• Energy Research

We compare stochastic programming and robust optimization decision models for informing the deployment of ad hoc flood mitigation measures to protect electrical substations prior to an imminent and uncertain hurricane. In our models, the first stage captures the deployment of a fixed quantity of flood mitigation resources, and the second stage captures the operation of a potentially degraded power grid with the primary goal of minimizing load shed. To model grid operation, we introduce adaptations of the direct current (DC) and linear programming alternating current (LPAC) power flow approximation models that feature relatively complete recourse by way of an indicator variable. We apply our models to a pair of geographically realistic flooding case studies, one based on Hurricane Harvey and the other on Tropical Storm Imelda. We investigate the effect of the mitigation budget, the choice of power flow model, and the uncertainty perspective on the optimal mitigation strategy. Our results indicate the mitigation budget and uncertainty perspective are impactful, whereas choosing between the DC and LPAC power flow models is of little to no consequence. To validate our models, we assess the performance of the mitigation solutions they prescribe in an alternating current (AC) power flow model. History: Accepted by Pascal Van Hentenryck, Area Editor for Computational Modeling: Methods & Analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Energy Institute, The University of Texas at Austin. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0125 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2023.0125 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ .

We present a stochastic programming model for informing the deployment of ad hoc flood mitigation measures to protect electrical substations prior to an imminent and uncertain hurricane. The first stage captures the deployment of a fixed number of mitigation resources, and the second stage captures grid operation in response to a contingency. The primary objective is to minimize expected load shed. We develop methods for simulating flooding induced by extreme rainfall and construct two geographically realistic case studies, one based on Tropical Storm Imelda and the other on Hurricane Harvey. Applying our model to those case studies, we investigate the effect of the mitigation budget on the optimal objective value and solutions. Our results highlight the sensitivity of the optimal mitigation to the budget, a consequence of those decisions being discrete. We additionally assess the value of having better mitigation options and the spatial features of the optimal mitigation. 37 pages, 13 figures

We propose a three-stage stochastic programming model to inform risk-averse investment in power system resilience to winter storms. The first stage pertains to long-term investment in generator winterization and mobile battery energy storage system (MBESS) resources, the second stage to MBESS deployment prior to an imminent storm, and the third stage to operational response. Serving as a forecast update, an imminent winter storm’s severity is assumed to be known at the time the deployment decisions are made. We incorporate conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) as the risk measure in the objective function to target loss, represented in our model by unserved energy, experienced during high-impact, low-frequency events. We apply the model to a Texas-focused case study based on the ACTIVS 2000-bus synthetic grid with winter storm scenarios generated using historical Winter Storm Uri data. Results demonstrate how the optimal investments are affected by parameters like cost and risk aversion, and also how effectively using CVaR as a risk measure mitigates the outcomes in the tail of the loss distribution over the winter storm impact uncertainty.