- home
- Advanced Search
Filters
- Energy Research
- Energy Research
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 BrazilPublisher:Elsevier BV Abmael S. Cardoso; Alexandre Berndt; April Leytem; Bruno J.R. Alves; Isabel das N.O. de Carvalho; Luis Henrique de Barros Soares; Segundo Urquiaga; Robert M. Boddey;handle: 11449/172348
Brazil has the largest herd of beef cattle in the world, estimated at approximately 200 million animals. Production is predominantly pasture-based and low input and hence time to slaughter is long, which promotes high methane (CH4) emissions per kg of product. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of increasing animal productivity using fertilizers, forage legumes, supplements and concentrates, on the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in five scenarios for beef production in Brazil. A life cycle analysis (LCA) approach, from birth of calves to mature animals ready for slaughter at the farm gate, was utilized using Tier 2 methodologies of the IPCC and the results expressed in equivalents of carbon dioxide (CO2eq) per kg of carcass produced. Fossil CO2 emitted in the production of supplements, feeds and fertilizers was included using standard LCA techniques. The first four scenarios were based solely on cattle production on pasture, ranging from degraded Brachiaria pastures, through to a mixed legume/Brachiaria pasture and improved N-fertilized pastures of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum). Scenario 5 was the most intensive and was also based on an N-fertilized Guinea grass pasture, but with a 75-day finishing period in confinement with total mixed ration (TMR). Across the scenarios from 1 to 5 the increase in digestibility promoted a reduction in the forage intake per unit of animal weight gain and a concomitant reduction in CH4 emissions. For the estimation of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from animal excreta, emission factors from a study in the Cerrado region were utilized which postulated lower emission from dung than from urine and much lower emissions in the long dry season in this region. The greatest impact of intensification of the beef production systems was a 7-fold reduction of the area necessary for production from 320 to 45 m2/kg carcass. Carcass production increased from 43 to 65 Mg per herd across the scenarios from 1 to 5, and total emissions per kg carcass were estimated to be reduced from 58.3 to 29.4 kg CO2eq/kg carcass. Even though animal weight gain was lower in the mixed grass-legume scenario (3) than for the N-fertilized Guinea grass pastures (scenarios 4 and 5) GHG emissions per kg carcass were similar as the legume N2 fixation input had no fossil-fuel cost. A large source of uncertainty for the construction of such LCAs was the lack of data for enteric CH4 emissions from cattle grazing tropical forages.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 162 citations 162 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Althieres José Furtado; Adibe Luiz Abdalla Filho; Jaqueline Fernandes Bruno; Rolando Pasquini Neto; +9 AuthorsAlthieres José Furtado; Adibe Luiz Abdalla Filho; Jaqueline Fernandes Bruno; Rolando Pasquini Neto; Annelise Aila Gomes Lobo; Gabriele Voltareli da Silva; Flavio Perna Junior; Teresa Cristina Alves; Alexandre Berndt; André de Faria Pedroso; Sérgio Raposo de Medeiros; Patrícia Perondi Anchão Oliveira; Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues;In this study, we evaluate the effects of intercropping pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) with tropical pastures for feeding Nellore cattle and compared animal performance and enteric CH4 emissions with other pasture-based systems during the dry and rainy seasons of 2021. Thirty-six Nellore steers (with a body weight of 221 ± 7 kg and an age of 15–16 months) were randomly distributed in three treatments with three replicates (in paddocks of 1.5 hectares each): (1) a degraded pasture of Urochloa spp. (DEG); (2) a recovered and fertilized pasture of Urochloa spp. (REC); and (3) pigeon pea intercropped with Urochloa spp. (MIX). Enteric CH4 emissions were estimated using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas technique, and dry matter intake (DMI) was determined using internal (iNDF) and external (TiO2) markers. Forages were collected by hand plucking after observations of ingestive behavior, and feces was collected after voluntary defecation. The proportion of grass and legume intake was estimated by C stable isotopes, and the forage nutritional quality was determined, while animal performance was monitored monthly, and the stocking rate was adjusted by the “put and take” technique. The results indicated that intercropping pigeon pea with tropical grasses is an interesting strategy for sustainable livestock production based on pastures. The MIX treatment was able to meet the nutritional requirements of the animals, which presented higher performance. In addition, there was a reduction in CH4 emissions up to 70% when expressed per average daily weight gain in comparison to the DEG treatment.
Animals arrow_drop_down AnimalsOther literature type . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/8/1323/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/ani13081323&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 9 citations 9 popularity Average influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Animals arrow_drop_down AnimalsOther literature type . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/8/1323/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/ani13081323&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020Publisher:Elsevier BV P.P.A. Oliveira; A. Berndt; A.F. Pedroso; T.C. Alves; J.R.M. Pezzopane; L.S. Sakamoto; F.L. Henrique; P.H.M. Rodrigues;pmid: 32829724
The production of beef cattle in the Atlantic Forest biome mostly takes place in pastoral production systems. There are millions of hectares covered with pastures in this biome, including degraded pasture (DP), and only small area of the original Atlantic Forest has been preserved in tropics, implying that actions must be taken by the livestock sector to improve sustainability. Intensification makes it possible to produce the same amount, or more beef, in a smaller area; however, the environmental impacts must be assessed. Regarding climate change, the C dynamics is essential to define which beef cattle systems are sustainable. The objectives of this study were to investigate the C balance (t CO2e./ha per year), the intensity of C emission (kg CO2e./kg BW or carcass) and the C footprint (t CO2e./ha per year) of pasture-based beef cattle production systems, inside the farm gate and considering the inputs. The results were used to calculate the number of trees to be planted in beef cattle production systems to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The GHG emission and C balance, for 2 years, were calculated based on the global warming potential (GWP) of AR4 and GWP of AR5. Forty-eight steers were allotted to four grazing systems: DP, irrigated high stocking rate pasture (IHS), rainfed high stocking rate pasture (RHS) and rainfed medium stocking rate pasture (RMS). The rainfed systems (RHS and RMS) presented the lowest C footprints (-1.22 and 0.45 t CO2e./ha per year, respectively), with C credits to RMS when using the GWP of AR4. The IHS system showed less favorable results for C footprint (-15.71 t CO2e./ha per year), but results were better when emissions were expressed in relation to the annual BW gain (-10.21 kg CO2e./kg BW) because of its higher yield. Although the DP system had an intermediate result for C footprint (-6.23 t CO2e./ha per year), the result was the worst (-30.21 CO2e./kg BW) when the index was expressed in relation to the annual BW gain, because in addition to GHG emissions from the animals in the system there were also losses in the annual rate of C sequestration. Notably, the intensification in pasture management had a land-saving effect (3.63 ha for IHS, 1.90 for RHS and 1.19 for RMS), contributing to the preservation of the tropical forest.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1017/s1751731120001822&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 26 citations 26 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1017/s1751731120001822&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2021 France, France, Netherlands, BrazilPublisher:Elsevier BV Authors: María Fernanda Vázquez-Carrillo; Ricardo Andrade Reis; José Gere; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; +75 AuthorsMaría Fernanda Vázquez-Carrillo; Ricardo Andrade Reis; José Gere; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; Telma Teresinha Berchielli; L. S. Sakamoto; Claudia Janeth Ariza-Nieto; Ana Cláudia Ruggieri; Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio; Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio; Xiomara Gaviria-Uribe; Xiomara Gaviria-Uribe; Fábio Luis Henrique; María Paula Juliarena; Tainá Silvestre Moreira; Sandra Lucía Posada-Ochoa; Marcos Inácio Marcondes; Jusiane Rossetto; Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero; Sergio Abarca-Monge; Roberto Soto-Blanco; João Paulo Pacheco Rodrigues; Carlos Alfredo Gómez-Bravo; F.A.S. Silva; Laura Bibiana Gualdrón-Duarte; Mohammed Benaouda; Rolando Barahona-Rosales; Luiza Ilha Borges; Abmael da Silva Cardoso; Lorena Inés Mestra-Vargas; Medardo Antonio Díaz Céspedes; André Bannink; André Bannink; Ana Luiza Costa Cruz Borges; Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho; Luis Alfonso Giraldo Valderrama; M. B. Chiavegato; Andrea Milena Sierra-Alarcón; Mariana Magalhães Campos; Flávio Perna Júnior; Ever del Jesus Flores-Santiago; Ever del Jesus Flores-Santiago; Jacobo Arango; Octavio Alonso Castelán-Ortega; María Paz Tieri; Ricardo Reis e Silva; Sebastiao de Campos Valadares-Filho; Banira Lombardi; Olegario Hernández; Patrícia Perondi Anchão Oliveira; Alda Lúcia Gomes Monteiro; Fernanda Samarini Machado; Luiz Gustavo Ribeiro Pereira; Jaime Ricardo Rosero-Noguera; Juan Carlos Ku-Vera; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Jean Victor Savian; Adibe Luiz Abdalla; María Esperanza Cerón-Cucchi; Camila Muñoz; Juliana Duarte Messana; Gustavo Jaurena; Laura Astigarraga; Abimael Ortiz-Chura; Horacio Leandro Gonda; Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo; Patricia Ricci; Thierry Ribeiro Tomich; Sila Carneiro da Silva; Víctor Ilich Alvarado Bolovich; Rogério Martins Maurício; Henrique Mendonça Nunes Ribeiro-Filho; Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues; Olga Lucía Mayorga Mogollón; Adibe Luiz Abdalla-Filho; Alexandre Berndt; Alexander N. Hristov; Diego Zanetti; Helena Ferreira Lage;handle: 11449/207853 , 10568/114504
