasing number of high‐frequency RS measurements (typically, from an automated system with hourly sampling) have been made over the last two decades; an increasing number of methane measurements are being made with such systems as well. Such high frequency data are an invaluable resource for understanding GHG fluxes, but lack a central database or repository. Here we describe the lightweight, open‐source COSORE (COntinuous SOil REspiration) database and software, that focuses on automated, continuous and long‐term GHG flux datasets, and is intended to serve as a community resource for earth sciences, climate change syntheses and model evaluation. Contributed datasets are mapped to a single, consistent standard, with metadata on contributors, geographic location, measurement conditions and ancillary data. The design emphasizes the importance of reproducibility, scientific transparency and open access to data. While being oriented towards continuously measured RS, the database design accommodates other soil‐atmosphere measurements (e.g. ecosystem respiration, chamber‐measured net ecosystem exchange, methane fluxes) as well as experimental treatments (heterotrophic only, etc.). We give brief examples of the types of analyses possible using this new community resource and describe its accompanying R software package.
CORE arrow_drop_down University College Dublin: Research Repository UCDArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12610Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universidad de Chile: Repositorio académicoArticle . 2020License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: Repositorio UCArticle . 2022Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.15353&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 52 citations 52 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
download 11download downloads 11 Powered bymore_vert CORE arrow_drop_down University College Dublin: Research Repository UCDArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12610Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universidad de Chile: Repositorio académicoArticle . 2020License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: Repositorio UCArticle . 2022Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.15353&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 United StatesPublisher:American Geophysical Union (AGU) Funded by:NSF | CAREER: Experimental Warm..., NSF | NNA: LTREB: The Arctic ..., NSF | The Bonanza Creek (BNZ) L... +1 projectsNSF| CAREER: Experimental Warming, Permafrost Thawing, and the Loss of Old Carbon from Tundra: Radiocarbon Research and Education to Understand Ecosystem Feedbacks to Climate Change ,NSF| NNA: LTREB: The Arctic Carbon and Climate (ACCLIMATE) Observatory: Tundra Ecosystem Carbon Balance and Old Carbon Loss as a Consequence of Permafrost Degradation ,NSF| The Bonanza Creek (BNZ) LTER: Regional Consequences of Changing Climate-Disturbance Interactions for the Resilience of Alaska's Boreal Forest ,NSF| Warming and drying effects on tundra carbon balanceE. Pegoraro; J. Ledman; J. Ledman; Heidi Rodenhizer; César Plaza; M. Taylor; M. Taylor; Emily Romano; Marguerite Mauritz; Marguerite Mauritz; Susan M. Natali; Edward A. G. Schuur; Christina Schädel;doi: 10.1029/2019jg005528
AbstractPermafrost thaw is typically measured with active layer thickness, or the maximum seasonal thaw measured from the ground surface. However, previous work has shown that this measurement alone fails to account for ground subsidence and therefore underestimates permafrost thaw. To determine the impact of subsidence on observed permafrost thaw and thawed soil carbon stocks, we quantified subsidence using high‐accuracy GPS and identified its environmental drivers in a permafrost warming experiment near the southern limit of permafrost in Alaska. With permafrost temperatures near 0°C, 10.8 cm of subsidence was observed in control plots over 9 years. Experimental air and soil warming increased subsidence by five times and created inundated microsites. Across treatments, ice and soil loss drove 85–91% and 9–15% of subsidence, respectively. Accounting for subsidence, permafrost thawed between 19% (control) and 49% (warming) deeper than active layer thickness indicated, and the amount of newly thawed carbon within the active layer was between 37% (control) and 113% (warming) greater. As additional carbon thaws as the active layer deepens, carbon fluxes to the atmosphere and lateral transport of carbon in groundwater could increase. The magnitude of this impact is uncertain at the landscape scale, though, due to limited subsidence measurements. Therefore, to determine the full extent of permafrost thaw across the circumpolar region and its feedback on the carbon cycle, it is necessary to quantify subsidence more broadly across the circumpolar region.
