• Energy Research

Based on current evidence and established critical thresholds for soil degradation indicators, it is concerning that over 60-70% of European soils are unhealthy due to unsustainable management and the impact of climate change. Despite European and national efforts to improve soil health, significant gaps remain. The proposal for a Soil Monitoring and Resilience Law, to be implemented by the European Union, seeks to establish a framework for soil monitoring and promote sustainable management practices to achieve healthy soils by 2050. This requires extensive data collection and soil monitoring systems to accurately estimate soil health across Europe, considering the diversity of soil types, climates, and land uses. To establish a framework for soil monitoring, we must understand the site-specific status of soil and the ranges of soil health indicators across specific pedoclimatic regions. In our study, we evaluated the soil status in agricultural areas in Denmark using soil health indicators and a site-specific benchmarking approach. We compiled nationally representative datasets, combining point and model-informed data of soil parameters such as organic carbon content, bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, clay-to-soil organiccarbon ratio, water erosion, and nitrogen leaching. By categorizing Danish agricultural soils into monitoring units based on textural classes, landscape elements, and wetland types, we calculated benchmarks for these indicators, considering different cropping systems. Our approach provided detailed point-based results and a spatially explicit overview of the status of soil health indicators in Denmark. We identified areas where soil deviates from the benchmarks of different indicators. Such deviations might indicate soil functions operating outside the normal range, posing potential threats to soil health. This proposed framework could support the establishment of a baseline for assessing the directionality of future changes in soil health. Moreover, it is adaptable for implementation by other countries to support assessments of soil health.

AbstractPeatlands cover only 3–4% of the Earth’s surface, but they store nearly 30% of global soil carbon stock. This significant carbon store is under threat as peatlands continue to be degraded at alarming rates around the world. It has prompted countries worldwide to establish regulations to conserve and reduce emissions from this carbon rich ecosystem. For example, the EU has implemented new rules that mandate sustainable management of peatlands, critical to reaching the goal of carbon neutrality by 2050. However, a lack of information on the extent and condition of peatlands has hindered the development of national policies and restoration efforts. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge on mapping and monitoring peatlands from field sites to the globe and identifies areas where further research is needed. It presents an overview of the different methodologies used to map peatlands in nine countries, which vary in definition of peat soil and peatland, mapping coverage, and mapping detail. Whereas mapping peatlands across the world with only one approach is hardly possible, the paper highlights the need for more consistent approaches within regions having comparable peatland types and climates to inform their protection and urgent restoration. The review further summarises various approaches used for monitoring peatland conditions and functions. These include monitoring at the plot scale for degree of humification and stoichiometric ratio, and proximal sensing such as gamma radiometrics and electromagnetic induction at the field to landscape scale for mapping peat thickness and identifying hotspots for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Remote sensing techniques with passive and active sensors at regional to national scale can help in monitoring subsidence rate, water table, peat moisture, landslides, and GHG emissions. Although the use of water table depth as a proxy for interannual GHG emissions from peatlands has been well established, there is no single remote sensing method or data product yet that has been verified beyond local or regional scales. Broader land-use change and fire monitoring at a global scale may further assist national GHG inventory reporting. Monitoring of peatland conditions to evaluate the success of individual restoration schemes still requires field work to assess local proxies combined with remote sensing and modeling. Long-term monitoring is necessary to draw valid conclusions on revegetation outcomes and associated GHG emissions in rewetted peatlands, as their dynamics are not fully understood at the site level. Monitoring vegetation development and hydrology of restored peatlands is needed as a proxy to assess the return of water and changes in nutrient cycling and biodiversity.

Draining peatlands for agriculture transforms them into significant carbon (C) sources. Restoring drained peatlands is increasingly recognized as a climate action strategy to reduce terrestrial greenhouse gas emissions. Restoration efforts often require accurate inputs, like peat thickness (PT), for C-stock estimation and monitoring; however, these are often lacking or available at suboptimal accuracy levels. In this study, apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) from proximal electromagnetic induction (EMI) surveys and topographic variables derived from a LiDAR-based digital elevation model were assessed as covariates for PT mapping of an agricultural bog, separately and combined, using the quantile random forest algorithm. Local models were trained separately for the large (308 ha) and small (42 ha) EMI surveyed areas, while global models combined data from both areas for a full site analysis. The subsurface was characterized based on resistivity variations in inverted towed transient electromagnetic (tTEM) data. The results indicated that combining topographic and ECa covariates yielded the best PT prediction accuracy for the global model, with a coefficient of determination of 0.61 and a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.10. The best large area local model was less accurate than the former (NRMSE of 0.18), while the best small area local model (NRMSE of 0.11) was superior to the best global model. Models trained with only topographic or ECa covariates were the least accurate, especially for the ECa-only model. The tTEM results revealed a heterogenous site characterized by a thin, resistive peat layer overlying stratified postglacial deposits of clay, sand, and saline chalk. Our findings show that covariates characterizing surface and subsurface properties are essential for accurate PT mapping and can inform tailored land use planning and restoration initiatives for degraded peatlands.

Pristine peatlands being excellent storage for terrestrial Carbon (C) play a crucial role in regulating climate and water and provide several important ecosystem services. However, peatlands have been heavily altered (e.g., by draining the water table), increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Restoring peatlands requires a comprehensive characterization, including knowledge of peat depth (PD; m). Traditionally, this requires the physical insertion of a push probe, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. It has been shown that non-invasive proximal sensing techniques such as electromagnetic induction and ground penetrating radar can add value to PD data. In this research, we want to assess the potential of proximally sensed gamma-ray (γ-ray) spectrometry (i.e., potassium [K], thorium [Th], uranium [U], and the count rate [CR]) and terrain attributes data (i.e., elevation, slope, SAGAWI, and MRVBF) to map PD either alone or in combination across a small (10 ha) peatland area in ØBakker, Denmark. Here, the PD varies from 0.1 m in the south to 7.3 m in the north. We use various prediction models including ordinary kriging (OK) of PD, linear regression (LR), multiple LR (MLR), LR kriging (LRK), MLR kriging (MLRK) and empirical Bayesian kriging regression (EBKR). We also determine the minimum calibration sample size required by decreasing sample size in decrements (i.e., n = 100, 90, 80,…, 30). We compare these approaches using prediction agreement (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient; LCCC) and accuracy (root mean square error; RMSE). The results show that OK using maximum calibration size (n = 108) had near perfect agreement (0.97) and accuracy (0.59 m), compared to LR (ln CR; 0.65 and 0.78 m, respectively) and MLR (ln K, Th, CR and elevation; 0.85 and 0.63 m). Improvements are achieved by adding residuals; LRK (0.95 and 0.71 m) and MLRK (0.96 and 0.51 m). The best results were obtained using EBKR (0.97 and 0.63 m) given all predictions were positive and no significant change in agreement and standard errors with the decrement of calibration sample size (e.g., n = 30). The results have implications towards C stocks assessment and improved land use planning to control GHG emissions and slow down global warming.