• Energy Research
• 13. Climate action close
• 12. Responsible consumption close

Abstract The elevated energy demands from past decades has created the energy gaps which can mainly be fulfilled through the consumption of natural fossil fuels but at the expense of increased greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the need of clean and sustainable options to meet energy gaps have increased significantly. Gasification and steam methane reforming are the efficient technologies which resourcefully produce the syngas and hydrogen from coal and natural gas, respectively. The syngas and hydrogen can be further utilized to generate power or other Fischer Tropsch chemicals. In this study, two process models are developed and technically compared to analyze the production capacity of syngas and hydrogen. First model is developed based on conventional entrained flow gasification process which is validated with data provided by DOE followed by its integration with the reforming process that leads to the second model. The integrated gasification and reforming process model is developed to maximize the hydrogen production while reducing the overall carbon dioxide emissions. Furthermore, the integrated model eradicates the possibility of reformer’s catalyst deactivation due to significant amount of H2S present in the coal derived syngas. It has been seen from results that updated model offers 37% increase in H2/CO ratio, 10% increase in cold gas efficiency (CGE), 25% increase in overall H2 production, and 13% reduction in CO2 emission per unit amount of hydrogen production compared to base case model. Furthermore, economic analysis indicated 8% reduction in cost for case 2 while presenting 7% enhanced hydrogen contents.

Abstract The elevated energy demands from past decades has created the energy gaps which can mainly be fulfilled through the consumption of natural fossil fuels but at the expense of increased greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the need of clean and sustainable options to meet energy gaps have increased significantly. Gasification and steam methane reforming are the efficient technologies which resourcefully produce the syngas and hydrogen from coal and natural gas, respectively. The syngas and hydrogen can be further utilized to generate power or other Fischer Tropsch chemicals. In this study, two process models are developed and technically compared to analyze the production capacity of syngas and hydrogen. First model is developed based on conventional entrained flow gasification process which is validated with data provided by DOE followed by its integration with the reforming process that leads to the second model. The integrated gasification and reforming process model is developed to maximize the hydrogen production while reducing the overall carbon dioxide emissions. Furthermore, the integrated model eradicates the possibility of reformer’s catalyst deactivation due to significant amount of H2S present in the coal derived syngas. It has been seen from results that updated model offers 37% increase in H2/CO ratio, 10% increase in cold gas efficiency (CGE), 25% increase in overall H2 production, and 13% reduction in CO2 emission per unit amount of hydrogen production compared to base case model. Furthermore, economic analysis indicated 8% reduction in cost for case 2 while presenting 7% enhanced hydrogen contents.

Abstract Since decades, one of the major troublesome environmental issue to the society is Polystyrene waste. Thermal conversion method can be used to transform the plastic waste into useful energy source. In this study, liquefaction technique using ethanol as a solvent was used to produce liquid fuel from polystyrene. The experiments were performed at different temperatures (290–370 °C), ethanol to polystyrene ratios (0.25:1–4:1) and reaction times (15–75 min) in an autoclave batch reactor. After characterization, quantitative and qualitative evaluation of liquid products; results showed that at temperature of 350 °C, ethanol to polystyrene ratio of 0.5:1 and reaction time of 60 min, highest liquid yield of 84.7 wt% was achieved. The viscosity, density, pH, calorific value and flash point of the oil product at this condition was 0.36 cP, 0.88 g/mL, 6.86, 40.91 MJ/kg and 55 °C respectively. Through GC–MS analysis, it was found that the oil product was mostly composed of aromatics, alkenes and alkyls; which made the liquid oil suitable to be used as fuel. In addition, comparative study was conducted by replacing ethanol with water as solvent under same conditions. Based on results, study proved ethanol to be better solvent than water which is commonly used in liquefaction process. Lastly, the liquid fuel produced is suitable to be used as alternative energy source for conventional fossil fuels.

Abstract Since decades, one of the major troublesome environmental issue to the society is Polystyrene waste. Thermal conversion method can be used to transform the plastic waste into useful energy source. In this study, liquefaction technique using ethanol as a solvent was used to produce liquid fuel from polystyrene. The experiments were performed at different temperatures (290–370 °C), ethanol to polystyrene ratios (0.25:1–4:1) and reaction times (15–75 min) in an autoclave batch reactor. After characterization, quantitative and qualitative evaluation of liquid products; results showed that at temperature of 350 °C, ethanol to polystyrene ratio of 0.5:1 and reaction time of 60 min, highest liquid yield of 84.7 wt% was achieved. The viscosity, density, pH, calorific value and flash point of the oil product at this condition was 0.36 cP, 0.88 g/mL, 6.86, 40.91 MJ/kg and 55 °C respectively. Through GC–MS analysis, it was found that the oil product was mostly composed of aromatics, alkenes and alkyls; which made the liquid oil suitable to be used as fuel. In addition, comparative study was conducted by replacing ethanol with water as solvent under same conditions. Based on results, study proved ethanol to be better solvent than water which is commonly used in liquefaction process. Lastly, the liquid fuel produced is suitable to be used as alternative energy source for conventional fossil fuels.