Journal of Geophysic... arrow_drop_down Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesArticleLicense: publisher-specific, author manuscriptData sources: UnpayWallJournal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1029/2019jg005528&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 26 citations 26 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Journal of Geophysic... arrow_drop_down Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesArticleLicense: publisher-specific, author manuscriptData sources: UnpayWallJournal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1029/2019jg005528&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 Finland, Germany, Denmark, France, Sweden, China (People's Republic of), China (People's Republic of), China (People's Republic of), Germany, FinlandPublisher:Wiley Funded by:NSERC, AKA | When ancient meets modern..., NSF | Collaborative Research: U... +18 projectsNSERC ,AKA| When ancient meets modern effect of plant-derived carbon on anaerobic decomposition in arctic permafrost soils (PANDA) ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Using the ITEX-AON network to document and understand terrestrial ecosystem change in the Arctic ,RCN| Winter-proofing land surface models - quantifying the critical role of cold season processes in vegetation-permafrost feedbacks ,NSF| METHANE AT THE ZERO CURTAIN ,AKA| Geomorphic sensitivity of the Arctic region: geohazards and infrastructure (INFRAHAZARD) / Consortium: INFRAHAZARD ,EC| INTAROS ,NSF| IPY: Collaborative Research on Carbon, Water, and Energy Balance of the Arctic Landscape at Flagship Observatories and in a Pan-Arctic Network ,AKA| Methane uptake by permafrost-affected soils – an underestimated carbon sink in Arctic ecosystems? (MUFFIN) ,AKA| Biogeochemical and biophysical feedbacks from forest harvesting to climate change / Consortium: NNNN ,AKA| Novel soil management practices - key for sustainable bioeconomy and climate change mitigation -SOMPA / Consortium: SOMPA ,AKA| Towards constraining the circumarctic nitrous oxide budget (NOCA) ,NSF| Methane loss from Arctic: towards an annual budget of CH4 emissions from tundra ecosystems across a latitudinal gradient ,AKA| Atmosphere and Climate Competence Center (ACCC) ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Research, Synthesis, and Knowledge Transfer in a Changing Arctic: Science Support for the Study of Environmental Arctic Change (SEARCH) ,EC| PAGE21 ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Multi-Regional Scale Aircraft Observations of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Isotopic Fluxes in the Arctic ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Permafrost Carbon Network: Synthesizing flux observations for benchmarking model projections of permafrost carbon exchange ,NSF| Collaborative Research on Carbon, Water, and Energy Balance of the Arctic Landscape at Flagship Observatories in Alaska and Siberia ,NSF| AON: Development of Sustainable Observations of Thermal State of Permafrost in North America and Russia: The U.S. Contribution to the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost ,AKA| Atmosphere and Climate Competence Center (ACCC)Edward A. G. Schuur; Järvi Järveoja; S. Potter; Stef Bokhorst; Marguerite Mauritz; Mats Nilsson; Steven F. Oberbauer; Elyn Humphreys; M. Goeckede; Pertti J. Martikainen; John Kochendorfer; Jinshu Chi; Juha Aalto; Juha Aalto; Jennifer D. Watts; Torben R. Christensen; Matthias Peichl; Oliver Sonnentag; Vincent L. St. Louis; Craig A. Emmerton; Miska Luoto; David Holl; Eugénie S. Euskirchen; Torbern Tagesson; Torbern Tagesson; Sang Jong Park; Gerardo Celis; Margaret S. Torn; Frans-Jan W. Parmentier; Frans-Jan W. Parmentier; Maija E. Marushchak; Maija E. Marushchak; Namyi Chae; Walter C. Oechel; Walter C. Oechel; Masahito Ueyama; Peter M. Lafleur; Christina Biasi; Bo Elberling; Brendan M. Rogers; Han Dolman; Ivan Mammarella; Aleksi Lehtonen; Claire C. Treat; Min Jung Kwon; Carolina Voigt; Carolina Voigt; Hideki Kobayashi; Rafael Poyatos; Susan M. Natali; Hiroki Iwata; Donatella Zona; Donatella Zona; Anna-Maria Virkkala; Efrén López-Blanco; Torsten Sachs;doi: 10.1111/gcb.15659
pmid: 33913236
AbstractThe regional variability in tundra and boreal carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes can be high, complicating efforts to quantify sink‐source patterns across the entire region. Statistical models are increasingly used to predict (i.e., upscale) CO2 fluxes across large spatial domains, but the reliability of different modeling techniques, each with different specifications and assumptions, has not been assessed in detail. Here, we compile eddy covariance and chamber measurements of annual and growing season CO2 fluxes of gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during 1990–2015 from 148 terrestrial high‐latitude (i.e., tundra and boreal) sites to analyze the spatial patterns and drivers of CO2 fluxes and test the accuracy and uncertainty of different statistical models. CO2 fluxes were upscaled at relatively high spatial resolution (1 km2) across the high‐latitude region using five commonly used statistical models and their ensemble, that is, the median of all five models, using climatic, vegetation, and soil predictors. We found the performance of machine learning and ensemble predictions to outperform traditional regression methods. We also found the predictive performance of NEE‐focused models to be low, relative to models predicting GPP and ER. Our data compilation and ensemble predictions showed that CO2 sink strength was larger in the boreal biome (observed and predicted average annual NEE −46 and −29 g C m−2 yr−1, respectively) compared to tundra (average annual NEE +10 and −2 g C m−2 yr−1). This pattern was associated with large spatial variability, reflecting local heterogeneity in soil organic carbon stocks, climate, and vegetation productivity. The terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget, estimated using the annual NEE ensemble prediction, suggests the high‐latitude region was on average an annual CO2 sink during 1990–2015, although uncertainty remains high.
