• Energy Research

The differential outcomes of social isolation and crowding environment on the effects of single or repeated administration of ethanol on open-field behavior were examined in female mice. Whereas housing conditions did not alter the increase in locomotor activity induced by ethanol single administration, behavioral sensitization (a progressive increase of a drug effect following repeated drug administration) to the locomotor activating effect of ethanol was significantly greater in crowded mice as compared to isolated and control groups. Single administration of ethanol significantly decreased rearing frequency and increased immobility duration, there being tolerance to these ethanol behavior effects after repeated treatment. Social isolation attenuated the increase in immobility behavior induced by single administration of ethanol and potentiated the tolerance of ethanol-induced rearing decrease, verified after repeated treatment. These results point out that both sensitization and tolerance to the behavioral effects of ethanol can be critically influenced by housing conditions.

Behavioral sensitization to the stimulating effect of ethanol (EtOH) or other drugs, which can be observed in mice as an increase in locomotor activity after repeated administration, has been associated with neuroadaptations within the dopaminergic mesolimbic pathway. In the nucleus accumbens (NAc), an afferent region of the mesolimbic pathway, dopamine (DA) release can be modulated by serotonergic 2C receptors (5-HT2CR). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the function of 5-HT2CR in the expression of EtOH-induced behavioral sensitization in Albino Swiss mice with various levels of sensitization to EtOH. In the four experiments that we performed, the mice were given saline or 2.2 g/kg EtOH daily for 21 days. Based on their locomotion on day 21, the EtOH-pretreated mice were assigned to one of two groups, highly sensitized or weakly sensitized to the stimulating effect of EtOH. In each experiment, 2 weeks after the 21-day treatment (withdrawal period), the mice were submitted to four pharmacological challenges of two drug treatments each. The mice in experiments 1 and 2 received two i.p. injections, whereas the mice in experiments 3 and 4 received an intra-NAc administration followed by an i.p. injection. The challenges were: saline+saline; saline+EtOH; SB-242084 (a 5-HT2CR antagonist; 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg i.p. or 1.0 or 2.0 μg/side intra-NAc)+EtOH; and SB-242084 (0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg i.p. or 1.0 or 2.0 μg/side intra-NAc)+saline. At all tested doses, i.p. administration of SB-242084 did not affect the stimulating effect of EtOH in the highly sensitized mice. However, when delivered by intra-NAc administration, SB-242084 reduced (at 1.0 μg/side) or completely blocked (at 2.0 μg/side) the expression of EtOH-induced behavioral sensitization in the highly sensitized mice. These findings suggest that the expression of behavioral sensitization to the stimulating effect of EtOH depends on accumbal 5-HT2CR activity.

We have used a genetical genomic approach, in conjunction with phenotypic analysis of alcohol consumption, to identify candidate genes that predispose to varying levels of alcohol intake by HXB/BXH recombinant inbred rat strains. In addition, in two populations of humans, we assessed genetic polymorphisms associated with alcohol consumption using a custom genotyping array for 1,350 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Our goal was to ascertain whether our approach, which relies on statistical and informatics techniques, and non-human animal models of alcohol drinking behavior, could inform interpretation of genetic association studies with human populations.In the HXB/BXH recombinant inbred (RI) rats, correlation analysis of brain gene expression levels with alcohol consumption in a two-bottle choice paradigm, and filtering based on behavioral and gene expression quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses, generated a list of candidate genes. A literature-based, functional analysis of the interactions of the products of these candidate genes defined pathways linked to presynaptic GABA release, activation of dopamine neurons, and postsynaptic GABA receptor trafficking, in brain regions including the hypothalamus, ventral tegmentum and amygdala. The analysis also implicated energy metabolism and caloric intake control as potential influences on alcohol consumption by the recombinant inbred rats. In the human populations, polymorphisms in genes associated with GABA synthesis and GABA receptors, as well as genes related to dopaminergic transmission, were associated with alcohol consumption.Our results emphasize the importance of the signaling pathways identified using the non-human animal models, rather than single gene products, in identifying factors responsible for complex traits such as alcohol consumption. The results suggest cross-species similarities in pathways that influence predisposition to consume alcohol by rats and humans. The importance of a well-defined phenotype is also illustrated. Our results also suggest that different genetic factors predispose alcohol dependence versus the phenotype of alcohol consumption.

Locomotor activity was recorded after 5-30 mg/kg of cocaine in mice pretreated or not with a stimulant dose of ethanol (2.0 g/kg). The increase in locomotion induced by the association of cocaine plus ethanol was significantly larger when compared to either the group injected with only cocaine or only ethanol.

