• Energy Research

Summary Afforestation projects using species mixtures are expected to better support ecosystem services than monoculture plantations. While grassland studies have shown natural selection favoring high‐performance genotypes in species‐rich communities, this has not been explored in forests. We used seed‐family identity (known maternity) to represent genetic identity and investigated how this affected the biomass accumulation (i.e. growth) of individual trees (n = 13 435) along a species richness gradient (1–16 species) and over stand age (9 yr) in a forest biodiversity experiment. We found that among the eight species tested, different seed families responded differently to species richness, some of them growing relatively better in low‐diversity plots and others in high‐diversity plots. Furthermore, within‐species growth variation increased with species richness and stand age, while between‐species variation decreased with stand age. These results indicate that seed families within species and their reaction norms along the species richness gradient vary considerably and thus can explain a substantial proportion of the overall variation in tree growth. Our findings suggest that the growth and associated ecosystem services of species‐rich mixtures in afforestation projects can be optimized by artificially selecting seed families with high mixture performance in biodiversity experiments.

Summary Multispecies planting is an important approach to deliver ecosystem functions in afforestation projects. However, the importance of species richness vs specific species composition in this context remains unresolved. To estimate species or functional group richness and compositional change between two communities, we calculated nestedness, where one community contains a subset of the species of another, and turnover, where two communities differ in species composition but not in species richness. We evaluated the effects of species/functional group nestedness and turnover on stand productivity using 315 mixed plots from a pool of 40 tree species in a large forest biodiversity experiment in subtropical China. We found that the greater the differences in species or functional group nestedness and turnover, the greater the differences in stand productivity between plots. Additionally, the strong effects of both nestedness and turnover on stand productivity developed over the 11‐yr observation period. Our results indicate that selection of specific tree species is as important as planting a large number of species to support the productivity function of forests. Furthermore, the selection of specific tree species should be based on functionality, because beneficial effects of functional group composition were stronger than those of species composition.