Institut national de... arrow_drop_down Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2021Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03260396Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)Article . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2021Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03260396Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Electronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information CenterUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.15659&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 105 citations 105 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Institut national de... arrow_drop_down Institut national des sciences de l'Univers: HAL-INSUArticle . 2021Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03260396Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)GFZpublic (German Research Centre for Geosciences, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam)Article . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines: HAL-UVSQArticle . 2021Full-Text: https://hal.science/hal-03260396Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Electronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information CenterUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Resources Institute Finland: JukuriArticleData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.15659&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 United StatesPublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | VULCANEC| VULCANE. Pegoraro; V. G. Salmon; Junyi Liang; Junyi Liang; César Plaza; César Plaza; César Plaza; Gerardo Celis; Jizhong Zhou; Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis; Christopher Ryan Penton; Edward A. G. Schuur; Yiqi Luo; Yiqi Luo; Yiqi Luo; Susan M. Natali; James M. Tiedje; Marguerite Mauritz; James R. Cole; Lifen Jiang; Lifen Jiang; Shuang Ma; Shuang Ma; Jiangyang Xia; Zheng Shi; Xingjie Lu; Xingjie Lu;doi: 10.1111/gcb.14325
pmid: 29802797
AbstractClimate warming can result in both abiotic (e.g., permafrost thaw) and biotic (e.g., microbial functional genes) changes in Arctic tundra. Recent research has incorporated dynamic permafrost thaw in Earth system models (ESMs) and indicates that Arctic tundra could be a significant future carbon (C) source due to the enhanced decomposition of thawed deep soil C. However, warming‐induced biotic changes may influence biologically related parameters and the consequent projections inESMs. How model parameters associated with biotic responses will change under warming and to what extent these changes affect projected C budgets have not been carefully examined. In this study, we synthesized six data sets over 5 years from a soil warming experiment at the Eight Mile Lake, Alaska, into the TerrestrialECOsystem (TECO) model with a probabilistic inversion approach. TheTECOmodel used multiple soil layers to track dynamics of thawed soil under different treatments. Our results show that warming increased light use efficiency of vegetation photosynthesis but decreased baseline (i.e., environment‐corrected) turnover rates ofSOCin both the fast and slow pools in comparison with those under control. Moreover, the parameter changes generally amplified over time, suggesting processes of gradual physiological acclimation and functional gene shifts of both plants and microbes. TheTECOmodel predicted that field warming from 2009 to 2013 resulted in cumulative C losses of 224 or 87 g/m2, respectively, without or with changes in those parameters. Thus, warming‐induced parameter changes reduced predicted soil C loss by 61%. Our study suggests that it is critical to incorporate biotic changes inESMs to improve the model performance in predicting C dynamics in permafrost regions.
Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14325&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 24 citations 24 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Global Change Biolog... arrow_drop_down Global Change BiologyArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.14325&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2020Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2020 United States, Chile, Switzerland, Ireland, Germany, ChilePublisher:Wiley Publicly fundedFunded by:NSF | Collaborative Research: T..., ARC | Discovery Projects - Gran..., University College Dublin +8 projectsNSF| Collaborative Research: The Role of Iron Redox Dynamics in Carbon Losses from Tropical Forest Soils ,ARC| Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP170102766 ,University College Dublin ,ARC| Woodland response to elevated CO2 in free air carbon dioxide enrichment: does phosphorus limit the sink for Carbon? ,SNSF| ICOS-CH Phase 2 ,NSF| Collaborative Research: ABI Development: The PEcAn Project: A Community Platform for Ecological Forecasting ,SNSF| Towards the rational design of molecular glue degraders ,SNSF| Functional diversity and cell-cell communication in biocontrol fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. associated with natural disease- suppressiveness of soils ,ARC| Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP160102452 ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Effects of Species on Forest Carbon Balances in Lowland Costa Rica ,NSF| Collaborative Research: Tree Species Effects on Ecosystem Processes in Lowland Costa RicaMirco Migliavacca; Christoph S. Vogel; Thomas Wutzler; Russell L. Scott; Mioko Ataka; Jason P. Kaye; Järvi Järveoja; Kadmiel Maseyk; Ben Bond-Lamberty; K. C. Mathes; Joseph Verfaillie; Catriona A. Macdonald; Kentaro Takagi; Jennifer Goedhart Nietz; Eric A. Davidson; Susan E. Trumbore; Melanie A. Mayes; Elise Pendall; Carolyn Monika Görres; Christine S. O’Connell; Christine S. O’Connell; Masahito Ueyama; Cecilio Oyonarte; Mats Nilsson; Christopher M. Gough; Jorge F. Perez-Quezada; Mariah S. Carbone; Ruth K. Varner; Omar Gutiérrez del Arroyo; Junliang Zou; Alexandre A. Renchon; Nina Buchmann; Shih-Chieh Chang; Anya M. Hopple; Anya M. Hopple; Munemasa Teramoto; Stephanie C. Pennington; Jin-Sheng He; Yuji Kominami; Jillian W. Gregg; Enrique P. Sánchez-Cañete; James W. Raich; Greg Winston; Juying Wu; Ulli Seibt; Marguerite Mauritz; Zhuo Pang; Hamidreza Norouzi; Peter S. Curtis; Ankur R. Desai; Rodrigo Vargas; Bruce Osborne; Jinsong Wang; Scott T. Miller; Avni Malhotra; Asko Noormets; Whendee L. Silver; Mark G. Tjoelker; Tana E. Wood; T. A. Black; Michael Gavazzi; Haiming Kan; Matthias Peichl; Tarek S. El-Madany; Nadine K. Ruehr; Steve McNulty; H. Hughes; Jiye Zeng; Daphne Szutu; Richard P. Phillips; Claire L. Phillips; Wu Sun; Rachhpal S. Jassal; Patrick M. Crill; Amir AghaKouchak; Quan Zhang; Matthew Saunders; D. S. Christianson; Masahiro Takagi; Kathleen Savage; Jinshi Jian; Chelcy Ford Miniat; John E. Drake; Guofang Miao; Samaneh Ashraf; Naishen Liang; Tianshan Zha; Michael L. Goulden; Marion Schrumpf; Takashi Hirano; Debjani Sihi; Juan J. Armesto; David A. Lipson; M. Altaf Arain; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Hassan Anjileli;doi: 10.1111/gcb.15353 , 10.60692/ejg8a-yd340 , 10.5445/ir/1000125998 , 10.3929/ethz-b-000446726 , 10.60692/wvgem-qyh85
pmid: 33026137
pmc: PMC7756728
handle: 10197/12610 , 1959.7/uws:57686
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15353 , 10.60692/ejg8a-yd340 , 10.5445/ir/1000125998 , 10.3929/ethz-b-000446726 , 10.60692/wvgem-qyh85
pmid: 33026137
pmc: PMC7756728
handle: 10197/12610 , 1959.7/uws:57686
AbstractGlobally, soils store two to three times as much carbon as currently resides in the atmosphere, and it is critical to understand how soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and uptake will respond to ongoing climate change. In particular, the soil‐to‐atmosphere CO2 flux, commonly though imprecisely termed soil respiration (RS), is one of the largest carbon fluxes in the Earth system. An increasing number of high‐frequency RS measurements (typically, from an automated system with hourly sampling) have been made over the last two decades; an increasing number of methane measurements are being made with such systems as well. Such high frequency data are an invaluable resource for understanding GHG fluxes, but lack a central database or repository. Here we describe the lightweight, open‐source COSORE (COntinuous SOil REspiration) database and software, that focuses on automated, continuous and long‐term GHG flux datasets, and is intended to serve as a community resource for earth sciences, climate change syntheses and model evaluation. Contributed datasets are mapped to a single, consistent standard, with metadata on contributors, geographic location, measurement conditions and ancillary data. The design emphasizes the importance of reproducibility, scientific transparency and open access to data. While being oriented towards continuously measured RS, the database design accommodates other soil‐atmosphere measurements (e.g. ecosystem respiration, chamber‐measured net ecosystem exchange, methane fluxes) as well as experimental treatments (heterotrophic only, etc.). We give brief examples of the types of analyses possible using this new community resource and describe its accompanying R software package.