In the present paper, two experiments are performed to test the efficacy of the intravenous administration of hypertonic glucose (25 or 50%) in alcoholic intoxication. In a first experiment, 10 healthy, nonstarved volunteers, received 15 min after the ingestion of 1.0 g/kg alcohol, 40 ml of 25% glucose i.v., the same volume of 0.9% NaCl or no injection. According to evaluations performed at several time intervals up to 2 h after alcohol ingestion, no difference among the 3 conditions was observed either in the intensity of alcohol intoxication or on blood alcohol levels. In a second experiment, blood glucose and alcohol levels were evaluated in 80 alcoholized patients in an emergency room. The mean glycemic value was 94 mg/100 ml. No difference was found by comparing this value with that presented by nonalcoholized patients. The 80 patients were distributed in two groups of 40 each: one of them was intravenously administered 40 ml of glucose 50% while the other was injected with saline. About 20-30 min later the patients of both groups were clinically evaluated by the physician on duty, being considered equally improved regardless of the injection. The self-evaluation by the patients provided similar results.

Accumulating evidence points to the mesolimbic and the nigrostriatal dopamine systems as critical to behavioral sensitization induced by several drugs of abuse. In the present study, we analyzed D1 and D2 binding to brain regions related to these dopaminergic systems during the expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization. The first experiment was performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the ethanol treatment schedule and challenge used to induce the expression of the behavioral sensitization phenomenon. The second experiment was conducted to study D1 and D2 alterations in several brain regions during the expression of this phenomenon. Mice were ip treated with ethanol or saline for 21 consecutive days and 24 h after the last injection they received an ethanol or a saline challenge injection. Five minutes later, the animals were observed in an open-field for locomotion quantification or were sacrificed and their brains were submitted to autoradiographic binding analyses. No differences among the groups were found for D1 binding levels in all the brain regions analyzed. However, ethanol-sensitized mice showed reduced levels of D2 binding in the olfactory tubercle when compared to the other groups. Our data suggest that D2 receptor changes in the olfactory tubercle seem to play an important role in the expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization.

Behavioral sensitization to ethanol is characterized by an increased locomotor activity after repeated exposure. A great variability exists among species and strains in the development of sensitization. There is a growing amount of evidence to indicate that the opioid system is involved in alcoholism; it is possible, therefore, that this system also modulates the sensitization to ethanol. In this study we evaluated the role of the opioid system in determining the variability of the sensitized response to ethanol. Mice received repeated administrations of ethanol (2.2 g/kg) or saline every other day for 10 days. According to their locomotor response on the last day of treatment, ethanol-treated animals were classified into two groups: sensitized or non-sensitized mice. After the treatment, mice were submitted to four challenges 48 h apart. In experiments 1 and 2, mice were challenged, respectively, with i.p. administration of opioid antagonists (naloxone or naltrexone) or an opioid agonist (morphine), followed immediately by 2.2 g/kg ethanol. In experiment 3, animals received morphine by i.c.v., followed by 2.2 g/kg of ethanol (i.p.). Pretreatment with opioid antagonists (naloxone or naltrexone) did not block the expression of ethanol sensitization; however pretreatment with morphine attenuated the increased locomotor activity after ethanol administration in sensitized mice. In experiment 4, after the ethanol or saline treatment, mice brains were processed and brain mu opioid binding was assessed by autoradiography using [3H]D-Ala2,N-mePhe4, Gly-ol5-enkephalin ([3H]DAMGO). No differences were seen between any of the groups of mice, so the agonist effect is not likely to be mediated by differences in binding to mu opioid receptors.

Background: There are popular reports on the combined use of alcohol and energy drinks (such as Red Bull® and similar beverages, which contain caffeine, taurine, carbohydrates, etc.) to reduce the depressant effects of alcohol on central nervous system, but no controlled studies have been performed. The main purpose of this study was to verify the effects of alcohol, and alcohol combined with energy drink, on the performance of volunteers in a maximal effort test (cycle ergometer) and also on physiological indicators (oxygen uptake, ventilatory threshold, respiratory exchange rate, heart rate, and blood pressure), biochemical variables (glucose, lactate, insulin, cortisol, ACTH, dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline), and blood alcohol levels.Methods: Fourteen healthy subjects completed a double‐blind protocol made up of four sessions: control (water), alcohol (1.0 g/kg), energy drink (3.57 ml/kg Red Bull®), and alcohol + energy drink, each 1 week apart. The effort test began 60 min after drug or control ingestion, and the dependent variables were measured until 60 min after the test.Results: Heart rate at the ventilatory threshold was higher in the alcohol and alcohol + energy drink sessions in comparison with control and energy drink sessions. Although in comparison to the control session, the peak oxygen uptake was 5.0% smaller after alcohol ingestion, 1.4% smaller after energy drink, and 2.7% smaller after the combined ingestion, no significant differences were detected. Lactate levels (30 min after drug ingestion, 30 and 60 min after the effort test) and noradrenaline levels (30 min after the effort test) were higher in the alcohol and alcohol + energy drink sessions compared with the control session.Conclusions: The performance in the maximal effort test observed after alcohol + energy drink ingestion was similar to that observed after alcohol only. No significant differences between alcohol and alcohol + energy drink were detected in the physiological and biochemical parameters analyzed. Our findings suggest that energy drinks, at least in the tested doses, did not improve performance or reduce alterations induced by acute alcohol ingestion.