Abstract An increase in energy demand in the recent decades have created energy shortages that can be fulfilled by the use of fossil fuels. Gasification and reforming techniques are effective methods for producing syngas and hydrogen from natural gas and coal. The two process models have been developed in this study, in which syngas and hydrogen is produced from coal and natural gas. The case 1 relies on the entrained flow gasification unit which is validated by literature data, and then integrated with the reforming process reforming to generate the case 2. The integrated gasifier and reforming model was created to increase H2 output while lowering the total carbon footprints. In case of 2nd model, the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio (HCR) is 1.20 which is almost 88% higher than the baseline. Due to the higher HCR in case 2, the overall production of H2 is 55% higher than the case 2. Moreover, the efficiency of case 2 is 18.5% higher which reduces the carbon emissions by 69.6% per unit of hydrogen production compared to case 1.Furthermore, the investment per ton of hydrogen production and hydrogen selling prices in Case 2 is 28.9% lower compared to the case 1 design.

Abstract An increase in energy demand in the recent decades have created energy shortages that can be fulfilled by the use of fossil fuels. Gasification and reforming techniques are effective methods for producing syngas and hydrogen from natural gas and coal. The two process models have been developed in this study, in which syngas and hydrogen is produced from coal and natural gas. The case 1 relies on the entrained flow gasification unit which is validated by literature data, and then integrated with the reforming process reforming to generate the case 2. The integrated gasifier and reforming model was created to increase H2 output while lowering the total carbon footprints. In case of 2nd model, the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio (HCR) is 1.20 which is almost 88% higher than the baseline. Due to the higher HCR in case 2, the overall production of H2 is 55% higher than the case 2. Moreover, the efficiency of case 2 is 18.5% higher which reduces the carbon emissions by 69.6% per unit of hydrogen production compared to case 1.Furthermore, the investment per ton of hydrogen production and hydrogen selling prices in Case 2 is 28.9% lower compared to the case 1 design.

AbstractPyrolysis of waste polystyrene to generate fuel was carried out to yield pyrolysis oil. For the first time, NiO deposited over ZrO2 carrier as catalyst, was deployed and evaluated in the catalytic pyrolysis. Catalysts based on different loading (2, 5, 10, and 15%) of NiO deposited over ZrO2 carrier were prepared by solution combustion synthesis and tested toward screening of catalytic pyrolysis of PS in semi batch reactor. Based on conversion, yield of oil and low styrene monomer content, the catalytic performance with different loadings was evaluated and optimized. Furthermore, the oil obtained from the best catalysts were analyzed using GC–MS for carbon number distribution, depolymerization reactions, and diesel fuel generation. These catalysts were also characterized using X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), pyridine FTIR, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. As compared to thermal pyrolysis, the catalytic pyrolysis process was found to be highly selective toward diesel like fuel generation with minimum styrene monomer formation. Also, 2 and 10% NiO catalyst showed the best catalytic performance in pyrolysis process that could be ascribed to the presence of Lewis and Brönsted acid sites resulting in selectivity for C16 carbon number, diesel fuel generation, and depolymerization reactions.

AbstractPyrolysis of waste polystyrene to generate fuel was carried out to yield pyrolysis oil. For the first time, NiO deposited over ZrO2 carrier as catalyst, was deployed and evaluated in the catalytic pyrolysis. Catalysts based on different loading (2, 5, 10, and 15%) of NiO deposited over ZrO2 carrier were prepared by solution combustion synthesis and tested toward screening of catalytic pyrolysis of PS in semi batch reactor. Based on conversion, yield of oil and low styrene monomer content, the catalytic performance with different loadings was evaluated and optimized. Furthermore, the oil obtained from the best catalysts were analyzed using GC–MS for carbon number distribution, depolymerization reactions, and diesel fuel generation. These catalysts were also characterized using X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), pyridine FTIR, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. As compared to thermal pyrolysis, the catalytic pyrolysis process was found to be highly selective toward diesel like fuel generation with minimum styrene monomer formation. Also, 2 and 10% NiO catalyst showed the best catalytic performance in pyrolysis process that could be ascribed to the presence of Lewis and Brönsted acid sites resulting in selectivity for C16 carbon number, diesel fuel generation, and depolymerization reactions.

With the increase in global energy requirements, the utilization of fossil fuels has also increased, which has caused global warming. In this study, a process integration framework based on an energy mix system is proposed to simultaneously produce two cleaner fuels (methanol and H2). Aspen Plus is used to develop process models followed by their techno-economic assessment. Case 1 is considered the base case process, where the coal–biomass gasification process is used to produce the synthesis gas, which is further converted into H2 and methanol. Conversely, the case 2 design represents the novel process configuration framework, where the coal–biomass gasification technology in case 1 is sequentially integrated with the methane reforming technology to minimize the energy penalties while increasing the net fuel production. To perform the technical analysis, the fuel production rates, carbon conversion efficiencies and specific energy requirements are compared for both models. It is analyzed from the results that the case 2 design offers higher methanol and H2 production rates with lower energy requirements. Additionally, the specific energy requirement for case 2 is 29% lower compared to the case 1 design, leading to an increase in the process efficiency of case 2 by 3.5%.