CORE arrow_drop_down University College Dublin: Research Repository UCDArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12610Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universidad de Chile: Repositorio académicoArticle . 2020License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: Repositorio UCArticle . 2022Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.15353&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 52 citations 52 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
download 11download downloads 11 Powered bymore_vert CORE arrow_drop_down University College Dublin: Research Repository UCDArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12610Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Western Sydney (UWS): Research DirectArticle . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie)Article . 2020License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Universidad de Chile: Repositorio académicoArticle . 2020License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: Repositorio UCArticle . 2022Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcb.15353&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 United StatesPublisher:American Geophysical Union (AGU) Funded by:NSF | CAREER: Experimental Warm..., NSF | NNA: LTREB: The Arctic ..., NSF | The Bonanza Creek (BNZ) L... +1 projectsNSF| CAREER: Experimental Warming, Permafrost Thawing, and the Loss of Old Carbon from Tundra: Radiocarbon Research and Education to Understand Ecosystem Feedbacks to Climate Change ,NSF| NNA: LTREB: The Arctic Carbon and Climate (ACCLIMATE) Observatory: Tundra Ecosystem Carbon Balance and Old Carbon Loss as a Consequence of Permafrost Degradation ,NSF| The Bonanza Creek (BNZ) LTER: Regional Consequences of Changing Climate-Disturbance Interactions for the Resilience of Alaska's Boreal Forest ,NSF| Warming and drying effects on tundra carbon balanceE. Pegoraro; J. Ledman; J. Ledman; Heidi Rodenhizer; César Plaza; M. Taylor; M. Taylor; Emily Romano; Marguerite Mauritz; Marguerite Mauritz; Susan M. Natali; Edward A. G. Schuur; Christina Schädel;doi: 10.1029/2019jg005528
AbstractPermafrost thaw is typically measured with active layer thickness, or the maximum seasonal thaw measured from the ground surface. However, previous work has shown that this measurement alone fails to account for ground subsidence and therefore underestimates permafrost thaw. To determine the impact of subsidence on observed permafrost thaw and thawed soil carbon stocks, we quantified subsidence using high‐accuracy GPS and identified its environmental drivers in a permafrost warming experiment near the southern limit of permafrost in Alaska. With permafrost temperatures near 0°C, 10.8 cm of subsidence was observed in control plots over 9 years. Experimental air and soil warming increased subsidence by five times and created inundated microsites. Across treatments, ice and soil loss drove 85–91% and 9–15% of subsidence, respectively. Accounting for subsidence, permafrost thawed between 19% (control) and 49% (warming) deeper than active layer thickness indicated, and the amount of newly thawed carbon within the active layer was between 37% (control) and 113% (warming) greater. As additional carbon thaws as the active layer deepens, carbon fluxes to the atmosphere and lateral transport of carbon in groundwater could increase. The magnitude of this impact is uncertain at the landscape scale, though, due to limited subsidence measurements. Therefore, to determine the full extent of permafrost thaw across the circumpolar region and its feedback on the carbon cycle, it is necessary to quantify subsidence more broadly across the circumpolar region.
Journal of Geophysic... arrow_drop_down Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesArticleLicense: publisher-specific, author manuscriptData sources: UnpayWallJournal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1029/2019jg005528&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 26 citations 26 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Journal of Geophysic... arrow_drop_down Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesArticleLicense: publisher-specific, author manuscriptData sources: UnpayWallJournal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1029/2019jg005528&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu