- home
- Advanced Search
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Review , Journal 2021 Norway, Australia, Denmark, Norway, Austria, United States, Germany, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:IOP Publishing Funded by:EC | MAT_STOCKSEC| MAT_STOCKSWilliam F. Lamb; Thomas Wiedmann; Julia Pongratz; Robbie M. Andrew; Monica Crippa; J. G. J. Olivier; Dominik Wiedenhofer; Giulio Mattioli; Alaa Al Khourdajie; Joanna I. House; Shonali Pachauri; María Figueroa; Yamina Saheb; Raphael Slade; Klaus Hubacek; Laixiang Sun; Suzana Kahn Ribeiro; Smail Khennas; Stéphane de la Rue du Can; Lazarus Chapungu; Steven J. Davis; I. A. Bashmakov; Hancheng Dai; Shobhakar Dhakal; Xianjun Tan; Yong Geng; Baihe Gu; Jan C. Minx;AbstractGlobal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be traced to five economic sectors: energy, industry, buildings, transport and AFOLU (agriculture, forestry and other land uses). In this topical review, we synthesise the literature to explain recent trends in global and regional emissions in each of these sectors. To contextualise our review, we present estimates of GHG emissions trends by sector from 1990 to 2018, describing the major sources of emissions growth, stability and decline across ten global regions. Overall, the literature and data emphasise that progress towards reducing GHG emissions has been limited. The prominent global pattern is a continuation of underlying drivers with few signs of emerging limits to demand, nor of a deep shift towards the delivery of low and zero carbon services across sectors. We observe a moderate decarbonisation of energy systems in Europe and North America, driven by fuel switching and the increasing penetration of renewables. By contrast, in rapidly industrialising regions, fossil-based energy systems have continuously expanded, only very recently slowing down in their growth. Strong demand for materials, floor area, energy services and travel have driven emissions growth in the industry, buildings and transport sectors, particularly in Eastern Asia, Southern Asia and South-East Asia. An expansion of agriculture into carbon-dense tropical forest areas has driven recent increases in AFOLU emissions in Latin America, South-East Asia and Africa. Identifying, understanding, and tackling the most persistent and climate-damaging trends across sectors is a fundamental concern for research and policy as humanity treads deeper into the Anthropocene.
University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53r1q6x4Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)UNSWorksArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_76669Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90455Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Environmental Research LettersReview . 2021License: CC BYData sources: University of Groningen Research PortalSpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2021Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaEnvironmental Research LettersArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 698 citations 698 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.01% Powered by BIP!
visibility 1visibility views 1 download downloads 55 Powered bymore_vert University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53r1q6x4Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)UNSWorksArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_76669Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90455Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Environmental Research LettersReview . 2021License: CC BYData sources: University of Groningen Research PortalSpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2021Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaEnvironmental Research LettersArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Review , Journal 2021 Norway, Australia, Denmark, Norway, Austria, United States, Germany, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:IOP Publishing Funded by:EC | MAT_STOCKSEC| MAT_STOCKSWilliam F. Lamb; Thomas Wiedmann; Julia Pongratz; Robbie M. Andrew; Monica Crippa; J. G. J. Olivier; Dominik Wiedenhofer; Giulio Mattioli; Alaa Al Khourdajie; Joanna I. House; Shonali Pachauri; María Figueroa; Yamina Saheb; Raphael Slade; Klaus Hubacek; Laixiang Sun; Suzana Kahn Ribeiro; Smail Khennas; Stéphane de la Rue du Can; Lazarus Chapungu; Steven J. Davis; I. A. Bashmakov; Hancheng Dai; Shobhakar Dhakal; Xianjun Tan; Yong Geng; Baihe Gu; Jan C. Minx;AbstractGlobal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be traced to five economic sectors: energy, industry, buildings, transport and AFOLU (agriculture, forestry and other land uses). In this topical review, we synthesise the literature to explain recent trends in global and regional emissions in each of these sectors. To contextualise our review, we present estimates of GHG emissions trends by sector from 1990 to 2018, describing the major sources of emissions growth, stability and decline across ten global regions. Overall, the literature and data emphasise that progress towards reducing GHG emissions has been limited. The prominent global pattern is a continuation of underlying drivers with few signs of emerging limits to demand, nor of a deep shift towards the delivery of low and zero carbon services across sectors. We observe a moderate decarbonisation of energy systems in Europe and North America, driven by fuel switching and the increasing penetration of renewables. By contrast, in rapidly industrialising regions, fossil-based energy systems have continuously expanded, only very recently slowing down in their growth. Strong demand for materials, floor area, energy services and travel have driven emissions growth in the industry, buildings and transport sectors, particularly in Eastern Asia, Southern Asia and South-East Asia. An expansion of agriculture into carbon-dense tropical forest areas has driven recent increases in AFOLU emissions in Latin America, South-East Asia and Africa. Identifying, understanding, and tackling the most persistent and climate-damaging trends across sectors is a fundamental concern for research and policy as humanity treads deeper into the Anthropocene.
University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53r1q6x4Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)UNSWorksArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_76669Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90455Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Environmental Research LettersReview . 2021License: CC BYData sources: University of Groningen Research PortalSpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2021Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaEnvironmental Research LettersArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 698 citations 698 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.01% Powered by BIP!
visibility 1visibility views 1 download downloads 55 Powered bymore_vert University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53r1q6x4Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)UNSWorksArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_76669Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90455Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Environmental Research LettersReview . 2021License: CC BYData sources: University of Groningen Research PortalSpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2021Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaEnvironmental Research LettersArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:UKRI | Bioenergy value chains: W...UKRI| Bioenergy value chains: Whole systems analysis and optimisationAuthors: Pearce, P; Slade, R;handle: 10044/1/57232
Abstract Since 2010, over 700,000 small-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have been installed by households in Great Britain and registered under the feed-in tariff (FiT) scheme. This paper introduces a new agent-based model which simulates this adoption by considering decision-making of individual households based on household income, social network, total capital cost of the PV system, and the payback period of the investment, where the final factor takes into account the economic effect of FiTs. After calibration using Approximate Bayesian Computation, the model successfully simulates observed cumulative and average capacity installed over the period 2010–2016 using historically accurate FiTs; setting different tariffs allows investigation of alternative policy scenarios. Model results show that using simple cost control measures, more installation by October 2016 could have been achieved at lower subsidy cost. The total cost of supporting capacity installed during the period 2010–2016, totalling 2.4 GW, is predicted to be £14 billion, and costs to consumers significantly exceed predictions. The model is further used to project capacity installed up to 2022 for several PV cost, electricity price, and FiT policy scenarios, showing that current tariffs are too low to significantly impact adoption, and falling PV costs are the most important driver of installation.
Imperial College Lon... arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57232Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 40 citations 40 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Imperial College Lon... arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57232Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:UKRI | Bioenergy value chains: W...UKRI| Bioenergy value chains: Whole systems analysis and optimisationAuthors: Pearce, P; Slade, R;handle: 10044/1/57232
Abstract Since 2010, over 700,000 small-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have been installed by households in Great Britain and registered under the feed-in tariff (FiT) scheme. This paper introduces a new agent-based model which simulates this adoption by considering decision-making of individual households based on household income, social network, total capital cost of the PV system, and the payback period of the investment, where the final factor takes into account the economic effect of FiTs. After calibration using Approximate Bayesian Computation, the model successfully simulates observed cumulative and average capacity installed over the period 2010–2016 using historically accurate FiTs; setting different tariffs allows investigation of alternative policy scenarios. Model results show that using simple cost control measures, more installation by October 2016 could have been achieved at lower subsidy cost. The total cost of supporting capacity installed during the period 2010–2016, totalling 2.4 GW, is predicted to be £14 billion, and costs to consumers significantly exceed predictions. The model is further used to project capacity installed up to 2022 for several PV cost, electricity price, and FiT policy scenarios, showing that current tariffs are too low to significantly impact adoption, and falling PV costs are the most important driver of installation.
Imperial College Lon... arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57232Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 40 citations 40 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Imperial College Lon... arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57232Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 United Kingdom, ItalyPublisher:Informa UK Limited Lorenzo Di Lucia; Steve Peterson; Eva Sevigné-Itoiz; Alberto Atzori; Domenico Usai; Raphael Slade; Ausilio Bauen;handle: 11388/240323 , 10044/1/85855
The use of biomass to produce biofuels can lead to both direct and indirect Land Use Change (LUC). While the causes underlying LUCs are complex their quantification is a scientific challenge that h...
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/1747423x.2020.1855265&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/1747423x.2020.1855265&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 United Kingdom, ItalyPublisher:Informa UK Limited Lorenzo Di Lucia; Steve Peterson; Eva Sevigné-Itoiz; Alberto Atzori; Domenico Usai; Raphael Slade; Ausilio Bauen;handle: 11388/240323 , 10044/1/85855
The use of biomass to produce biofuels can lead to both direct and indirect Land Use Change (LUC). While the causes underlying LUCs are complex their quantification is a scientific challenge that h...
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/1747423x.2020.1855265&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/1747423x.2020.1855265&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Slade, R; Bauen, A; Gross, R;doi: 10.1038/nclimate2097
handle: 10044/1/55148
The increased use of bioenergy is mired in a controversy over the environmental and social risks of escalating biomass production. Assessments of global biomass potential published over the past 20 years are reviewed, showing how different levels of deployment necessitate assumptions that could have far-reaching consequences for global agriculture, forestry and land use. Critical future challenges that can be addressed by the scientific community are also identified.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2097&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen 201 citations 201 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2097&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Slade, R; Bauen, A; Gross, R;doi: 10.1038/nclimate2097
handle: 10044/1/55148
The increased use of bioenergy is mired in a controversy over the environmental and social risks of escalating biomass production. Assessments of global biomass potential published over the past 20 years are reviewed, showing how different levels of deployment necessitate assumptions that could have far-reaching consequences for global agriculture, forestry and land use. Critical future challenges that can be addressed by the scientific community are also identified.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2097&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen 201 citations 201 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2097&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Journal 2017 Australia, Australia, United Kingdom, DenmarkPublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | BioEconEC| BioEconVirginia H. Dale; Keith L. Kline; Esther S. Parish; Annette L. Cowie; Robert Emory; Robert W. Malmsheimer; Raphael Slade; Charles Tattersall (Tat) SMITH; Thomas Bently (BEN) Wigley; Niclas S. Bentsen; Göran Berndes; Pierre Bernier; Miguel Brandão; Helena L. Chum; Rocio Diaz‐Chavez; Gustaf Egnell; Leif Gustavsson; Jörg Schweinle; Inge Stupak; Paul Trianosky; Arnaldo Walter; Carly Whittaker; Mark Brown; George Chescheir; Ioannis Dimitriou; Caspar Donnison; Alison Goss Eng; Kevin P. Hoyt; Jennifer C. Jenkins; Kristen Johnson; Charles A. Levesque; Victoria Lockhart; Maria Cristina Negri; Jami E. Nettles; Maria Wellisch;doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12445
handle: 10044/1/55151
AbstractThe ongoing debate about costs and benefits of wood‐pellet based bioenergy production in the southeastern United States (SE USA) requires an understanding of the science and context influencing market decisions associated with its sustainability. Production of pellets has garnered much attention asUSexports have grown from negligible amounts in the early 2000s to 4.6 million metric tonnes in 2015. Currently, 98% of these pellet exports are shipped to Europe to displace coal in power plants. We ask, ‘How is the production of wood pellets in theSE USAaffecting forest systems and the ecosystem services they provide?’ To address this question, we review current forest conditions and the status of the wood products industry, how pellet production affects ecosystem services and biodiversity, and what methods are in place to monitor changes and protect vulnerable systems. Scientific studies provide evidence that wood pellets in theSE USAare a fraction of total forestry operations and can be produced while maintaining or improving forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem services are protected by the requirement to utilize loggers trained to apply scientifically based best management practices in planning and implementing harvest for the export market. Bioenergy markets supplement incomes to private rural landholders and provide an incentive for forest management practices that simultaneously benefit water quality and wildlife and reduce risk of fire and insect outbreaks. Bioenergy also increases the value of forest land to landowners, thereby decreasing likelihood of conversion to nonforest uses. Monitoring and evaluation are essential to verify that regulations and good practices are achieving goals and to enable timely responses if problems arise. Conducting rigorous research to understand how conditions change in response to management choices requires baseline data, monitoring, and appropriate reference scenarios. Long‐term monitoring data on forest conditions should be publicly accessible and utilized to inform adaptive management.
GCB Bioenergy arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55151Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryCopenhagen University Research Information SystemArticle . 2017Data sources: Copenhagen University Research Information SystemUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)USC Research Bank research dataArticle . 2017License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12445&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 55 citations 55 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert GCB Bioenergy arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55151Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryCopenhagen University Research Information SystemArticle . 2017Data sources: Copenhagen University Research Information SystemUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)USC Research Bank research dataArticle . 2017License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12445&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Journal 2017 Australia, Australia, United Kingdom, DenmarkPublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | BioEconEC| BioEconVirginia H. Dale; Keith L. Kline; Esther S. Parish; Annette L. Cowie; Robert Emory; Robert W. Malmsheimer; Raphael Slade; Charles Tattersall (Tat) SMITH; Thomas Bently (BEN) Wigley; Niclas S. Bentsen; Göran Berndes; Pierre Bernier; Miguel Brandão; Helena L. Chum; Rocio Diaz‐Chavez; Gustaf Egnell; Leif Gustavsson; Jörg Schweinle; Inge Stupak; Paul Trianosky; Arnaldo Walter; Carly Whittaker; Mark Brown; George Chescheir; Ioannis Dimitriou; Caspar Donnison; Alison Goss Eng; Kevin P. Hoyt; Jennifer C. Jenkins; Kristen Johnson; Charles A. Levesque; Victoria Lockhart; Maria Cristina Negri; Jami E. Nettles; Maria Wellisch;doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12445
handle: 10044/1/55151
AbstractThe ongoing debate about costs and benefits of wood‐pellet based bioenergy production in the southeastern United States (SE USA) requires an understanding of the science and context influencing market decisions associated with its sustainability. Production of pellets has garnered much attention asUSexports have grown from negligible amounts in the early 2000s to 4.6 million metric tonnes in 2015. Currently, 98% of these pellet exports are shipped to Europe to displace coal in power plants. We ask, ‘How is the production of wood pellets in theSE USAaffecting forest systems and the ecosystem services they provide?’ To address this question, we review current forest conditions and the status of the wood products industry, how pellet production affects ecosystem services and biodiversity, and what methods are in place to monitor changes and protect vulnerable systems. Scientific studies provide evidence that wood pellets in theSE USAare a fraction of total forestry operations and can be produced while maintaining or improving forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem services are protected by the requirement to utilize loggers trained to apply scientifically based best management practices in planning and implementing harvest for the export market. Bioenergy markets supplement incomes to private rural landholders and provide an incentive for forest management practices that simultaneously benefit water quality and wildlife and reduce risk of fire and insect outbreaks. Bioenergy also increases the value of forest land to landowners, thereby decreasing likelihood of conversion to nonforest uses. Monitoring and evaluation are essential to verify that regulations and good practices are achieving goals and to enable timely responses if problems arise. Conducting rigorous research to understand how conditions change in response to management choices requires baseline data, monitoring, and appropriate reference scenarios. Long‐term monitoring data on forest conditions should be publicly accessible and utilized to inform adaptive management.
GCB Bioenergy arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55151Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryCopenhagen University Research Information SystemArticle . 2017Data sources: Copenhagen University Research Information SystemUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)USC Research Bank research dataArticle . 2017License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12445&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 55 citations 55 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert GCB Bioenergy arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55151Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryCopenhagen University Research Information SystemArticle . 2017Data sources: Copenhagen University Research Information SystemUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)USC Research Bank research dataArticle . 2017License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12445&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 Netherlands, United KingdomPublisher:Wiley Rebecca Mawhood; Evangelos Gazis; Sierk de Jong; Ric Hoefnagels; Raphael Slade;doi: 10.1002/bbb.1644
handle: 10044/1/29968
AbstractAviation is responsible for an increasing share of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Decarbonization to 2050 is expected to rely on renewable jet fuel (RJF) derived from biomass, but this represents a radical departure from the existing regime of petroleum‐based fuels. Increased market deployment will require significant cost reductions, alongside adaptation of existing supply chains and infrastructure. This paper maps development and manufacturing efforts for six RJF production pathways expected to reach commercialization in the next 5–10 years. A Rapid Evidence Assessment was conducted to evaluate the technological and commercial maturity of each pathway and progress toward international certification, using the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative's Fuel Readiness Level (FRL) framework. Planned and operational facilities have been cataloged alongside partnerships with the aviation industry. Policy and economic factors likely to affect future development and deployment are considered. Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (FRL 9) is the most developed pathway. It is ASTM certified, has fuelled the majority of RJF flights to date, and is produced at three commercial‐scale facilities. Fischer‐Tropsch derived fuels are moving toward the start‐up of first commercial facilities (FRL 7 and 8), although widespread deployment seems unlikely under current market conditions. The Direct Sugars to Hydrocarbons conversion pathway (FRL 5–7) is being championed by Amyris and Total in Brazil, but has yet to be demonstrated at scale. Other pathways are in the demonstration and pilot phases (FRL 4–6). Despite growing interest in RJF, demand and production volumes remain negligible. Development of supportive policy is likely to be critical to future deployment. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversitySpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2016Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1644&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 170 citations 170 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversitySpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2016Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1644&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 Netherlands, United KingdomPublisher:Wiley Rebecca Mawhood; Evangelos Gazis; Sierk de Jong; Ric Hoefnagels; Raphael Slade;doi: 10.1002/bbb.1644
handle: 10044/1/29968
AbstractAviation is responsible for an increasing share of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Decarbonization to 2050 is expected to rely on renewable jet fuel (RJF) derived from biomass, but this represents a radical departure from the existing regime of petroleum‐based fuels. Increased market deployment will require significant cost reductions, alongside adaptation of existing supply chains and infrastructure. This paper maps development and manufacturing efforts for six RJF production pathways expected to reach commercialization in the next 5–10 years. A Rapid Evidence Assessment was conducted to evaluate the technological and commercial maturity of each pathway and progress toward international certification, using the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative's Fuel Readiness Level (FRL) framework. Planned and operational facilities have been cataloged alongside partnerships with the aviation industry. Policy and economic factors likely to affect future development and deployment are considered. Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (FRL 9) is the most developed pathway. It is ASTM certified, has fuelled the majority of RJF flights to date, and is produced at three commercial‐scale facilities. Fischer‐Tropsch derived fuels are moving toward the start‐up of first commercial facilities (FRL 7 and 8), although widespread deployment seems unlikely under current market conditions. The Direct Sugars to Hydrocarbons conversion pathway (FRL 5–7) is being championed by Amyris and Total in Brazil, but has yet to be demonstrated at scale. Other pathways are in the demonstration and pilot phases (FRL 4–6). Despite growing interest in RJF, demand and production volumes remain negligible. Development of supportive policy is likely to be critical to future deployment. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversitySpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2016Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1644&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 170 citations 170 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversitySpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2016Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1644&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 NetherlandsPublisher:Wiley de Jong, S.A.; Hoefnagels, E.T.A.; Faaij, André; Slade, Raphael; Mawhood, Rebecca; Junginger, H.M.;doi: 10.1002/bbb.1613
AbstractThis study compares the short‐term economic feasibility of six conversion pathways for renewable jet fuel (RJF) production. The assessment combines (i) a harmonized techno‐economic analysis of conversion pathways expected to be certified for use in commercial aviation by 2020, (ii) a pioneer plant analysis taking into account technological immaturity, and (iii) a quantified assessment of the merits of co‐producing RJF alongside existing European supply chains in the pulp, wheat ethanol, and beet sugar industries. None of the pathways assessed are able to reach price parity with petroleum‐derived jet fuel in the short term. The pioneer plant analysis suggests that the hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) pathway is currently the best option; the technology achieves the lowest minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of 29.3 € GJ−1 (1289 € t−1) and the technology is deployed on commercial scale already. In the short term, nth plant analysis shows hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and pyrolysis emerging as promising alternatives, yielding MFSPs of 21.4 € GJ−1 (939 € t−1) and 30.2 € GJ−1 (1326 € t−1), respectively. The pioneer plant analysis shows considerable MFSP increases for producing drop‐in fuels using HTL and pyrolysis as both technologies are relatively immature. Hence, further RD&D efforts into these pathways are recommended. Co‐production strategies decrease the MFSP by 4–8% compared to greenfield production. Integration of process units and material and energy flows is expected to lead to further cost reductions. As such, co‐production can be a particularly useful strategy to progress emerging technologies to commercial scale. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversityBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1613&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 226 citations 226 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversityBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1613&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 NetherlandsPublisher:Wiley de Jong, S.A.; Hoefnagels, E.T.A.; Faaij, André; Slade, Raphael; Mawhood, Rebecca; Junginger, H.M.;doi: 10.1002/bbb.1613
AbstractThis study compares the short‐term economic feasibility of six conversion pathways for renewable jet fuel (RJF) production. The assessment combines (i) a harmonized techno‐economic analysis of conversion pathways expected to be certified for use in commercial aviation by 2020, (ii) a pioneer plant analysis taking into account technological immaturity, and (iii) a quantified assessment of the merits of co‐producing RJF alongside existing European supply chains in the pulp, wheat ethanol, and beet sugar industries. None of the pathways assessed are able to reach price parity with petroleum‐derived jet fuel in the short term. The pioneer plant analysis suggests that the hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) pathway is currently the best option; the technology achieves the lowest minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of 29.3 € GJ−1 (1289 € t−1) and the technology is deployed on commercial scale already. In the short term, nth plant analysis shows hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and pyrolysis emerging as promising alternatives, yielding MFSPs of 21.4 € GJ−1 (939 € t−1) and 30.2 € GJ−1 (1326 € t−1), respectively. The pioneer plant analysis shows considerable MFSP increases for producing drop‐in fuels using HTL and pyrolysis as both technologies are relatively immature. Hence, further RD&D efforts into these pathways are recommended. Co‐production strategies decrease the MFSP by 4–8% compared to greenfield production. Integration of process units and material and energy flows is expected to lead to further cost reductions. As such, co‐production can be a particularly useful strategy to progress emerging technologies to commercial scale. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversityBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1613&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 226 citations 226 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversityBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1613&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2009Publisher:Elsevier BV Raphael Slade; Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal; Maria Edlund; Antoine Margeot; Frédéric Monot;pmid: 19502048
The use of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of biofuels will be unavoidable if liquid fossil fuels are to be replaced by renewable and sustainable alternatives. Ethanol accounts for the majority of biofuel use worldwide, and the prospect of its biological production from abundant lignocellulosic feedstocks is attractive. The recalcitrance of these raw materials still renders proposed processes complex and costly, but there are grounds for optimism. The application of new, engineered enzyme systems for cellulose hydrolysis, the construction of inhibitor-tolerant pentose-fermenting industrial yeast strains, combined with optimized process integration promise significant improvements. The opportunity to test these advances in pilot plants paves the way for large-scale units. This review summarizes recent progress in this field, including the validation at pilot scale, and the economic and environmental impacts of this production pathway.
Current Opinion in B... arrow_drop_down Current Opinion in BiotechnologyArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu323 citations 323 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Current Opinion in B... arrow_drop_down Current Opinion in BiotechnologyArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2009Publisher:Elsevier BV Raphael Slade; Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal; Maria Edlund; Antoine Margeot; Frédéric Monot;pmid: 19502048
The use of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of biofuels will be unavoidable if liquid fossil fuels are to be replaced by renewable and sustainable alternatives. Ethanol accounts for the majority of biofuel use worldwide, and the prospect of its biological production from abundant lignocellulosic feedstocks is attractive. The recalcitrance of these raw materials still renders proposed processes complex and costly, but there are grounds for optimism. The application of new, engineered enzyme systems for cellulose hydrolysis, the construction of inhibitor-tolerant pentose-fermenting industrial yeast strains, combined with optimized process integration promise significant improvements. The opportunity to test these advances in pilot plants paves the way for large-scale units. This review summarizes recent progress in this field, including the validation at pilot scale, and the economic and environmental impacts of this production pathway.
Current Opinion in B... arrow_drop_down Current Opinion in BiotechnologyArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu323 citations 323 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Current Opinion in B... arrow_drop_down Current Opinion in BiotechnologyArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object , Other literature type 2016Publisher:ETA-Florence Renewable Energies Authors: C. Jamieson; O. McLaughlin; Rebecca Mawhood; Raphael Slade;Globally, rice straw is the third largest agricultural residue, behind sugarcane bagasse and maize straw. Approximately one billion tonnes of rice straw are produced annually, but only a small proportion of this is used. The primary management strategies of rice straw farmers are burning in the fields and mulching. Burning produces harmful carcinogenic and greenhouse gas emissions and mulching releases high levels of methane which have an even greater greenhouse gas effect than the CO2 released from burning. In comparison, using rice straw for bioenergy has considerable advantages. This study examines the barriers to the use of rice straw for bioenergy, and the effectiveness of the existing policy mechanisms in seven major rice producing nations: Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Data on policy effectiveness was obtained from semi-structured interviews with experts on rice straw use, based at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) based in the Philippines. This was combined with a detailed evaluation of existing government policies and a ranking exercise to identify which policy aspects were considered most successful to prohibit burning and encourage bioenergy use. Barriers to the widespread use of rice straw which can be categorised into biochemical, logistical and infrastructural. The biochemical barriers include the low nutritive quality, high lignin and silica content which complicates the breaking down of rice straw into its useful components. The logistical barriers are the wide dispersal of rice straw and intra-annual fluctuations in availability and the resulting issues created in transporting the resource in sufficient quantity to where it can be utilised at the right time. The final group of barriers include the cultural practices of rice straw farmers, fossil fuel subsidies skewing the market and the support systems in place for conventional substitutes of rice straw products, such as the infrastructure in place to process and produce petroleum. Implementation is critical to policy success. Ineffective implementation was found to arise from a combination of factors including: institutional coordination issues, resource constraints, political interference, corruption and unintended consequences of policies. The interviews revealed that experts believed engaging with farmers in their rice straw management was the most important form of intervention a government could pursue. Every nation shows some evidence of attempting to engage farmers but efforts are sporadic and mainly left to agricultural extension workers to pursue. Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 6-9 June 2016, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 1540-1554
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5071/24theubce2016-4av.3.20&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5071/24theubce2016-4av.3.20&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object , Other literature type 2016Publisher:ETA-Florence Renewable Energies Authors: C. Jamieson; O. McLaughlin; Rebecca Mawhood; Raphael Slade;Globally, rice straw is the third largest agricultural residue, behind sugarcane bagasse and maize straw. Approximately one billion tonnes of rice straw are produced annually, but only a small proportion of this is used. The primary management strategies of rice straw farmers are burning in the fields and mulching. Burning produces harmful carcinogenic and greenhouse gas emissions and mulching releases high levels of methane which have an even greater greenhouse gas effect than the CO2 released from burning. In comparison, using rice straw for bioenergy has considerable advantages. This study examines the barriers to the use of rice straw for bioenergy, and the effectiveness of the existing policy mechanisms in seven major rice producing nations: Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Data on policy effectiveness was obtained from semi-structured interviews with experts on rice straw use, based at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) based in the Philippines. This was combined with a detailed evaluation of existing government policies and a ranking exercise to identify which policy aspects were considered most successful to prohibit burning and encourage bioenergy use. Barriers to the widespread use of rice straw which can be categorised into biochemical, logistical and infrastructural. The biochemical barriers include the low nutritive quality, high lignin and silica content which complicates the breaking down of rice straw into its useful components. The logistical barriers are the wide dispersal of rice straw and intra-annual fluctuations in availability and the resulting issues created in transporting the resource in sufficient quantity to where it can be utilised at the right time. The final group of barriers include the cultural practices of rice straw farmers, fossil fuel subsidies skewing the market and the support systems in place for conventional substitutes of rice straw products, such as the infrastructure in place to process and produce petroleum. Implementation is critical to policy success. Ineffective implementation was found to arise from a combination of factors including: institutional coordination issues, resource constraints, political interference, corruption and unintended consequences of policies. The interviews revealed that experts believed engaging with farmers in their rice straw management was the most important form of intervention a government could pursue. Every nation shows some evidence of attempting to engage farmers but efforts are sporadic and mainly left to agricultural extension workers to pursue. Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 6-9 June 2016, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 1540-1554
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5071/24theubce2016-4av.3.20&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5071/24theubce2016-4av.3.20&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2008 ItalyPublisher:Elsevier BV Jablonski, S; Pantaleo, A; Bauen, A; Pearson, P; Panoutsou, C; Slade, R;handle: 11586/15879
How large is the potential demand for bio-heat in the UK? Whilst most research has focused on the supply of biomass for energy production, an understanding of the potential demand is crucial to the uptake of heat from bioenergy. We have designed a systematic framework utilising market segmentation techniques to assess the potential demand for biomass heat in the UK. First, the heat market is divided into relevant segments, characterised in terms of their final energy consumption, technological and fuel supply options. Second, the key technical, economic and organisational factors that affect the uptake of bioenergy in each heat segment are identified, classified and then analysed to reveal which could be strong barriers, which could be surmounted easily, and for which bioenergy heat represents an improvement compared to alternatives. The defined framework is applied to the UK residential sector. We identify provisionally the most promising market segments for bioenergy heat, and their current levels of energy demand. We find that, depending on the assumptions, the present potential demand for bio-heat in the UK residential sector ranges between 3% (conservative estimate) and 31% (optimistic estimate) of the total energy consumed in the heat market.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu22 citations 22 popularity Average influence Top 10% impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2008 ItalyPublisher:Elsevier BV Jablonski, S; Pantaleo, A; Bauen, A; Pearson, P; Panoutsou, C; Slade, R;handle: 11586/15879
How large is the potential demand for bio-heat in the UK? Whilst most research has focused on the supply of biomass for energy production, an understanding of the potential demand is crucial to the uptake of heat from bioenergy. We have designed a systematic framework utilising market segmentation techniques to assess the potential demand for biomass heat in the UK. First, the heat market is divided into relevant segments, characterised in terms of their final energy consumption, technological and fuel supply options. Second, the key technical, economic and organisational factors that affect the uptake of bioenergy in each heat segment are identified, classified and then analysed to reveal which could be strong barriers, which could be surmounted easily, and for which bioenergy heat represents an improvement compared to alternatives. The defined framework is applied to the UK residential sector. We identify provisionally the most promising market segments for bioenergy heat, and their current levels of energy demand. We find that, depending on the assumptions, the present potential demand for bio-heat in the UK residential sector ranges between 3% (conservative estimate) and 31% (optimistic estimate) of the total energy consumed in the heat market.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu22 citations 22 popularity Average influence Top 10% impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Review , Journal 2021 Norway, Australia, Denmark, Norway, Austria, United States, Germany, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:IOP Publishing Funded by:EC | MAT_STOCKSEC| MAT_STOCKSWilliam F. Lamb; Thomas Wiedmann; Julia Pongratz; Robbie M. Andrew; Monica Crippa; J. G. J. Olivier; Dominik Wiedenhofer; Giulio Mattioli; Alaa Al Khourdajie; Joanna I. House; Shonali Pachauri; María Figueroa; Yamina Saheb; Raphael Slade; Klaus Hubacek; Laixiang Sun; Suzana Kahn Ribeiro; Smail Khennas; Stéphane de la Rue du Can; Lazarus Chapungu; Steven J. Davis; I. A. Bashmakov; Hancheng Dai; Shobhakar Dhakal; Xianjun Tan; Yong Geng; Baihe Gu; Jan C. Minx;AbstractGlobal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be traced to five economic sectors: energy, industry, buildings, transport and AFOLU (agriculture, forestry and other land uses). In this topical review, we synthesise the literature to explain recent trends in global and regional emissions in each of these sectors. To contextualise our review, we present estimates of GHG emissions trends by sector from 1990 to 2018, describing the major sources of emissions growth, stability and decline across ten global regions. Overall, the literature and data emphasise that progress towards reducing GHG emissions has been limited. The prominent global pattern is a continuation of underlying drivers with few signs of emerging limits to demand, nor of a deep shift towards the delivery of low and zero carbon services across sectors. We observe a moderate decarbonisation of energy systems in Europe and North America, driven by fuel switching and the increasing penetration of renewables. By contrast, in rapidly industrialising regions, fossil-based energy systems have continuously expanded, only very recently slowing down in their growth. Strong demand for materials, floor area, energy services and travel have driven emissions growth in the industry, buildings and transport sectors, particularly in Eastern Asia, Southern Asia and South-East Asia. An expansion of agriculture into carbon-dense tropical forest areas has driven recent increases in AFOLU emissions in Latin America, South-East Asia and Africa. Identifying, understanding, and tackling the most persistent and climate-damaging trends across sectors is a fundamental concern for research and policy as humanity treads deeper into the Anthropocene.
University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53r1q6x4Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)UNSWorksArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_76669Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90455Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Environmental Research LettersReview . 2021License: CC BYData sources: University of Groningen Research PortalSpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2021Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaEnvironmental Research LettersArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 698 citations 698 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.01% Powered by BIP!
visibility 1visibility views 1 download downloads 55 Powered bymore_vert University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53r1q6x4Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)UNSWorksArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_76669Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90455Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Environmental Research LettersReview . 2021License: CC BYData sources: University of Groningen Research PortalSpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2021Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaEnvironmental Research LettersArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Review , Journal 2021 Norway, Australia, Denmark, Norway, Austria, United States, Germany, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:IOP Publishing Funded by:EC | MAT_STOCKSEC| MAT_STOCKSWilliam F. Lamb; Thomas Wiedmann; Julia Pongratz; Robbie M. Andrew; Monica Crippa; J. G. J. Olivier; Dominik Wiedenhofer; Giulio Mattioli; Alaa Al Khourdajie; Joanna I. House; Shonali Pachauri; María Figueroa; Yamina Saheb; Raphael Slade; Klaus Hubacek; Laixiang Sun; Suzana Kahn Ribeiro; Smail Khennas; Stéphane de la Rue du Can; Lazarus Chapungu; Steven J. Davis; I. A. Bashmakov; Hancheng Dai; Shobhakar Dhakal; Xianjun Tan; Yong Geng; Baihe Gu; Jan C. Minx;AbstractGlobal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be traced to five economic sectors: energy, industry, buildings, transport and AFOLU (agriculture, forestry and other land uses). In this topical review, we synthesise the literature to explain recent trends in global and regional emissions in each of these sectors. To contextualise our review, we present estimates of GHG emissions trends by sector from 1990 to 2018, describing the major sources of emissions growth, stability and decline across ten global regions. Overall, the literature and data emphasise that progress towards reducing GHG emissions has been limited. The prominent global pattern is a continuation of underlying drivers with few signs of emerging limits to demand, nor of a deep shift towards the delivery of low and zero carbon services across sectors. We observe a moderate decarbonisation of energy systems in Europe and North America, driven by fuel switching and the increasing penetration of renewables. By contrast, in rapidly industrialising regions, fossil-based energy systems have continuously expanded, only very recently slowing down in their growth. Strong demand for materials, floor area, energy services and travel have driven emissions growth in the industry, buildings and transport sectors, particularly in Eastern Asia, Southern Asia and South-East Asia. An expansion of agriculture into carbon-dense tropical forest areas has driven recent increases in AFOLU emissions in Latin America, South-East Asia and Africa. Identifying, understanding, and tackling the most persistent and climate-damaging trends across sectors is a fundamental concern for research and policy as humanity treads deeper into the Anthropocene.
University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53r1q6x4Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)UNSWorksArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_76669Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90455Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Environmental Research LettersReview . 2021License: CC BYData sources: University of Groningen Research PortalSpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2021Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaEnvironmental Research LettersArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 698 citations 698 popularity Top 0.1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 0.01% Powered by BIP!
visibility 1visibility views 1 download downloads 55 Powered bymore_vert University of Califo... arrow_drop_down University of California: eScholarshipArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCFull-Text: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53r1q6x4Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)UNSWorksArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_76669Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90455Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Environmental Research LettersReview . 2021License: CC BYData sources: University of Groningen Research PortalSpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryeScholarship - University of CaliforniaArticle . 2021Data sources: eScholarship - University of CaliforniaEnvironmental Research LettersArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedData sources: European Union Open Data PortalUniversity of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)Article . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:UKRI | Bioenergy value chains: W...UKRI| Bioenergy value chains: Whole systems analysis and optimisationAuthors: Pearce, P; Slade, R;handle: 10044/1/57232
Abstract Since 2010, over 700,000 small-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have been installed by households in Great Britain and registered under the feed-in tariff (FiT) scheme. This paper introduces a new agent-based model which simulates this adoption by considering decision-making of individual households based on household income, social network, total capital cost of the PV system, and the payback period of the investment, where the final factor takes into account the economic effect of FiTs. After calibration using Approximate Bayesian Computation, the model successfully simulates observed cumulative and average capacity installed over the period 2010–2016 using historically accurate FiTs; setting different tariffs allows investigation of alternative policy scenarios. Model results show that using simple cost control measures, more installation by October 2016 could have been achieved at lower subsidy cost. The total cost of supporting capacity installed during the period 2010–2016, totalling 2.4 GW, is predicted to be £14 billion, and costs to consumers significantly exceed predictions. The model is further used to project capacity installed up to 2022 for several PV cost, electricity price, and FiT policy scenarios, showing that current tariffs are too low to significantly impact adoption, and falling PV costs are the most important driver of installation.
Imperial College Lon... arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57232Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 40 citations 40 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Imperial College Lon... arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57232Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018 United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:UKRI | Bioenergy value chains: W...UKRI| Bioenergy value chains: Whole systems analysis and optimisationAuthors: Pearce, P; Slade, R;handle: 10044/1/57232
Abstract Since 2010, over 700,000 small-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have been installed by households in Great Britain and registered under the feed-in tariff (FiT) scheme. This paper introduces a new agent-based model which simulates this adoption by considering decision-making of individual households based on household income, social network, total capital cost of the PV system, and the payback period of the investment, where the final factor takes into account the economic effect of FiTs. After calibration using Approximate Bayesian Computation, the model successfully simulates observed cumulative and average capacity installed over the period 2010–2016 using historically accurate FiTs; setting different tariffs allows investigation of alternative policy scenarios. Model results show that using simple cost control measures, more installation by October 2016 could have been achieved at lower subsidy cost. The total cost of supporting capacity installed during the period 2010–2016, totalling 2.4 GW, is predicted to be £14 billion, and costs to consumers significantly exceed predictions. The model is further used to project capacity installed up to 2022 for several PV cost, electricity price, and FiT policy scenarios, showing that current tariffs are too low to significantly impact adoption, and falling PV costs are the most important driver of installation.
Imperial College Lon... arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57232Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 40 citations 40 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Imperial College Lon... arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2018License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57232Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2018Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repositoryadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 United Kingdom, ItalyPublisher:Informa UK Limited Lorenzo Di Lucia; Steve Peterson; Eva Sevigné-Itoiz; Alberto Atzori; Domenico Usai; Raphael Slade; Ausilio Bauen;handle: 11388/240323 , 10044/1/85855
The use of biomass to produce biofuels can lead to both direct and indirect Land Use Change (LUC). While the causes underlying LUCs are complex their quantification is a scientific challenge that h...
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/1747423x.2020.1855265&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/1747423x.2020.1855265&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020 United Kingdom, ItalyPublisher:Informa UK Limited Lorenzo Di Lucia; Steve Peterson; Eva Sevigné-Itoiz; Alberto Atzori; Domenico Usai; Raphael Slade; Ausilio Bauen;handle: 11388/240323 , 10044/1/85855
The use of biomass to produce biofuels can lead to both direct and indirect Land Use Change (LUC). While the causes underlying LUCs are complex their quantification is a scientific challenge that h...
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/1747423x.2020.1855265&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 5 citations 5 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1080/1747423x.2020.1855265&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Slade, R; Bauen, A; Gross, R;doi: 10.1038/nclimate2097
handle: 10044/1/55148
The increased use of bioenergy is mired in a controversy over the environmental and social risks of escalating biomass production. Assessments of global biomass potential published over the past 20 years are reviewed, showing how different levels of deployment necessitate assumptions that could have far-reaching consequences for global agriculture, forestry and land use. Critical future challenges that can be addressed by the scientific community are also identified.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2097&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen 201 citations 201 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2097&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2014 United KingdomPublisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC Authors: Slade, R; Bauen, A; Gross, R;doi: 10.1038/nclimate2097
handle: 10044/1/55148
The increased use of bioenergy is mired in a controversy over the environmental and social risks of escalating biomass production. Assessments of global biomass potential published over the past 20 years are reviewed, showing how different levels of deployment necessitate assumptions that could have far-reaching consequences for global agriculture, forestry and land use. Critical future challenges that can be addressed by the scientific community are also identified.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2097&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen 201 citations 201 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1038/nclimate2097&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Journal 2017 Australia, Australia, United Kingdom, DenmarkPublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | BioEconEC| BioEconVirginia H. Dale; Keith L. Kline; Esther S. Parish; Annette L. Cowie; Robert Emory; Robert W. Malmsheimer; Raphael Slade; Charles Tattersall (Tat) SMITH; Thomas Bently (BEN) Wigley; Niclas S. Bentsen; Göran Berndes; Pierre Bernier; Miguel Brandão; Helena L. Chum; Rocio Diaz‐Chavez; Gustaf Egnell; Leif Gustavsson; Jörg Schweinle; Inge Stupak; Paul Trianosky; Arnaldo Walter; Carly Whittaker; Mark Brown; George Chescheir; Ioannis Dimitriou; Caspar Donnison; Alison Goss Eng; Kevin P. Hoyt; Jennifer C. Jenkins; Kristen Johnson; Charles A. Levesque; Victoria Lockhart; Maria Cristina Negri; Jami E. Nettles; Maria Wellisch;doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12445
handle: 10044/1/55151
AbstractThe ongoing debate about costs and benefits of wood‐pellet based bioenergy production in the southeastern United States (SE USA) requires an understanding of the science and context influencing market decisions associated with its sustainability. Production of pellets has garnered much attention asUSexports have grown from negligible amounts in the early 2000s to 4.6 million metric tonnes in 2015. Currently, 98% of these pellet exports are shipped to Europe to displace coal in power plants. We ask, ‘How is the production of wood pellets in theSE USAaffecting forest systems and the ecosystem services they provide?’ To address this question, we review current forest conditions and the status of the wood products industry, how pellet production affects ecosystem services and biodiversity, and what methods are in place to monitor changes and protect vulnerable systems. Scientific studies provide evidence that wood pellets in theSE USAare a fraction of total forestry operations and can be produced while maintaining or improving forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem services are protected by the requirement to utilize loggers trained to apply scientifically based best management practices in planning and implementing harvest for the export market. Bioenergy markets supplement incomes to private rural landholders and provide an incentive for forest management practices that simultaneously benefit water quality and wildlife and reduce risk of fire and insect outbreaks. Bioenergy also increases the value of forest land to landowners, thereby decreasing likelihood of conversion to nonforest uses. Monitoring and evaluation are essential to verify that regulations and good practices are achieving goals and to enable timely responses if problems arise. Conducting rigorous research to understand how conditions change in response to management choices requires baseline data, monitoring, and appropriate reference scenarios. Long‐term monitoring data on forest conditions should be publicly accessible and utilized to inform adaptive management.
GCB Bioenergy arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55151Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryCopenhagen University Research Information SystemArticle . 2017Data sources: Copenhagen University Research Information SystemUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)USC Research Bank research dataArticle . 2017License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12445&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 55 citations 55 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert GCB Bioenergy arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55151Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryCopenhagen University Research Information SystemArticle . 2017Data sources: Copenhagen University Research Information SystemUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)USC Research Bank research dataArticle . 2017License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12445&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Journal 2017 Australia, Australia, United Kingdom, DenmarkPublisher:Wiley Funded by:EC | BioEconEC| BioEconVirginia H. Dale; Keith L. Kline; Esther S. Parish; Annette L. Cowie; Robert Emory; Robert W. Malmsheimer; Raphael Slade; Charles Tattersall (Tat) SMITH; Thomas Bently (BEN) Wigley; Niclas S. Bentsen; Göran Berndes; Pierre Bernier; Miguel Brandão; Helena L. Chum; Rocio Diaz‐Chavez; Gustaf Egnell; Leif Gustavsson; Jörg Schweinle; Inge Stupak; Paul Trianosky; Arnaldo Walter; Carly Whittaker; Mark Brown; George Chescheir; Ioannis Dimitriou; Caspar Donnison; Alison Goss Eng; Kevin P. Hoyt; Jennifer C. Jenkins; Kristen Johnson; Charles A. Levesque; Victoria Lockhart; Maria Cristina Negri; Jami E. Nettles; Maria Wellisch;doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12445
handle: 10044/1/55151
AbstractThe ongoing debate about costs and benefits of wood‐pellet based bioenergy production in the southeastern United States (SE USA) requires an understanding of the science and context influencing market decisions associated with its sustainability. Production of pellets has garnered much attention asUSexports have grown from negligible amounts in the early 2000s to 4.6 million metric tonnes in 2015. Currently, 98% of these pellet exports are shipped to Europe to displace coal in power plants. We ask, ‘How is the production of wood pellets in theSE USAaffecting forest systems and the ecosystem services they provide?’ To address this question, we review current forest conditions and the status of the wood products industry, how pellet production affects ecosystem services and biodiversity, and what methods are in place to monitor changes and protect vulnerable systems. Scientific studies provide evidence that wood pellets in theSE USAare a fraction of total forestry operations and can be produced while maintaining or improving forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem services are protected by the requirement to utilize loggers trained to apply scientifically based best management practices in planning and implementing harvest for the export market. Bioenergy markets supplement incomes to private rural landholders and provide an incentive for forest management practices that simultaneously benefit water quality and wildlife and reduce risk of fire and insect outbreaks. Bioenergy also increases the value of forest land to landowners, thereby decreasing likelihood of conversion to nonforest uses. Monitoring and evaluation are essential to verify that regulations and good practices are achieving goals and to enable timely responses if problems arise. Conducting rigorous research to understand how conditions change in response to management choices requires baseline data, monitoring, and appropriate reference scenarios. Long‐term monitoring data on forest conditions should be publicly accessible and utilized to inform adaptive management.
GCB Bioenergy arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55151Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryCopenhagen University Research Information SystemArticle . 2017Data sources: Copenhagen University Research Information SystemUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)USC Research Bank research dataArticle . 2017License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12445&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 55 citations 55 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert GCB Bioenergy arrow_drop_down Imperial College London: SpiralArticle . 2017License: CC BYFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55151Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2017Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryCopenhagen University Research Information SystemArticle . 2017Data sources: Copenhagen University Research Information SystemUniversity of Copenhagen: ResearchArticle . 2017Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)USC Research Bank research dataArticle . 2017License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1111/gcbb.12445&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 Netherlands, United KingdomPublisher:Wiley Rebecca Mawhood; Evangelos Gazis; Sierk de Jong; Ric Hoefnagels; Raphael Slade;doi: 10.1002/bbb.1644
handle: 10044/1/29968
AbstractAviation is responsible for an increasing share of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Decarbonization to 2050 is expected to rely on renewable jet fuel (RJF) derived from biomass, but this represents a radical departure from the existing regime of petroleum‐based fuels. Increased market deployment will require significant cost reductions, alongside adaptation of existing supply chains and infrastructure. This paper maps development and manufacturing efforts for six RJF production pathways expected to reach commercialization in the next 5–10 years. A Rapid Evidence Assessment was conducted to evaluate the technological and commercial maturity of each pathway and progress toward international certification, using the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative's Fuel Readiness Level (FRL) framework. Planned and operational facilities have been cataloged alongside partnerships with the aviation industry. Policy and economic factors likely to affect future development and deployment are considered. Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (FRL 9) is the most developed pathway. It is ASTM certified, has fuelled the majority of RJF flights to date, and is produced at three commercial‐scale facilities. Fischer‐Tropsch derived fuels are moving toward the start‐up of first commercial facilities (FRL 7 and 8), although widespread deployment seems unlikely under current market conditions. The Direct Sugars to Hydrocarbons conversion pathway (FRL 5–7) is being championed by Amyris and Total in Brazil, but has yet to be demonstrated at scale. Other pathways are in the demonstration and pilot phases (FRL 4–6). Despite growing interest in RJF, demand and production volumes remain negligible. Development of supportive policy is likely to be critical to future deployment. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversitySpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2016Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1644&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 170 citations 170 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversitySpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2016Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1644&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 Netherlands, United KingdomPublisher:Wiley Rebecca Mawhood; Evangelos Gazis; Sierk de Jong; Ric Hoefnagels; Raphael Slade;doi: 10.1002/bbb.1644
handle: 10044/1/29968
AbstractAviation is responsible for an increasing share of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Decarbonization to 2050 is expected to rely on renewable jet fuel (RJF) derived from biomass, but this represents a radical departure from the existing regime of petroleum‐based fuels. Increased market deployment will require significant cost reductions, alongside adaptation of existing supply chains and infrastructure. This paper maps development and manufacturing efforts for six RJF production pathways expected to reach commercialization in the next 5–10 years. A Rapid Evidence Assessment was conducted to evaluate the technological and commercial maturity of each pathway and progress toward international certification, using the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative's Fuel Readiness Level (FRL) framework. Planned and operational facilities have been cataloged alongside partnerships with the aviation industry. Policy and economic factors likely to affect future development and deployment are considered. Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (FRL 9) is the most developed pathway. It is ASTM certified, has fuelled the majority of RJF flights to date, and is produced at three commercial‐scale facilities. Fischer‐Tropsch derived fuels are moving toward the start‐up of first commercial facilities (FRL 7 and 8), although widespread deployment seems unlikely under current market conditions. The Direct Sugars to Hydrocarbons conversion pathway (FRL 5–7) is being championed by Amyris and Total in Brazil, but has yet to be demonstrated at scale. Other pathways are in the demonstration and pilot phases (FRL 4–6). Despite growing interest in RJF, demand and production volumes remain negligible. Development of supportive policy is likely to be critical to future deployment. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversitySpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2016Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1644&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 170 citations 170 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversitySpiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryArticle . 2016Data sources: Spiral - Imperial College Digital RepositoryBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2016 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1644&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 NetherlandsPublisher:Wiley de Jong, S.A.; Hoefnagels, E.T.A.; Faaij, André; Slade, Raphael; Mawhood, Rebecca; Junginger, H.M.;doi: 10.1002/bbb.1613
AbstractThis study compares the short‐term economic feasibility of six conversion pathways for renewable jet fuel (RJF) production. The assessment combines (i) a harmonized techno‐economic analysis of conversion pathways expected to be certified for use in commercial aviation by 2020, (ii) a pioneer plant analysis taking into account technological immaturity, and (iii) a quantified assessment of the merits of co‐producing RJF alongside existing European supply chains in the pulp, wheat ethanol, and beet sugar industries. None of the pathways assessed are able to reach price parity with petroleum‐derived jet fuel in the short term. The pioneer plant analysis suggests that the hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) pathway is currently the best option; the technology achieves the lowest minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of 29.3 € GJ−1 (1289 € t−1) and the technology is deployed on commercial scale already. In the short term, nth plant analysis shows hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and pyrolysis emerging as promising alternatives, yielding MFSPs of 21.4 € GJ−1 (939 € t−1) and 30.2 € GJ−1 (1326 € t−1), respectively. The pioneer plant analysis shows considerable MFSP increases for producing drop‐in fuels using HTL and pyrolysis as both technologies are relatively immature. Hence, further RD&D efforts into these pathways are recommended. Co‐production strategies decrease the MFSP by 4–8% compared to greenfield production. Integration of process units and material and energy flows is expected to lead to further cost reductions. As such, co‐production can be a particularly useful strategy to progress emerging technologies to commercial scale. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversityBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1613&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 226 citations 226 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversityBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1613&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2015 NetherlandsPublisher:Wiley de Jong, S.A.; Hoefnagels, E.T.A.; Faaij, André; Slade, Raphael; Mawhood, Rebecca; Junginger, H.M.;doi: 10.1002/bbb.1613
AbstractThis study compares the short‐term economic feasibility of six conversion pathways for renewable jet fuel (RJF) production. The assessment combines (i) a harmonized techno‐economic analysis of conversion pathways expected to be certified for use in commercial aviation by 2020, (ii) a pioneer plant analysis taking into account technological immaturity, and (iii) a quantified assessment of the merits of co‐producing RJF alongside existing European supply chains in the pulp, wheat ethanol, and beet sugar industries. None of the pathways assessed are able to reach price parity with petroleum‐derived jet fuel in the short term. The pioneer plant analysis suggests that the hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) pathway is currently the best option; the technology achieves the lowest minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of 29.3 € GJ−1 (1289 € t−1) and the technology is deployed on commercial scale already. In the short term, nth plant analysis shows hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and pyrolysis emerging as promising alternatives, yielding MFSPs of 21.4 € GJ−1 (939 € t−1) and 30.2 € GJ−1 (1326 € t−1), respectively. The pioneer plant analysis shows considerable MFSP increases for producing drop‐in fuels using HTL and pyrolysis as both technologies are relatively immature. Hence, further RD&D efforts into these pathways are recommended. Co‐production strategies decrease the MFSP by 4–8% compared to greenfield production. Integration of process units and material and energy flows is expected to lead to further cost reductions. As such, co‐production can be a particularly useful strategy to progress emerging technologies to commercial scale. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversityBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1613&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 226 citations 226 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Biofuels Bioproducts... arrow_drop_down Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015License: taverneData sources: Pure Utrecht UniversityBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningArticle . 2015 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Wiley Online Library User AgreementData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1002/bbb.1613&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2009Publisher:Elsevier BV Raphael Slade; Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal; Maria Edlund; Antoine Margeot; Frédéric Monot;pmid: 19502048
The use of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of biofuels will be unavoidable if liquid fossil fuels are to be replaced by renewable and sustainable alternatives. Ethanol accounts for the majority of biofuel use worldwide, and the prospect of its biological production from abundant lignocellulosic feedstocks is attractive. The recalcitrance of these raw materials still renders proposed processes complex and costly, but there are grounds for optimism. The application of new, engineered enzyme systems for cellulose hydrolysis, the construction of inhibitor-tolerant pentose-fermenting industrial yeast strains, combined with optimized process integration promise significant improvements. The opportunity to test these advances in pilot plants paves the way for large-scale units. This review summarizes recent progress in this field, including the validation at pilot scale, and the economic and environmental impacts of this production pathway.
Current Opinion in B... arrow_drop_down Current Opinion in BiotechnologyArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu323 citations 323 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Current Opinion in B... arrow_drop_down Current Opinion in BiotechnologyArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2009Publisher:Elsevier BV Raphael Slade; Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal; Maria Edlund; Antoine Margeot; Frédéric Monot;pmid: 19502048
The use of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of biofuels will be unavoidable if liquid fossil fuels are to be replaced by renewable and sustainable alternatives. Ethanol accounts for the majority of biofuel use worldwide, and the prospect of its biological production from abundant lignocellulosic feedstocks is attractive. The recalcitrance of these raw materials still renders proposed processes complex and costly, but there are grounds for optimism. The application of new, engineered enzyme systems for cellulose hydrolysis, the construction of inhibitor-tolerant pentose-fermenting industrial yeast strains, combined with optimized process integration promise significant improvements. The opportunity to test these advances in pilot plants paves the way for large-scale units. This review summarizes recent progress in this field, including the validation at pilot scale, and the economic and environmental impacts of this production pathway.
Current Opinion in B... arrow_drop_down Current Opinion in BiotechnologyArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu323 citations 323 popularity Top 1% influence Top 1% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Current Opinion in B... arrow_drop_down Current Opinion in BiotechnologyArticle . 2009 . Peer-reviewedLicense: Elsevier TDMData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.009&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object , Other literature type 2016Publisher:ETA-Florence Renewable Energies Authors: C. Jamieson; O. McLaughlin; Rebecca Mawhood; Raphael Slade;Globally, rice straw is the third largest agricultural residue, behind sugarcane bagasse and maize straw. Approximately one billion tonnes of rice straw are produced annually, but only a small proportion of this is used. The primary management strategies of rice straw farmers are burning in the fields and mulching. Burning produces harmful carcinogenic and greenhouse gas emissions and mulching releases high levels of methane which have an even greater greenhouse gas effect than the CO2 released from burning. In comparison, using rice straw for bioenergy has considerable advantages. This study examines the barriers to the use of rice straw for bioenergy, and the effectiveness of the existing policy mechanisms in seven major rice producing nations: Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Data on policy effectiveness was obtained from semi-structured interviews with experts on rice straw use, based at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) based in the Philippines. This was combined with a detailed evaluation of existing government policies and a ranking exercise to identify which policy aspects were considered most successful to prohibit burning and encourage bioenergy use. Barriers to the widespread use of rice straw which can be categorised into biochemical, logistical and infrastructural. The biochemical barriers include the low nutritive quality, high lignin and silica content which complicates the breaking down of rice straw into its useful components. The logistical barriers are the wide dispersal of rice straw and intra-annual fluctuations in availability and the resulting issues created in transporting the resource in sufficient quantity to where it can be utilised at the right time. The final group of barriers include the cultural practices of rice straw farmers, fossil fuel subsidies skewing the market and the support systems in place for conventional substitutes of rice straw products, such as the infrastructure in place to process and produce petroleum. Implementation is critical to policy success. Ineffective implementation was found to arise from a combination of factors including: institutional coordination issues, resource constraints, political interference, corruption and unintended consequences of policies. The interviews revealed that experts believed engaging with farmers in their rice straw management was the most important form of intervention a government could pursue. Every nation shows some evidence of attempting to engage farmers but efforts are sporadic and mainly left to agricultural extension workers to pursue. Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 6-9 June 2016, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 1540-1554
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5071/24theubce2016-4av.3.20&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5071/24theubce2016-4av.3.20&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object , Other literature type 2016Publisher:ETA-Florence Renewable Energies Authors: C. Jamieson; O. McLaughlin; Rebecca Mawhood; Raphael Slade;Globally, rice straw is the third largest agricultural residue, behind sugarcane bagasse and maize straw. Approximately one billion tonnes of rice straw are produced annually, but only a small proportion of this is used. The primary management strategies of rice straw farmers are burning in the fields and mulching. Burning produces harmful carcinogenic and greenhouse gas emissions and mulching releases high levels of methane which have an even greater greenhouse gas effect than the CO2 released from burning. In comparison, using rice straw for bioenergy has considerable advantages. This study examines the barriers to the use of rice straw for bioenergy, and the effectiveness of the existing policy mechanisms in seven major rice producing nations: Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Data on policy effectiveness was obtained from semi-structured interviews with experts on rice straw use, based at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) based in the Philippines. This was combined with a detailed evaluation of existing government policies and a ranking exercise to identify which policy aspects were considered most successful to prohibit burning and encourage bioenergy use. Barriers to the widespread use of rice straw which can be categorised into biochemical, logistical and infrastructural. The biochemical barriers include the low nutritive quality, high lignin and silica content which complicates the breaking down of rice straw into its useful components. The logistical barriers are the wide dispersal of rice straw and intra-annual fluctuations in availability and the resulting issues created in transporting the resource in sufficient quantity to where it can be utilised at the right time. The final group of barriers include the cultural practices of rice straw farmers, fossil fuel subsidies skewing the market and the support systems in place for conventional substitutes of rice straw products, such as the infrastructure in place to process and produce petroleum. Implementation is critical to policy success. Ineffective implementation was found to arise from a combination of factors including: institutional coordination issues, resource constraints, political interference, corruption and unintended consequences of policies. The interviews revealed that experts believed engaging with farmers in their rice straw management was the most important form of intervention a government could pursue. Every nation shows some evidence of attempting to engage farmers but efforts are sporadic and mainly left to agricultural extension workers to pursue. Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 6-9 June 2016, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 1540-1554
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5071/24theubce2016-4av.3.20&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.5071/24theubce2016-4av.3.20&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2008 ItalyPublisher:Elsevier BV Jablonski, S; Pantaleo, A; Bauen, A; Pearson, P; Panoutsou, C; Slade, R;handle: 11586/15879
How large is the potential demand for bio-heat in the UK? Whilst most research has focused on the supply of biomass for energy production, an understanding of the potential demand is crucial to the uptake of heat from bioenergy. We have designed a systematic framework utilising market segmentation techniques to assess the potential demand for biomass heat in the UK. First, the heat market is divided into relevant segments, characterised in terms of their final energy consumption, technological and fuel supply options. Second, the key technical, economic and organisational factors that affect the uptake of bioenergy in each heat segment are identified, classified and then analysed to reveal which could be strong barriers, which could be surmounted easily, and for which bioenergy heat represents an improvement compared to alternatives. The defined framework is applied to the UK residential sector. We identify provisionally the most promising market segments for bioenergy heat, and their current levels of energy demand. We find that, depending on the assumptions, the present potential demand for bio-heat in the UK residential sector ranges between 3% (conservative estimate) and 31% (optimistic estimate) of the total energy consumed in the heat market.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu22 citations 22 popularity Average influence Top 10% impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2008 ItalyPublisher:Elsevier BV Jablonski, S; Pantaleo, A; Bauen, A; Pearson, P; Panoutsou, C; Slade, R;handle: 11586/15879
How large is the potential demand for bio-heat in the UK? Whilst most research has focused on the supply of biomass for energy production, an understanding of the potential demand is crucial to the uptake of heat from bioenergy. We have designed a systematic framework utilising market segmentation techniques to assess the potential demand for biomass heat in the UK. First, the heat market is divided into relevant segments, characterised in terms of their final energy consumption, technological and fuel supply options. Second, the key technical, economic and organisational factors that affect the uptake of bioenergy in each heat segment are identified, classified and then analysed to reveal which could be strong barriers, which could be surmounted easily, and for which bioenergy heat represents an improvement compared to alternatives. The defined framework is applied to the UK residential sector. We identify provisionally the most promising market segments for bioenergy heat, and their current levels of energy demand. We find that, depending on the assumptions, the present potential demand for bio-heat in the UK residential sector ranges between 3% (conservative estimate) and 31% (optimistic estimate) of the total energy consumed in the heat market.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu22 citations 22 popularity Average influence Top 10% impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.013&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu