• Energy Research

This study introduces a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model, effectively co-optimizing patrolling, damage assessment, fault isolation, repair, and load re-energization processes. The model is designed to solve a vital operational conundrum: deciding between further network exploration to obtain more comprehensive data or addressing the repair of already identified faults. As information on the fault location and repair timelines becomes available, the model allows for dynamic adaptation of crew dispatch decisions. In addition, this study proposes a conservative power flow constraint set that considers two network loading scenarios within the final network configuration. This approach results in the determination of an upper and a lower bound for node voltage levels and an upper bound for power line flows. To underscore the practicality and scalability of the proposed model, we have demonstrated its application using IEEE 123-node and 8500-node test systems, where it delivered promising results.

This study introduces a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model, effectively co-optimizing patrolling, damage assessment, fault isolation, repair, and load re-energization processes. The model is designed to solve a vital operational conundrum: deciding between further network exploration to obtain more comprehensive data or addressing the repair of already identified faults. As information on the fault location and repair timelines becomes available, the model allows for dynamic adaptation of crew dispatch decisions. In addition, this study proposes a conservative power flow constraint set that considers two network loading scenarios within the final network configuration. This approach results in the determination of an upper and a lower bound for node voltage levels and an upper bound for power line flows. To underscore the practicality and scalability of the proposed model, we have demonstrated its application using IEEE 123-node and 8500-node test systems, where it delivered promising results.

Many power system operation and planning problems use the DC power flow approximation to address computational challenges from the nonlinearity of the AC power flow equations. The DC power flow simplifies the AC power flow equations to a linear form that relates active power flows to phase angle differences across branches, parameterized by coefficients based on the branches' susceptances. Inspired by techniques for training machine learning models, this paper proposes an algorithm that seeks optimal coefficient and bias parameters to improve the DC power flow approximation's accuracy. Specifically, the proposed algorithm selects the coefficient and bias parameter values that minimize the discrepancy, across a specified set of operational scenarios, between the power flows given by the DC approximation and the power flows from the AC equations. Gradient-based optimization methods like Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS), Limited-Memory BFGS (L-BFGS), and Truncated Newton Conjugate-Gradient (TNC) enable solution of the proposed algorithm for large systems. After an off-line training phase, the optimized parameters are used to improve the accuracy of the DC power flow during on-line computations. Numerical results show several orders of magnitude improvements in accuracy relative to a hot-start DC power flow approximation across a range of test cases.

Many power system operation and planning problems use the DC power flow approximation to address computational challenges from the nonlinearity of the AC power flow equations. The DC power flow simplifies the AC power flow equations to a linear form that relates active power flows to phase angle differences across branches, parameterized by coefficients based on the branches' susceptances. Inspired by techniques for training machine learning models, this paper proposes an algorithm that seeks optimal coefficient and bias parameters to improve the DC power flow approximation's accuracy. Specifically, the proposed algorithm selects the coefficient and bias parameter values that minimize the discrepancy, across a specified set of operational scenarios, between the power flows given by the DC approximation and the power flows from the AC equations. Gradient-based optimization methods like Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS), Limited-Memory BFGS (L-BFGS), and Truncated Newton Conjugate-Gradient (TNC) enable solution of the proposed algorithm for large systems. After an off-line training phase, the optimized parameters are used to improve the accuracy of the DC power flow during on-line computations. Numerical results show several orders of magnitude improvements in accuracy relative to a hot-start DC power flow approximation across a range of test cases.

This paper presents an algorithm for restoring AC power flow feasibility from solutions to simplified optimal power flow (OPF) problems, including convex relaxations, power flow approximations, and machine learning (ML) models. The proposed algorithm employs a state estimation-based post-processing technique in which voltage phasors, power injections, and line flows from solutions to relaxed, approximated, or ML-based OPF problems are treated similarly to noisy measurements in a state estimation algorithm. The algorithm leverages information from various quantities to obtain feasible voltage phasors and power injections that satisfy the AC power flow equations. Weight and bias parameters are computed offline using an adaptive stochastic gradient descent method. By automatically learning the trustworthiness of various outputs from simplified OPF problems, these parameters inform the online computations of the state estimation-based algorithm to both recover feasible solutions and characterize the performance of power flow approximations, relaxations, and ML models. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm can simultaneously utilize combined solutions from different relaxations, approximations, and ML models to enhance performance. Case studies demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed algorithm, with solutions that are both AC power flow feasible and much closer to the true AC OPF solutions than alternative methods, often by several orders of magnitude in the squared two-norm loss function.

This paper presents an algorithm for restoring AC power flow feasibility from solutions to simplified optimal power flow (OPF) problems, including convex relaxations, power flow approximations, and machine learning (ML) models. The proposed algorithm employs a state estimation-based post-processing technique in which voltage phasors, power injections, and line flows from solutions to relaxed, approximated, or ML-based OPF problems are treated similarly to noisy measurements in a state estimation algorithm. The algorithm leverages information from various quantities to obtain feasible voltage phasors and power injections that satisfy the AC power flow equations. Weight and bias parameters are computed offline using an adaptive stochastic gradient descent method. By automatically learning the trustworthiness of various outputs from simplified OPF problems, these parameters inform the online computations of the state estimation-based algorithm to both recover feasible solutions and characterize the performance of power flow approximations, relaxations, and ML models. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm can simultaneously utilize combined solutions from different relaxations, approximations, and ML models to enhance performance. Case studies demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed algorithm, with solutions that are both AC power flow feasible and much closer to the true AC OPF solutions than alternative methods, often by several orders of magnitude in the squared two-norm loss function.

Recently, resilience studies have become an indispensable tool for sustainable operation of energy infrastructure. In line with the need, this study presents a mathematical model to enhance resilience level of power distribution systems against natural disasters. The model is designed as a three‐stage algorithm according to system operators’ actions. The first stage schedules pre‐event actions. At this stage, forecasts about the approaching disaster as well as fragility curves of system components are used to identify failure probability of system components. The failure probabilities are used to trip out the lines as much as possible to defensively operate the distribution network, and advantages of alternatives such as distributed energy resources and normally‐open switches are taken to serve critical loads. The second stage is to monitor system operating conditions during the event and identify the status of system components. The third stage mainly focuses on scheduling post‐event actions. At this stage, based on real data about different elements of the network, available alternatives are taken to restore as much critical load as possible. To evaluate performance of the model, it is applied to a distribution test system and the results are discussed in detail.

Recently, resilience studies have become an indispensable tool for sustainable operation of energy infrastructure. In line with the need, this study presents a mathematical model to enhance resilience level of power distribution systems against natural disasters. The model is designed as a three‐stage algorithm according to system operators’ actions. The first stage schedules pre‐event actions. At this stage, forecasts about the approaching disaster as well as fragility curves of system components are used to identify failure probability of system components. The failure probabilities are used to trip out the lines as much as possible to defensively operate the distribution network, and advantages of alternatives such as distributed energy resources and normally‐open switches are taken to serve critical loads. The second stage is to monitor system operating conditions during the event and identify the status of system components. The third stage mainly focuses on scheduling post‐event actions. At this stage, based on real data about different elements of the network, available alternatives are taken to restore as much critical load as possible. To evaluate performance of the model, it is applied to a distribution test system and the results are discussed in detail.