Abstract Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security, producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region's ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier's removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk yield (MY; dairy cattle) or average daily gain (ADG; beef cattle and sheep). The breed composition F1 Holstein × Gyr decreased CH4 emission per MY (CH4IMilk) while increasing MY by 99%. Adequate strategies of grazing management under continuous and rotational stocking decreased CH4 emission per ADG (CH4IGain) by 22 and 35%, while increasing ADG by 22 and 71%, respectively. Increased dietary protein concentration, and increased concentrate level through cottonseed meal inclusion, decreased CH4IMilk and CH4IGain by 10 and 20% and increased MY and ADG by 12 and 31%, respectively. Lastly, increased feeding level decreased CH4IGain by 37%, while increasing ADG by 171%. The identified effective mitigation strategies can be adopted by livestock producers according to their specific needs and aid LAC countries in achieving SDG as defined in the Paris Agreement.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114504Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Cleaner ProductionArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefWageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversidade Estadual Paulista São Paulo: Repositório Institucional UNESPArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 64 citations 64 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114504Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Cleaner ProductionArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefWageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversidade Estadual Paulista São Paulo: Repositório Institucional UNESPArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2021 United Kingdom, United Kingdom, FrancePublisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Publicly fundedFunded by:UKRI | S2N - Soil to Nutrition -..., UKRI | RootDetect: Remote Detect...UKRI| S2N - Soil to Nutrition - Work package 2 (WP2) - Adaptive management systems for improved efficiency and nutritional quality ,UKRI| RootDetect: Remote Detection and Precision Management of Root HealthM. J. Rivero; Graeme Martin; P. Rovira; Tommy M. Boland; D. Enriquez-Hidalgo; D. Enriquez-Hidalgo; Paul N. C. Murphy; Paul Harris; F. Pereyra; Walter Ayala; A. Berndt; Mark C Eisler; Helen Sheridan; David R. Chadwick; Randall D. Jackson; D. Busch; C. Mignolet; P. T. Suraj; Gregg R. Sanford; N. Lopez-Villalobos; Thomas Puech; A. Cartmill; David I. McCracken; Alexander C.O. Evans; A.P. Williams; Michael R. F. Lee; A. Dowsey; Iain A. Wright; A. Farruggia; L. Brunet; R. Machado;pmid: 34676139
pmc: PMC8527498
Implications • La plateforme agricole mondiale a été conçue et mise en place pour explorer des stratégies multidisciplinaires pour optimiser la durabilité des systèmes de ruminants dans le monde. • Les problèmes de durabilité internationale sont courants, mais les solutions sont souvent spécifiques à la région ; par conséquent, notre les fermes, situées dans toutes les principales zones agroclimatiques, sont une ressource unique au monde. • Chaque exploitation suit les étapes de l'élevage durable pour améliorer son (ses) système(s) de production, développer des mesures robustes pour faire progresser la viabilité économique, environnementale et sociale. • Le consortium travaille en collaboration pour améliorer la la durabilité des ruminants, que nous considérons comme une composante des systèmes alimentaires mondiaux, fournissant à la fois santé humaine et planétaire. Implicaciones • La Plataforma Global Farm fue concebida y establecida para explorar estrategias multidisciplinarias para optimizar la sostenibilidad de los sistemas de rumiantes en todo el mundo. • Los problemas internacionales de sostenibilidad son comunes, pero las soluciones a menudo son específicas de la región; por lo tanto, nuestro granjas, situadas en todas las principales zonas agroclimáticas, son un recurso único en todo el mundo. • Cada granja está siguiendo los pasos para la ganadería sostenible para mejorar su (s) sistema(s) de producción, por lo tanto desarrollar métricas sólidas para avanzar en la viabilidad económica, ambiental y social. • El consorcio trabaja en colaboración para mejorar la sostenibilidad de los rumiantes, que argumentamos que son una componente de los sistemas alimentarios globales, entregando tanto salud humana y planetaria. Implications • The Global Farm Platform was conceived and established to explore multidisciplinary strategies for optimising the sustainability of ruminant systems around the world. • International sustainability issues are common, but the solutions are often region-specific; therefore, our farms, situated across all major agroclimatic zones, are a unique resource worldwide. • Each farm is following steps to sustainable livestock to improve their production system(s), thereby developing robust metrics to progress economic, environmental and social viability. • The consortium works collaboratively to improve the sustainability of ruminants, which we argue are a vital component of global food systems, delivering both human and planetary health. الآثار المترتبة • تم تصميم وإنشاء المنصة العالمية للمزارع لاستكشاف استراتيجيات متعددة التخصصات تحسين استدامة أنظمة الحيوانات المجترة في جميع أنحاء العالم. • قضايا الاستدامة الدولية شائعة، ولكن غالبًا ما تكون الحلول خاصة بالمنطقة ؛ لذلك، المزارع، التي تقع في جميع المناطق الزراعية المناخية الرئيسية، هي مورد فريد من نوعه في جميع أنحاء العالم. • تتبع كل مزرعة خطوات نحو الثروة الحيوانية المستدامة لتحسين نظام(أنظمة) الإنتاج الخاصة بها، وبالتالي تطوير مقاييس قوية للتقدم في الجدوى الاقتصادية والبيئية والاجتماعية. • يعمل الكونسورتيوم بشكل تعاوني لتحسين استدامة الحيوانات المجترة، والتي نعتبرها حيوية في النظم الغذائية العالمية، وتقديم كل من صحة الإنسان والكوكب.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115719Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/af/vfab048&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 13 citations 13 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115719Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/af/vfab048&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018Publisher:Universidade Estadual de Maringa Authors: Tatiana Lucila Pires Sobrinho; Renata Helena Branco; Elaine Magnani; Alexandre Berndt; +2 AuthorsTatiana Lucila Pires Sobrinho; Renata Helena Branco; Elaine Magnani; Alexandre Berndt; Roberta Carrilho Canesin; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante;LAReferencia - Red F... arrow_drop_down LAReferencia - Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas LatinoamericanasArticle . 2018License: CC BYActa Scientiarum: Animal SciencesArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.42559&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert LAReferencia - Red F... arrow_drop_down LAReferencia - Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas LatinoamericanasArticle . 2018License: CC BYActa Scientiarum: Animal SciencesArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.42559&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2013Publisher:Elsevier BV Authors: N. W. Tomkins; Alexandre Berndt;pmid: 23739477
The growing global demand for food of animal origin will be the incentive for countries such as Australia and Brazil to increase their beef production and international exports. This increased supply of beef is expected to occur primarily through on-farm productivity increases. The strategies for reducing resultant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions should be evaluated in the context of the production system and should encompass a broader analysis, which would include the emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon sequestration. This paper provides an insight into CH4 measurement techniques applicable to grazing environments and proposed mitigation strategies, with relevance to the production systems that are predominant in grazing systems of Australia and Brazil. Research and technology investment in both Australia and Brazil is aimed at developing measurement techniques and increasing the efficiency of cattle production by improving herd genetics, utilization of the seasonal feed-base and reducing the proportion of metabolizable energy lost as CH4. Concerted efforts in these areas can be expected to reduce the number of unproductive animals, reduce age at slaughter and inevitably reduce emission intensity (EI) from beef production systems. Improving efficiency of livestock production systems in tropical grazing systems for Australia and Brazil will be based on cultivated and existing native pastures and the use of additives and by-products from other agricultural sectors. This approach spares grain-based feed reserves typically used for human consumption, but potentially incurs a heavier EI than current intensive feeding systems. The determination of GHG emissions and the value of mitigation outcomes for entire beef production systems in the extensive grazing systems is complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. It is fortunate that governments in both Australia and Brazil are supporting ongoing research activities. Nevertheless, to achieve an outcome that feeds a growing population while reducing emissions on a global scale continues to be a monumental challenge for ruminant nutritionists.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1017/s1751731113000670&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 50 citations 50 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1017/s1751731113000670&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2002Publisher:FapUNIFESP (SciELO) Authors: Berndt, Alexandre; Henrique, Wignez; Leme, Paulo Roberto; Alleoni, Guilherme Fernando; +1 AuthorsBerndt, Alexandre; Henrique, Wignez; Leme, Paulo Roberto; Alleoni, Guilherme Fernando; Lanna, Dante Pazzanese Duarte;Foram utilizados 32 tourinhos Santa Gertrudis inicialmente com dez meses de idade e 245 kg de peso, alimentados em confinamento com dietas contendo 88% de concentrado. Quatro animais foram abatidos no início do experimento (linha base) para estimativa da composição corporal inicial. Os 28 animais restantes foram distribuídos em baias individuais com delineamento de blocos ao acaso em arranjo fatorial 2x2 (dois volumosos x dois processamentos do milho grão) com sete repetições. Os volumosos incluíam silagem da planta de milho ou bagaço de cana-de-açúcar e os dois processamentos do grão de milho, o grão colhido seco e triturado e o colhido e ensilado úmido. Estimou-se, por intermédio da regressão do logaritmo do conteúdo corporal de energia, em função do logaritmo do peso do corpo vazio, o conteúdo de energia e proteína para ganho de peso em qualquer faixa de peso vazio incluída neste trabalho: para ganho de 1 kg, em um animal de 300 kg, foram necessárias 3,64 Mcal/dia de energia e 129,5 g de proteína.
Revista Brasileira d... arrow_drop_down Scientific Electronic Library Online - BrazilArticle . 2002License: CC BY NCData sources: Scientific Electronic Library Online - Braziladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1590/s1516-35982002000800025&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Revista Brasileira d... arrow_drop_down Scientific Electronic Library Online - BrazilArticle . 2002License: CC BY NCData sources: Scientific Electronic Library Online - Braziladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1590/s1516-35982002000800025&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2022 France, Ireland, FrancePublisher:American Dairy Science Association Publicly fundedK. A. Beauchemin; Emilio M. Ungerfeld; Adibe Luiz Abdalla; Clementina Álvarez; Claudia Arndt; Philippe Becquet; C. Benchaar; A. Berndt; Rogério Martins Maurício; Tim A. McAllister; Walter Oyhantçabal; Saheed A. Salami; L. Shalloo; Yan Sun; J.M. Tricárico; Aimable Uwizeye; Camillo De Camillis; Martial Bernoux; Timothy P. Robinson; E. Kebreab;pmid: 36270879
handle: 11019/3342 , 10568/125142
Le bétail ruminant est une source importante de méthane anthropique (CH4). La diminution des émissions de CH4 entérique provenant de la production de ruminants est stratégique pour limiter l'augmentation de la température mondiale à 1,5 °C d'ici 2050. La recherche dans le domaine de l'atténuation du CH4 entérique a connu une croissance exponentielle au cours des deux dernières décennies, diverses stratégies de réduction du CH4 entérique étant à l'étude : intensification de la production, manipulation alimentaire (y compris la supplémentation et le traitement des concentrés et des lipides, et la gestion du fourrage et des pâturages), manipulation du rumen (supplémentation en ionophores, 3-nitrooxypropanol, macroalgues, accepteurs d'électrons alternatifs et phytochimiques) et sélection d'animaux à faible teneur en CH4. D'autres stratégies d'atténuation du CH4 entérique en sont aux premiers stades de la recherche, mais se développent rapidement. Ici, nous discutons et analysons l'état actuel des stratégies d'atténuation du CH4 entérique disponibles en mettant l'accent sur les opportunités et les obstacles à leur mise en œuvre dans les systèmes de production de pâturage confinés et partiels, et dans les systèmes de production de pâturage étendus et complets. Pour chaque stratégie d'atténuation du CH4 entérique, nous discutons de son efficacité à réduire les émissions totales de CH4 et les émissions par produit animal, des problèmes de sécurité, des impacts sur les émissions d'autres gaz à effet de serre, ainsi que d'autres aspects économiques, réglementaires et sociétaux qui sont essentiels à la mise en œuvre. La plupart des recherches ont été menées avec des animaux confinés, et beaucoup plus de recherches sont nécessaires pour développer, adapter et évaluer des stratégies antiméthanogènes pour les systèmes de pâturage. En général, peu d'options sont actuellement disponibles pour les systèmes de production extensifs sans supplémentation alimentaire. La recherche et le développement continus sont nécessaires pour développer des stratégies d'atténuation du CH4 entérique qui sont applicables localement. Des informations sont nécessaires pour calculer l'empreinte carbone des interventions sur une base régionale afin d'évaluer l'impact des stratégies d'atténuation sur les émissions nettes de gaz à effet de serre. Des solutions d'atténuation du CH4 entérique économiquement abordables sont nécessaires de toute urgence. La mise en œuvre réussie de stratégies antiméthanogènes sûres et efficaces nécessitera également des mécanismes de livraison et un soutien technique adéquat pour les producteurs, ainsi que la participation et l'acceptation des consommateurs. Les paramètres les plus appropriés doivent être utilisés pour quantifier les résultats climatiques globaux associés à l'atténuation des émissions entériques de CH4. Une approche holistique est nécessaire, et l'adhésion est nécessaire à tous les niveaux de la chaîne d'approvisionnement. El ganado rumiante es una fuente importante de metano antropogénico (CH4). Disminuir las emisiones de CH4 entérico de la producción de rumiantes es estratégico para limitar el aumento de la temperatura global a 1,5 °C para 2050. La investigación en el área de la mitigación entérica de CH4 ha crecido exponencialmente en las últimas 2 décadas, y se están investigando diversas estrategias para la reducción entérica de CH4: intensificación de la producción, manipulación dietética (incluida la suplementación y el procesamiento de concentrados y lípidos, y el manejo de forrajes y pastos), manipulación del rumen (suplementación de ionóforos, 3-nitrooxipropanol, macroalgas, aceptores de electrones alternativos y fitoquímicos) y selección de animales con baja producción de CH4. Otras estrategias entéricas de mitigación de CH4 se encuentran en etapas más tempranas de investigación, pero se están desarrollando rápidamente. En este documento, discutimos y analizamos el estado actual de las estrategias de mitigación entérica de CH4 disponibles con énfasis en las oportunidades y barreras para su implementación en sistemas de producción de pastoreo confinado y parcial, y en sistemas de producción extensiva y de pastoreo completo. Para cada estrategia entérica de mitigación de CH4, discutimos su efectividad para disminuir las emisiones totales de CH4 y las emisiones por producto animal, los problemas de seguridad, los impactos en las emisiones de otros gases de efecto invernadero, así como otros aspectos económicos, regulatorios y sociales que son clave para la implementación. La mayoría de las investigaciones se han realizado con animales confinados, y se necesita mucha más investigación para desarrollar, adaptar y evaluar estrategias antimetanogénicas para los sistemas de pastoreo. En general, actualmente hay pocas opciones disponibles para sistemas de producción extensivos sin suplementos alimenticios. Se necesita investigación y desarrollo continuos para desarrollar estrategias entéricas de mitigación de CH4 que sean aplicables localmente. Se necesita información para calcular la huella de carbono de las intervenciones a nivel regional para evaluar el impacto de las estrategias de mitigación en las emisiones netas de gases de efecto invernadero. Se necesitan con urgencia soluciones de mitigación de CH4 entéricas económicamente asequibles. La implementación exitosa de estrategias antimetanogénicas seguras y efectivas también requerirá mecanismos de entrega y apoyo técnico adecuado para los productores, así como la participación y aceptación de los consumidores. Se deben utilizar las métricas más apropiadas para cuantificar los resultados climáticos generales asociados con la mitigación de las emisiones entéricas de CH4. Se requiere un enfoque holístico y la aceptación es necesaria en todos los niveles de la cadena de suministro. Ruminant livestock are an important source of anthropogenic methane (CH4). Decreasing the emissions of enteric CH4 from ruminant production is strategic to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5°C by 2050. Research in the area of enteric CH4 mitigation has grown exponentially in the last 2 decades, with various strategies for enteric CH4 abatement being investigated: production intensification, dietary manipulation (including supplementation and processing of concentrates and lipids, and management of forage and pastures), rumen manipulation (supplementation of ionophores, 3-nitrooxypropanol, macroalgae, alternative electron acceptors, and phytochemicals), and selection of low-CH4-producing animals. Other enteric CH4 mitigation strategies are at earlier stages of research but rapidly developing. Herein, we discuss and analyze the current status of available enteric CH4 mitigation strategies with an emphasis on opportunities and barriers to their implementation in confined and partial grazing production systems, and in extensive and fully grazing production systems. For each enteric CH4 mitigation strategy, we discuss its effectiveness to decrease total CH4 emissions and emissions on a per animal product basis, safety issues, impacts on the emissions of other greenhouse gases, as well as other economic, regulatory, and societal aspects that are key to implementation. Most research has been conducted with confined animals, and considerably more research is needed to develop, adapt, and evaluate antimethanogenic strategies for grazing systems. In general, few options are currently available for extensive production systems without feed supplementation. Continuous research and development are needed to develop enteric CH4 mitigation strategies that are locally applicable. Information is needed to calculate carbon footprints of interventions on a regional basis to evaluate the impact of mitigation strategies on net greenhouse gas emissions. Economically affordable enteric CH4 mitigation solutions are urgently needed. Successful implementation of safe and effective antimethanogenic strategies will also require delivery mechanisms and adequate technical support for producers, as well as consumer involvement and acceptance. The most appropriate metrics should be used in quantifying the overall climate outcomes associated with mitigation of enteric CH4 emissions. A holistic approach is required, and buy-in is needed at all levels of the supply chain. تعد الثروة الحيوانية المجترة مصدرًا مهمًا للميثان البشري المنشأ (CH4). يعد خفض انبعاثات الميثان المعوي من إنتاج الحيوانات المجترة أمرًا استراتيجيًا للحد من زيادة درجة الحرارة العالمية إلى 1.5 درجة مئوية بحلول عام 2050. نمت الأبحاث في مجال التخفيف المعوي للميثان بشكل كبير في العقدين الماضيين، مع التحقيق في استراتيجيات مختلفة للتخفيف المعوي للميثان: تكثيف الإنتاج، والتلاعب الغذائي (بما في ذلك مكملات ومعالجة المركزات والدهون، وإدارة العلف والمراعي)، والتلاعب في الكرش (مكملات الحاملات الأيونية، و 3 -نيترو أكسي بروبانول، والطحالب الكبيرة، ومستقبلات الإلكترون البديلة، والمواد الكيميائية النباتية)، واختيار الحيوانات المنتجة للميثان المنخفض. لا تزال استراتيجيات التخفيف المعوية الأخرى للميثان في مراحل مبكرة من البحث ولكنها تتطور بسرعة. هنا، نناقش ونحلل الوضع الحالي لاستراتيجيات التخفيف من الميثان المعوي المتاحة مع التركيز على الفرص والعقبات التي تحول دون تنفيذها في أنظمة إنتاج الرعي المحصورة والجزئية، وفي أنظمة إنتاج الرعي المكثفة والكاملة. بالنسبة لكل استراتيجية تخفيف معوية للميثان، نناقش فعاليتها في تقليل إجمالي انبعاثات الميثان وانبعاثاته على أساس كل منتج حيواني، وقضايا السلامة، والتأثيرات على انبعاثات غازات الدفيئة الأخرى، بالإضافة إلى الجوانب الاقتصادية والتنظيمية والمجتمعية الأخرى التي تعتبر أساسية للتنفيذ. وقد أجريت معظم البحوث على الحيوانات المحصورة، وهناك حاجة إلى مزيد من البحوث لتطوير وتكييف وتقييم استراتيجيات مضادة للميثانوجين لأنظمة الرعي. بشكل عام، هناك عدد قليل من الخيارات المتاحة حاليًا لأنظمة الإنتاج المكثفة بدون مكملات الأعلاف. هناك حاجة إلى البحث والتطوير المستمرين لتطوير استراتيجيات التخفيف المعوية للميثان القابلة للتطبيق محليًا. هناك حاجة إلى معلومات لحساب البصمة الكربونية للتدخلات على أساس إقليمي لتقييم تأثير استراتيجيات التخفيف على صافي انبعاثات غازات الدفيئة. هناك حاجة ماسة إلى حلول تخفيف غاز الميثان المعوي ميسورة التكلفة اقتصاديًا. سيتطلب التنفيذ الناجح لاستراتيجيات آمنة وفعالة مضادة للميثان أيضًا آليات تسليم ودعمًا تقنيًا كافيًا للمنتجين، بالإضافة إلى مشاركة المستهلك وقبوله. يجب استخدام المقاييس الأكثر ملاءمة في تحديد النتائج المناخية العامة المرتبطة بالتخفيف من انبعاثات الميثان المعوي. هناك حاجة إلى نهج شامل، وهناك حاجة إلى المشاركة على جميع مستويات سلسلة التوريد.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/125142Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3168/jds.2022-22091&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 160 citations 160 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/125142Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3168/jds.2022-22091&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2020 France, France, ArgentinaPublisher:Frontiers Media SA Jacobo Arango; Alejandro Ruden; Deissy Martinez-Baron; Deissy Martinez-Baron; Ana María Loboguerrero; Ana María Loboguerrero; Alexandre Berndt; Mauricio Chacón; Carlos Felipe Torres; Walter Oyhantcabal; Carlos A. Gomez; Patricia Ricci; Juan Ku-Vera; Stefan Burkart; Jon M. Moorby; Ngonidzashe Chirinda; Ngonidzashe Chirinda;handle: 11336/148814 , 10568/108246
La production animale est une source essentielle de revenus et d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre (GES) agricoles en Colombie, au Brésil, en Argentine, au Costa Rica, en Uruguay, au Mexique et au Pérou. Plusieurs options de gestion et technologiques, avec un potentiel d'atténuation du méthane entérique, ont été évaluées et leur mise à l'échelle devrait contribuer à la réalisation des objectifs de réduction des émissions de GES. Pourtant, l'adoption généralisée d'options d'atténuation prometteuses reste limitée, ce qui soulève des questions quant à savoir si les objectifs de réduction des émissions envisagés sont réalisables. À l'aide de données générées localement, nous explorons les potentiels d'atténuation des technologies et des pratiques de gestion actuellement proposées pour atténuer les émissions de méthane entérique, pour les systèmes de production bovine dans les pays d'Amérique latine les plus émetteurs. Nous discutons ensuite des obstacles à l'adoption d'innovations qui réduisent considérablement les émissions de méthane entérique d'origine bovine et des changements majeurs dans les politiques et les pratiques qui sont nécessaires pour relever les ambitions nationales dans les pays à forte émission. En utilisant la science la plus récente et la pensée actuelle, nous fournissons notre point de vue sur une approche inclusive et ré-imaginons comment les secteurs universitaire, de la recherche, des affaires et des politiques publiques peuvent soutenir et encourager les changements nécessaires pour élever le niveau d'ambition et atteindre les objectifs de développement durable en envisageant des actions allant de la ferme à l'échelle nationale. La producción ganadera es una fuente fundamental de ingresos y emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) agrícolas en Colombia, Brasil, Argentina, Costa Rica, Uruguay, México y Perú. Se han evaluado varias opciones de gestión y tecnológicas, con potencial de mitigación de metano entérico, y se prevé que su escalado contribuya al logro de los objetivos de reducción de emisiones de GEI. Sin embargo, la adopción generalizada de opciones de mitigación prometedoras sigue siendo limitada, lo que plantea dudas sobre si los objetivos de reducción de emisiones previstos son alcanzables. Utilizando datos generados localmente, exploramos los potenciales de mitigación de las tecnologías y prácticas de manejo actualmente propuestas para mitigar las emisiones de metano entérico, para los sistemas de producción ganadera en los países de mayor emisión de América Latina. Luego discutimos las barreras para adoptar innovaciones que reduzcan significativamente las emisiones de metano entérico en el ganado y los cambios importantes en las políticas y prácticas que se necesitan para aumentar las ambiciones nacionales en los países con altas emisiones. Utilizando la ciencia más reciente y el pensamiento actual, brindamos nuestra perspectiva sobre un enfoque inclusivo y reimaginamos cómo los sectores académico, de investigación, empresarial y de políticas públicas pueden apoyar e incentivar los cambios necesarios para elevar el nivel de ambición y alcanzar los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible considerando acciones desde la granja hasta la escala nacional. Livestock production is a pivotal source of income and agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Costa Rica, Uruguay, Mexico and Peru. Several management and technological options, with enteric methane mitigation potential, have been evaluated and their scaling is anticipated to contribute towards achieving GHG emission reduction targets. Yet, widespread adoption of promising mitigation options remains limited, raising questions as to whether envisaged emission reduction targets are achievable. Using locally generated data, we explore the mitigation potentials of technologies and management practices currently proposed to mitigate enteric methane emissions, for cattle production systems in the higher emitting countries of Latin America. We then discuss barriers for adopting innovations that significantly reduce cattle-based enteric methane emissions and the major shifts in policy and practice that are needed to raise national ambitions in the high emitting countries. Using the latest science and current thinking, we provide our perspective on an inclusive approach and re-imagine how the academic, research, business and public policy sectors can support and incentivize the changes needed to raise the level of ambition and achieve sustainable development goals considering actions all the way from the farm to the national scale. الإنتاج الحيواني هو مصدر محوري للدخل وانبعاثات غازات الدفيئة الزراعية في كولومبيا والبرازيل والأرجنتين وكوستاريكا وأوروغواي والمكسيك وبيرو. تم تقييم العديد من خيارات الإدارة والخيارات التكنولوجية، مع إمكانية تخفيف الميثان المعوي، ومن المتوقع أن يساهم قياسها في تحقيق أهداف خفض انبعاثات غازات الدفيئة. ومع ذلك، لا يزال الاعتماد الواسع النطاق لخيارات التخفيف الواعدة محدودًا، مما يثير تساؤلات حول ما إذا كانت أهداف خفض الانبعاثات المتوخاة قابلة للتحقيق. باستخدام البيانات التي تم إنشاؤها محليًا، نستكشف إمكانات التخفيف من التقنيات وممارسات الإدارة المقترحة حاليًا للتخفيف من انبعاثات الميثان المعوية، لأنظمة إنتاج الماشية في البلدان ذات الانبعاثات الأعلى في أمريكا اللاتينية. ثم نناقش العوائق التي تحول دون اعتماد الابتكارات التي تقلل بشكل كبير من انبعاثات الميثان المعوي القائم على الماشية والتحولات الرئيسية في السياسات والممارسات اللازمة لرفع الطموحات الوطنية في البلدان ذات الانبعاثات العالية. باستخدام أحدث العلوم والتفكير الحالي، نقدم وجهة نظرنا حول نهج شامل ونعيد تصور كيف يمكن للقطاعات الأكاديمية والبحثية وقطاع الأعمال والسياسة العامة دعم وتحفيز التغييرات اللازمة لرفع مستوى الطموح وتحقيق أهداف التنمية المستدامة مع الأخذ في الاعتبار الإجراءات على طول الطريق من المزرعة إلى النطاق الوطني.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2020License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108246Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3389/fsufs.2020.00065&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 44 citations 44 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2020License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108246Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3389/fsufs.2020.00065&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2016 BrazilPublisher:Elsevier BV Abmael S. Cardoso; Alexandre Berndt; April Leytem; Bruno J.R. Alves; Isabel das N.O. de Carvalho; Luis Henrique de Barros Soares; Segundo Urquiaga; Robert M. Boddey;handle: 11449/172348
Brazil has the largest herd of beef cattle in the world, estimated at approximately 200 million animals. Production is predominantly pasture-based and low input and hence time to slaughter is long, which promotes high methane (CH4) emissions per kg of product. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of increasing animal productivity using fertilizers, forage legumes, supplements and concentrates, on the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in five scenarios for beef production in Brazil. A life cycle analysis (LCA) approach, from birth of calves to mature animals ready for slaughter at the farm gate, was utilized using Tier 2 methodologies of the IPCC and the results expressed in equivalents of carbon dioxide (CO2eq) per kg of carcass produced. Fossil CO2 emitted in the production of supplements, feeds and fertilizers was included using standard LCA techniques. The first four scenarios were based solely on cattle production on pasture, ranging from degraded Brachiaria pastures, through to a mixed legume/Brachiaria pasture and improved N-fertilized pastures of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum). Scenario 5 was the most intensive and was also based on an N-fertilized Guinea grass pasture, but with a 75-day finishing period in confinement with total mixed ration (TMR). Across the scenarios from 1 to 5 the increase in digestibility promoted a reduction in the forage intake per unit of animal weight gain and a concomitant reduction in CH4 emissions. For the estimation of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from animal excreta, emission factors from a study in the Cerrado region were utilized which postulated lower emission from dung than from urine and much lower emissions in the long dry season in this region. The greatest impact of intensification of the beef production systems was a 7-fold reduction of the area necessary for production from 320 to 45 m2/kg carcass. Carcass production increased from 43 to 65 Mg per herd across the scenarios from 1 to 5, and total emissions per kg carcass were estimated to be reduced from 58.3 to 29.4 kg CO2eq/kg carcass. Even though animal weight gain was lower in the mixed grass-legume scenario (3) than for the N-fertilized Guinea grass pastures (scenarios 4 and 5) GHG emissions per kg carcass were similar as the legume N2 fixation input had no fossil-fuel cost. A large source of uncertainty for the construction of such LCAs was the lack of data for enteric CH4 emissions from cattle grazing tropical forages.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 162 citations 162 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.007&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2023Publisher:MDPI AG Authors: Althieres José Furtado; Adibe Luiz Abdalla Filho; Jaqueline Fernandes Bruno; Rolando Pasquini Neto; +9 AuthorsAlthieres José Furtado; Adibe Luiz Abdalla Filho; Jaqueline Fernandes Bruno; Rolando Pasquini Neto; Annelise Aila Gomes Lobo; Gabriele Voltareli da Silva; Flavio Perna Junior; Teresa Cristina Alves; Alexandre Berndt; André de Faria Pedroso; Sérgio Raposo de Medeiros; Patrícia Perondi Anchão Oliveira; Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues;In this study, we evaluate the effects of intercropping pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) with tropical pastures for feeding Nellore cattle and compared animal performance and enteric CH4 emissions with other pasture-based systems during the dry and rainy seasons of 2021. Thirty-six Nellore steers (with a body weight of 221 ± 7 kg and an age of 15–16 months) were randomly distributed in three treatments with three replicates (in paddocks of 1.5 hectares each): (1) a degraded pasture of Urochloa spp. (DEG); (2) a recovered and fertilized pasture of Urochloa spp. (REC); and (3) pigeon pea intercropped with Urochloa spp. (MIX). Enteric CH4 emissions were estimated using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas technique, and dry matter intake (DMI) was determined using internal (iNDF) and external (TiO2) markers. Forages were collected by hand plucking after observations of ingestive behavior, and feces was collected after voluntary defecation. The proportion of grass and legume intake was estimated by C stable isotopes, and the forage nutritional quality was determined, while animal performance was monitored monthly, and the stocking rate was adjusted by the “put and take” technique. The results indicated that intercropping pigeon pea with tropical grasses is an interesting strategy for sustainable livestock production based on pastures. The MIX treatment was able to meet the nutritional requirements of the animals, which presented higher performance. In addition, there was a reduction in CH4 emissions up to 70% when expressed per average daily weight gain in comparison to the DEG treatment.
Animals arrow_drop_down AnimalsOther literature type . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/8/1323/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/ani13081323&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 9 citations 9 popularity Average influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert Animals arrow_drop_down AnimalsOther literature type . 2023License: CC BYFull-Text: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/8/1323/pdfData sources: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/ani13081323&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2020Publisher:Elsevier BV P.P.A. Oliveira; A. Berndt; A.F. Pedroso; T.C. Alves; J.R.M. Pezzopane; L.S. Sakamoto; F.L. Henrique; P.H.M. Rodrigues;pmid: 32829724
The production of beef cattle in the Atlantic Forest biome mostly takes place in pastoral production systems. There are millions of hectares covered with pastures in this biome, including degraded pasture (DP), and only small area of the original Atlantic Forest has been preserved in tropics, implying that actions must be taken by the livestock sector to improve sustainability. Intensification makes it possible to produce the same amount, or more beef, in a smaller area; however, the environmental impacts must be assessed. Regarding climate change, the C dynamics is essential to define which beef cattle systems are sustainable. The objectives of this study were to investigate the C balance (t CO2e./ha per year), the intensity of C emission (kg CO2e./kg BW or carcass) and the C footprint (t CO2e./ha per year) of pasture-based beef cattle production systems, inside the farm gate and considering the inputs. The results were used to calculate the number of trees to be planted in beef cattle production systems to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The GHG emission and C balance, for 2 years, were calculated based on the global warming potential (GWP) of AR4 and GWP of AR5. Forty-eight steers were allotted to four grazing systems: DP, irrigated high stocking rate pasture (IHS), rainfed high stocking rate pasture (RHS) and rainfed medium stocking rate pasture (RMS). The rainfed systems (RHS and RMS) presented the lowest C footprints (-1.22 and 0.45 t CO2e./ha per year, respectively), with C credits to RMS when using the GWP of AR4. The IHS system showed less favorable results for C footprint (-15.71 t CO2e./ha per year), but results were better when emissions were expressed in relation to the annual BW gain (-10.21 kg CO2e./kg BW) because of its higher yield. Although the DP system had an intermediate result for C footprint (-6.23 t CO2e./ha per year), the result was the worst (-30.21 CO2e./kg BW) when the index was expressed in relation to the annual BW gain, because in addition to GHG emissions from the animals in the system there were also losses in the annual rate of C sequestration. Notably, the intensification in pasture management had a land-saving effect (3.63 ha for IHS, 1.90 for RHS and 1.19 for RMS), contributing to the preservation of the tropical forest.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1017/s1751731120001822&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 26 citations 26 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1017/s1751731120001822&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal , Other literature type 2021 France, France, Netherlands, BrazilPublisher:Elsevier BV Authors: María Fernanda Vázquez-Carrillo; Ricardo Andrade Reis; José Gere; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; +75 AuthorsMaría Fernanda Vázquez-Carrillo; Ricardo Andrade Reis; José Gere; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; Telma Teresinha Berchielli; L. S. Sakamoto; Claudia Janeth Ariza-Nieto; Ana Cláudia Ruggieri; Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio; Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio; Xiomara Gaviria-Uribe; Xiomara Gaviria-Uribe; Fábio Luis Henrique; María Paula Juliarena; Tainá Silvestre Moreira; Sandra Lucía Posada-Ochoa; Marcos Inácio Marcondes; Jusiane Rossetto; Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero; Sergio Abarca-Monge; Roberto Soto-Blanco; João Paulo Pacheco Rodrigues; Carlos Alfredo Gómez-Bravo; F.A.S. Silva; Laura Bibiana Gualdrón-Duarte; Mohammed Benaouda; Rolando Barahona-Rosales; Luiza Ilha Borges; Abmael da Silva Cardoso; Lorena Inés Mestra-Vargas; Medardo Antonio Díaz Céspedes; André Bannink; André Bannink; Ana Luiza Costa Cruz Borges; Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho; Luis Alfonso Giraldo Valderrama; M. B. Chiavegato; Andrea Milena Sierra-Alarcón; Mariana Magalhães Campos; Flávio Perna Júnior; Ever del Jesus Flores-Santiago; Ever del Jesus Flores-Santiago; Jacobo Arango; Octavio Alonso Castelán-Ortega; María Paz Tieri; Ricardo Reis e Silva; Sebastiao de Campos Valadares-Filho; Banira Lombardi; Olegario Hernández; Patrícia Perondi Anchão Oliveira; Alda Lúcia Gomes Monteiro; Fernanda Samarini Machado; Luiz Gustavo Ribeiro Pereira; Jaime Ricardo Rosero-Noguera; Juan Carlos Ku-Vera; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Jean Victor Savian; Adibe Luiz Abdalla; María Esperanza Cerón-Cucchi; Camila Muñoz; Juliana Duarte Messana; Gustavo Jaurena; Laura Astigarraga; Abimael Ortiz-Chura; Horacio Leandro Gonda; Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo; Patricia Ricci; Thierry Ribeiro Tomich; Sila Carneiro da Silva; Víctor Ilich Alvarado Bolovich; Rogério Martins Maurício; Henrique Mendonça Nunes Ribeiro-Filho; Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues; Olga Lucía Mayorga Mogollón; Adibe Luiz Abdalla-Filho; Alexandre Berndt; Alexander N. Hristov; Diego Zanetti; Helena Ferreira Lage;handle: 11449/207853 , 10568/114504
Abstract Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security, producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region's ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier's removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk yield (MY; dairy cattle) or average daily gain (ADG; beef cattle and sheep). The breed composition F1 Holstein × Gyr decreased CH4 emission per MY (CH4IMilk) while increasing MY by 99%. Adequate strategies of grazing management under continuous and rotational stocking decreased CH4 emission per ADG (CH4IGain) by 22 and 35%, while increasing ADG by 22 and 71%, respectively. Increased dietary protein concentration, and increased concentrate level through cottonseed meal inclusion, decreased CH4IMilk and CH4IGain by 10 and 20% and increased MY and ADG by 12 and 31%, respectively. Lastly, increased feeding level decreased CH4IGain by 37%, while increasing ADG by 171%. The identified effective mitigation strategies can be adopted by livestock producers according to their specific needs and aid LAC countries in achieving SDG as defined in the Paris Agreement.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114504Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Cleaner ProductionArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefWageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversidade Estadual Paulista São Paulo: Repositório Institucional UNESPArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 64 citations 64 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2021License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114504Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Cleaner ProductionArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefWageningen Staff PublicationsArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Wageningen Staff PublicationsUniversidade Estadual Paulista São Paulo: Repositório Institucional UNESPArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 2021 United Kingdom, United Kingdom, FrancePublisher:Oxford University Press (OUP) Publicly fundedFunded by:UKRI | S2N - Soil to Nutrition -..., UKRI | RootDetect: Remote Detect...UKRI| S2N - Soil to Nutrition - Work package 2 (WP2) - Adaptive management systems for improved efficiency and nutritional quality ,UKRI| RootDetect: Remote Detection and Precision Management of Root HealthM. J. Rivero; Graeme Martin; P. Rovira; Tommy M. Boland; D. Enriquez-Hidalgo; D. Enriquez-Hidalgo; Paul N. C. Murphy; Paul Harris; F. Pereyra; Walter Ayala; A. Berndt; Mark C Eisler; Helen Sheridan; David R. Chadwick; Randall D. Jackson; D. Busch; C. Mignolet; P. T. Suraj; Gregg R. Sanford; N. Lopez-Villalobos; Thomas Puech; A. Cartmill; David I. McCracken; Alexander C.O. Evans; A.P. Williams; Michael R. F. Lee; A. Dowsey; Iain A. Wright; A. Farruggia; L. Brunet; R. Machado;pmid: 34676139
pmc: PMC8527498
Implications • La plateforme agricole mondiale a été conçue et mise en place pour explorer des stratégies multidisciplinaires pour optimiser la durabilité des systèmes de ruminants dans le monde. • Les problèmes de durabilité internationale sont courants, mais les solutions sont souvent spécifiques à la région ; par conséquent, notre les fermes, situées dans toutes les principales zones agroclimatiques, sont une ressource unique au monde. • Chaque exploitation suit les étapes de l'élevage durable pour améliorer son (ses) système(s) de production, développer des mesures robustes pour faire progresser la viabilité économique, environnementale et sociale. • Le consortium travaille en collaboration pour améliorer la la durabilité des ruminants, que nous considérons comme une composante des systèmes alimentaires mondiaux, fournissant à la fois santé humaine et planétaire. Implicaciones • La Plataforma Global Farm fue concebida y establecida para explorar estrategias multidisciplinarias para optimizar la sostenibilidad de los sistemas de rumiantes en todo el mundo. • Los problemas internacionales de sostenibilidad son comunes, pero las soluciones a menudo son específicas de la región; por lo tanto, nuestro granjas, situadas en todas las principales zonas agroclimáticas, son un recurso único en todo el mundo. • Cada granja está siguiendo los pasos para la ganadería sostenible para mejorar su (s) sistema(s) de producción, por lo tanto desarrollar métricas sólidas para avanzar en la viabilidad económica, ambiental y social. • El consorcio trabaja en colaboración para mejorar la sostenibilidad de los rumiantes, que argumentamos que son una componente de los sistemas alimentarios globales, entregando tanto salud humana y planetaria. Implications • The Global Farm Platform was conceived and established to explore multidisciplinary strategies for optimising the sustainability of ruminant systems around the world. • International sustainability issues are common, but the solutions are often region-specific; therefore, our farms, situated across all major agroclimatic zones, are a unique resource worldwide. • Each farm is following steps to sustainable livestock to improve their production system(s), thereby developing robust metrics to progress economic, environmental and social viability. • The consortium works collaboratively to improve the sustainability of ruminants, which we argue are a vital component of global food systems, delivering both human and planetary health. الآثار المترتبة • تم تصميم وإنشاء المنصة العالمية للمزارع لاستكشاف استراتيجيات متعددة التخصصات تحسين استدامة أنظمة الحيوانات المجترة في جميع أنحاء العالم. • قضايا الاستدامة الدولية شائعة، ولكن غالبًا ما تكون الحلول خاصة بالمنطقة ؛ لذلك، المزارع، التي تقع في جميع المناطق الزراعية المناخية الرئيسية، هي مورد فريد من نوعه في جميع أنحاء العالم. • تتبع كل مزرعة خطوات نحو الثروة الحيوانية المستدامة لتحسين نظام(أنظمة) الإنتاج الخاصة بها، وبالتالي تطوير مقاييس قوية للتقدم في الجدوى الاقتصادية والبيئية والاجتماعية. • يعمل الكونسورتيوم بشكل تعاوني لتحسين استدامة الحيوانات المجترة، والتي نعتبرها حيوية في النظم الغذائية العالمية، وتقديم كل من صحة الإنسان والكوكب.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115719Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/af/vfab048&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 13 citations 13 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115719Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bristol: Bristol ResearchArticle . 2021Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique: ProdINRAArticle . 2021License: CC BY NCData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1093/af/vfab048&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2018Publisher:Universidade Estadual de Maringa Authors: Tatiana Lucila Pires Sobrinho; Renata Helena Branco; Elaine Magnani; Alexandre Berndt; +2 AuthorsTatiana Lucila Pires Sobrinho; Renata Helena Branco; Elaine Magnani; Alexandre Berndt; Roberta Carrilho Canesin; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante;LAReferencia - Red F... arrow_drop_down LAReferencia - Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas LatinoamericanasArticle . 2018License: CC BYActa Scientiarum: Animal SciencesArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.42559&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert LAReferencia - Red F... arrow_drop_down LAReferencia - Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas LatinoamericanasArticle . 2018License: CC BYActa Scientiarum: Animal SciencesArticle . 2018 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.42559&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2013Publisher:Elsevier BV Authors: N. W. Tomkins; Alexandre Berndt;pmid: 23739477
The growing global demand for food of animal origin will be the incentive for countries such as Australia and Brazil to increase their beef production and international exports. This increased supply of beef is expected to occur primarily through on-farm productivity increases. The strategies for reducing resultant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions should be evaluated in the context of the production system and should encompass a broader analysis, which would include the emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon sequestration. This paper provides an insight into CH4 measurement techniques applicable to grazing environments and proposed mitigation strategies, with relevance to the production systems that are predominant in grazing systems of Australia and Brazil. Research and technology investment in both Australia and Brazil is aimed at developing measurement techniques and increasing the efficiency of cattle production by improving herd genetics, utilization of the seasonal feed-base and reducing the proportion of metabolizable energy lost as CH4. Concerted efforts in these areas can be expected to reduce the number of unproductive animals, reduce age at slaughter and inevitably reduce emission intensity (EI) from beef production systems. Improving efficiency of livestock production systems in tropical grazing systems for Australia and Brazil will be based on cultivated and existing native pastures and the use of additives and by-products from other agricultural sectors. This approach spares grain-based feed reserves typically used for human consumption, but potentially incurs a heavier EI than current intensive feeding systems. The determination of GHG emissions and the value of mitigation outcomes for entire beef production systems in the extensive grazing systems is complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. It is fortunate that governments in both Australia and Brazil are supporting ongoing research activities. Nevertheless, to achieve an outcome that feeds a growing population while reducing emissions on a global scale continues to be a monumental challenge for ruminant nutritionists.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1017/s1751731113000670&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess Routesgold 50 citations 50 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1017/s1751731113000670&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2002Publisher:FapUNIFESP (SciELO) Authors: Berndt, Alexandre; Henrique, Wignez; Leme, Paulo Roberto; Alleoni, Guilherme Fernando; +1 AuthorsBerndt, Alexandre; Henrique, Wignez; Leme, Paulo Roberto; Alleoni, Guilherme Fernando; Lanna, Dante Pazzanese Duarte;Foram utilizados 32 tourinhos Santa Gertrudis inicialmente com dez meses de idade e 245 kg de peso, alimentados em confinamento com dietas contendo 88% de concentrado. Quatro animais foram abatidos no início do experimento (linha base) para estimativa da composição corporal inicial. Os 28 animais restantes foram distribuídos em baias individuais com delineamento de blocos ao acaso em arranjo fatorial 2x2 (dois volumosos x dois processamentos do milho grão) com sete repetições. Os volumosos incluíam silagem da planta de milho ou bagaço de cana-de-açúcar e os dois processamentos do grão de milho, o grão colhido seco e triturado e o colhido e ensilado úmido. Estimou-se, por intermédio da regressão do logaritmo do conteúdo corporal de energia, em função do logaritmo do peso do corpo vazio, o conteúdo de energia e proteína para ganho de peso em qualquer faixa de peso vazio incluída neste trabalho: para ganho de 1 kg, em um animal de 300 kg, foram necessárias 3,64 Mcal/dia de energia e 129,5 g de proteína.
Revista Brasileira d... arrow_drop_down Scientific Electronic Library Online - BrazilArticle . 2002License: CC BY NCData sources: Scientific Electronic Library Online - Braziladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1590/s1516-35982002000800025&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Average influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert Revista Brasileira d... arrow_drop_down Scientific Electronic Library Online - BrazilArticle . 2002License: CC BY NCData sources: Scientific Electronic Library Online - Braziladd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1590/s1516-35982002000800025&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2022 France, Ireland, FrancePublisher:American Dairy Science Association Publicly fundedK. A. Beauchemin; Emilio M. Ungerfeld; Adibe Luiz Abdalla; Clementina Álvarez; Claudia Arndt; Philippe Becquet; C. Benchaar; A. Berndt; Rogério Martins Maurício; Tim A. McAllister; Walter Oyhantçabal; Saheed A. Salami; L. Shalloo; Yan Sun; J.M. Tricárico; Aimable Uwizeye; Camillo De Camillis; Martial Bernoux; Timothy P. Robinson; E. Kebreab;pmid: 36270879
handle: 11019/3342 , 10568/125142
Le bétail ruminant est une source importante de méthane anthropique (CH4). La diminution des émissions de CH4 entérique provenant de la production de ruminants est stratégique pour limiter l'augmentation de la température mondiale à 1,5 °C d'ici 2050. La recherche dans le domaine de l'atténuation du CH4 entérique a connu une croissance exponentielle au cours des deux dernières décennies, diverses stratégies de réduction du CH4 entérique étant à l'étude : intensification de la production, manipulation alimentaire (y compris la supplémentation et le traitement des concentrés et des lipides, et la gestion du fourrage et des pâturages), manipulation du rumen (supplémentation en ionophores, 3-nitrooxypropanol, macroalgues, accepteurs d'électrons alternatifs et phytochimiques) et sélection d'animaux à faible teneur en CH4. D'autres stratégies d'atténuation du CH4 entérique en sont aux premiers stades de la recherche, mais se développent rapidement. Ici, nous discutons et analysons l'état actuel des stratégies d'atténuation du CH4 entérique disponibles en mettant l'accent sur les opportunités et les obstacles à leur mise en œuvre dans les systèmes de production de pâturage confinés et partiels, et dans les systèmes de production de pâturage étendus et complets. Pour chaque stratégie d'atténuation du CH4 entérique, nous discutons de son efficacité à réduire les émissions totales de CH4 et les émissions par produit animal, des problèmes de sécurité, des impacts sur les émissions d'autres gaz à effet de serre, ainsi que d'autres aspects économiques, réglementaires et sociétaux qui sont essentiels à la mise en œuvre. La plupart des recherches ont été menées avec des animaux confinés, et beaucoup plus de recherches sont nécessaires pour développer, adapter et évaluer des stratégies antiméthanogènes pour les systèmes de pâturage. En général, peu d'options sont actuellement disponibles pour les systèmes de production extensifs sans supplémentation alimentaire. La recherche et le développement continus sont nécessaires pour développer des stratégies d'atténuation du CH4 entérique qui sont applicables localement. Des informations sont nécessaires pour calculer l'empreinte carbone des interventions sur une base régionale afin d'évaluer l'impact des stratégies d'atténuation sur les émissions nettes de gaz à effet de serre. Des solutions d'atténuation du CH4 entérique économiquement abordables sont nécessaires de toute urgence. La mise en œuvre réussie de stratégies antiméthanogènes sûres et efficaces nécessitera également des mécanismes de livraison et un soutien technique adéquat pour les producteurs, ainsi que la participation et l'acceptation des consommateurs. Les paramètres les plus appropriés doivent être utilisés pour quantifier les résultats climatiques globaux associés à l'atténuation des émissions entériques de CH4. Une approche holistique est nécessaire, et l'adhésion est nécessaire à tous les niveaux de la chaîne d'approvisionnement. El ganado rumiante es una fuente importante de metano antropogénico (CH4). Disminuir las emisiones de CH4 entérico de la producción de rumiantes es estratégico para limitar el aumento de la temperatura global a 1,5 °C para 2050. La investigación en el área de la mitigación entérica de CH4 ha crecido exponencialmente en las últimas 2 décadas, y se están investigando diversas estrategias para la reducción entérica de CH4: intensificación de la producción, manipulación dietética (incluida la suplementación y el procesamiento de concentrados y lípidos, y el manejo de forrajes y pastos), manipulación del rumen (suplementación de ionóforos, 3-nitrooxipropanol, macroalgas, aceptores de electrones alternativos y fitoquímicos) y selección de animales con baja producción de CH4. Otras estrategias entéricas de mitigación de CH4 se encuentran en etapas más tempranas de investigación, pero se están desarrollando rápidamente. En este documento, discutimos y analizamos el estado actual de las estrategias de mitigación entérica de CH4 disponibles con énfasis en las oportunidades y barreras para su implementación en sistemas de producción de pastoreo confinado y parcial, y en sistemas de producción extensiva y de pastoreo completo. Para cada estrategia entérica de mitigación de CH4, discutimos su efectividad para disminuir las emisiones totales de CH4 y las emisiones por producto animal, los problemas de seguridad, los impactos en las emisiones de otros gases de efecto invernadero, así como otros aspectos económicos, regulatorios y sociales que son clave para la implementación. La mayoría de las investigaciones se han realizado con animales confinados, y se necesita mucha más investigación para desarrollar, adaptar y evaluar estrategias antimetanogénicas para los sistemas de pastoreo. En general, actualmente hay pocas opciones disponibles para sistemas de producción extensivos sin suplementos alimenticios. Se necesita investigación y desarrollo continuos para desarrollar estrategias entéricas de mitigación de CH4 que sean aplicables localmente. Se necesita información para calcular la huella de carbono de las intervenciones a nivel regional para evaluar el impacto de las estrategias de mitigación en las emisiones netas de gases de efecto invernadero. Se necesitan con urgencia soluciones de mitigación de CH4 entéricas económicamente asequibles. La implementación exitosa de estrategias antimetanogénicas seguras y efectivas también requerirá mecanismos de entrega y apoyo técnico adecuado para los productores, así como la participación y aceptación de los consumidores. Se deben utilizar las métricas más apropiadas para cuantificar los resultados climáticos generales asociados con la mitigación de las emisiones entéricas de CH4. Se requiere un enfoque holístico y la aceptación es necesaria en todos los niveles de la cadena de suministro. Ruminant livestock are an important source of anthropogenic methane (CH4). Decreasing the emissions of enteric CH4 from ruminant production is strategic to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5°C by 2050. Research in the area of enteric CH4 mitigation has grown exponentially in the last 2 decades, with various strategies for enteric CH4 abatement being investigated: production intensification, dietary manipulation (including supplementation and processing of concentrates and lipids, and management of forage and pastures), rumen manipulation (supplementation of ionophores, 3-nitrooxypropanol, macroalgae, alternative electron acceptors, and phytochemicals), and selection of low-CH4-producing animals. Other enteric CH4 mitigation strategies are at earlier stages of research but rapidly developing. Herein, we discuss and analyze the current status of available enteric CH4 mitigation strategies with an emphasis on opportunities and barriers to their implementation in confined and partial grazing production systems, and in extensive and fully grazing production systems. For each enteric CH4 mitigation strategy, we discuss its effectiveness to decrease total CH4 emissions and emissions on a per animal product basis, safety issues, impacts on the emissions of other greenhouse gases, as well as other economic, regulatory, and societal aspects that are key to implementation. Most research has been conducted with confined animals, and considerably more research is needed to develop, adapt, and evaluate antimethanogenic strategies for grazing systems. In general, few options are currently available for extensive production systems without feed supplementation. Continuous research and development are needed to develop enteric CH4 mitigation strategies that are locally applicable. Information is needed to calculate carbon footprints of interventions on a regional basis to evaluate the impact of mitigation strategies on net greenhouse gas emissions. Economically affordable enteric CH4 mitigation solutions are urgently needed. Successful implementation of safe and effective antimethanogenic strategies will also require delivery mechanisms and adequate technical support for producers, as well as consumer involvement and acceptance. The most appropriate metrics should be used in quantifying the overall climate outcomes associated with mitigation of enteric CH4 emissions. A holistic approach is required, and buy-in is needed at all levels of the supply chain. تعد الثروة الحيوانية المجترة مصدرًا مهمًا للميثان البشري المنشأ (CH4). يعد خفض انبعاثات الميثان المعوي من إنتاج الحيوانات المجترة أمرًا استراتيجيًا للحد من زيادة درجة الحرارة العالمية إلى 1.5 درجة مئوية بحلول عام 2050. نمت الأبحاث في مجال التخفيف المعوي للميثان بشكل كبير في العقدين الماضيين، مع التحقيق في استراتيجيات مختلفة للتخفيف المعوي للميثان: تكثيف الإنتاج، والتلاعب الغذائي (بما في ذلك مكملات ومعالجة المركزات والدهون، وإدارة العلف والمراعي)، والتلاعب في الكرش (مكملات الحاملات الأيونية، و 3 -نيترو أكسي بروبانول، والطحالب الكبيرة، ومستقبلات الإلكترون البديلة، والمواد الكيميائية النباتية)، واختيار الحيوانات المنتجة للميثان المنخفض. لا تزال استراتيجيات التخفيف المعوية الأخرى للميثان في مراحل مبكرة من البحث ولكنها تتطور بسرعة. هنا، نناقش ونحلل الوضع الحالي لاستراتيجيات التخفيف من الميثان المعوي المتاحة مع التركيز على الفرص والعقبات التي تحول دون تنفيذها في أنظمة إنتاج الرعي المحصورة والجزئية، وفي أنظمة إنتاج الرعي المكثفة والكاملة. بالنسبة لكل استراتيجية تخفيف معوية للميثان، نناقش فعاليتها في تقليل إجمالي انبعاثات الميثان وانبعاثاته على أساس كل منتج حيواني، وقضايا السلامة، والتأثيرات على انبعاثات غازات الدفيئة الأخرى، بالإضافة إلى الجوانب الاقتصادية والتنظيمية والمجتمعية الأخرى التي تعتبر أساسية للتنفيذ. وقد أجريت معظم البحوث على الحيوانات المحصورة، وهناك حاجة إلى مزيد من البحوث لتطوير وتكييف وتقييم استراتيجيات مضادة للميثانوجين لأنظمة الرعي. بشكل عام، هناك عدد قليل من الخيارات المتاحة حاليًا لأنظمة الإنتاج المكثفة بدون مكملات الأعلاف. هناك حاجة إلى البحث والتطوير المستمرين لتطوير استراتيجيات التخفيف المعوية للميثان القابلة للتطبيق محليًا. هناك حاجة إلى معلومات لحساب البصمة الكربونية للتدخلات على أساس إقليمي لتقييم تأثير استراتيجيات التخفيف على صافي انبعاثات غازات الدفيئة. هناك حاجة ماسة إلى حلول تخفيف غاز الميثان المعوي ميسورة التكلفة اقتصاديًا. سيتطلب التنفيذ الناجح لاستراتيجيات آمنة وفعالة مضادة للميثان أيضًا آليات تسليم ودعمًا تقنيًا كافيًا للمنتجين، بالإضافة إلى مشاركة المستهلك وقبوله. يجب استخدام المقاييس الأكثر ملاءمة في تحديد النتائج المناخية العامة المرتبطة بالتخفيف من انبعاثات الميثان المعوي. هناك حاجة إلى نهج شامل، وهناك حاجة إلى المشاركة على جميع مستويات سلسلة التوريد.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/125142Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3168/jds.2022-22091&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 160 citations 160 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 0.1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/125142Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3168/jds.2022-22091&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 2020 France, France, ArgentinaPublisher:Frontiers Media SA Jacobo Arango; Alejandro Ruden; Deissy Martinez-Baron; Deissy Martinez-Baron; Ana María Loboguerrero; Ana María Loboguerrero; Alexandre Berndt; Mauricio Chacón; Carlos Felipe Torres; Walter Oyhantcabal; Carlos A. Gomez; Patricia Ricci; Juan Ku-Vera; Stefan Burkart; Jon M. Moorby; Ngonidzashe Chirinda; Ngonidzashe Chirinda;handle: 11336/148814 , 10568/108246
La production animale est une source essentielle de revenus et d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre (GES) agricoles en Colombie, au Brésil, en Argentine, au Costa Rica, en Uruguay, au Mexique et au Pérou. Plusieurs options de gestion et technologiques, avec un potentiel d'atténuation du méthane entérique, ont été évaluées et leur mise à l'échelle devrait contribuer à la réalisation des objectifs de réduction des émissions de GES. Pourtant, l'adoption généralisée d'options d'atténuation prometteuses reste limitée, ce qui soulève des questions quant à savoir si les objectifs de réduction des émissions envisagés sont réalisables. À l'aide de données générées localement, nous explorons les potentiels d'atténuation des technologies et des pratiques de gestion actuellement proposées pour atténuer les émissions de méthane entérique, pour les systèmes de production bovine dans les pays d'Amérique latine les plus émetteurs. Nous discutons ensuite des obstacles à l'adoption d'innovations qui réduisent considérablement les émissions de méthane entérique d'origine bovine et des changements majeurs dans les politiques et les pratiques qui sont nécessaires pour relever les ambitions nationales dans les pays à forte émission. En utilisant la science la plus récente et la pensée actuelle, nous fournissons notre point de vue sur une approche inclusive et ré-imaginons comment les secteurs universitaire, de la recherche, des affaires et des politiques publiques peuvent soutenir et encourager les changements nécessaires pour élever le niveau d'ambition et atteindre les objectifs de développement durable en envisageant des actions allant de la ferme à l'échelle nationale. La producción ganadera es una fuente fundamental de ingresos y emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) agrícolas en Colombia, Brasil, Argentina, Costa Rica, Uruguay, México y Perú. Se han evaluado varias opciones de gestión y tecnológicas, con potencial de mitigación de metano entérico, y se prevé que su escalado contribuya al logro de los objetivos de reducción de emisiones de GEI. Sin embargo, la adopción generalizada de opciones de mitigación prometedoras sigue siendo limitada, lo que plantea dudas sobre si los objetivos de reducción de emisiones previstos son alcanzables. Utilizando datos generados localmente, exploramos los potenciales de mitigación de las tecnologías y prácticas de manejo actualmente propuestas para mitigar las emisiones de metano entérico, para los sistemas de producción ganadera en los países de mayor emisión de América Latina. Luego discutimos las barreras para adoptar innovaciones que reduzcan significativamente las emisiones de metano entérico en el ganado y los cambios importantes en las políticas y prácticas que se necesitan para aumentar las ambiciones nacionales en los países con altas emisiones. Utilizando la ciencia más reciente y el pensamiento actual, brindamos nuestra perspectiva sobre un enfoque inclusivo y reimaginamos cómo los sectores académico, de investigación, empresarial y de políticas públicas pueden apoyar e incentivar los cambios necesarios para elevar el nivel de ambición y alcanzar los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible considerando acciones desde la granja hasta la escala nacional. Livestock production is a pivotal source of income and agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Costa Rica, Uruguay, Mexico and Peru. Several management and technological options, with enteric methane mitigation potential, have been evaluated and their scaling is anticipated to contribute towards achieving GHG emission reduction targets. Yet, widespread adoption of promising mitigation options remains limited, raising questions as to whether envisaged emission reduction targets are achievable. Using locally generated data, we explore the mitigation potentials of technologies and management practices currently proposed to mitigate enteric methane emissions, for cattle production systems in the higher emitting countries of Latin America. We then discuss barriers for adopting innovations that significantly reduce cattle-based enteric methane emissions and the major shifts in policy and practice that are needed to raise national ambitions in the high emitting countries. Using the latest science and current thinking, we provide our perspective on an inclusive approach and re-imagine how the academic, research, business and public policy sectors can support and incentivize the changes needed to raise the level of ambition and achieve sustainable development goals considering actions all the way from the farm to the national scale. الإنتاج الحيواني هو مصدر محوري للدخل وانبعاثات غازات الدفيئة الزراعية في كولومبيا والبرازيل والأرجنتين وكوستاريكا وأوروغواي والمكسيك وبيرو. تم تقييم العديد من خيارات الإدارة والخيارات التكنولوجية، مع إمكانية تخفيف الميثان المعوي، ومن المتوقع أن يساهم قياسها في تحقيق أهداف خفض انبعاثات غازات الدفيئة. ومع ذلك، لا يزال الاعتماد الواسع النطاق لخيارات التخفيف الواعدة محدودًا، مما يثير تساؤلات حول ما إذا كانت أهداف خفض الانبعاثات المتوخاة قابلة للتحقيق. باستخدام البيانات التي تم إنشاؤها محليًا، نستكشف إمكانات التخفيف من التقنيات وممارسات الإدارة المقترحة حاليًا للتخفيف من انبعاثات الميثان المعوية، لأنظمة إنتاج الماشية في البلدان ذات الانبعاثات الأعلى في أمريكا اللاتينية. ثم نناقش العوائق التي تحول دون اعتماد الابتكارات التي تقلل بشكل كبير من انبعاثات الميثان المعوي القائم على الماشية والتحولات الرئيسية في السياسات والممارسات اللازمة لرفع الطموحات الوطنية في البلدان ذات الانبعاثات العالية. باستخدام أحدث العلوم والتفكير الحالي، نقدم وجهة نظرنا حول نهج شامل ونعيد تصور كيف يمكن للقطاعات الأكاديمية والبحثية وقطاع الأعمال والسياسة العامة دعم وتحفيز التغييرات اللازمة لرفع مستوى الطموح وتحقيق أهداف التنمية المستدامة مع الأخذ في الاعتبار الإجراءات على طول الطريق من المزرعة إلى النطاق الوطني.
CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2020License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108246Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3389/fsufs.2020.00065&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 44 citations 44 popularity Top 1% influence Top 10% impulse Top 1% Powered by BIP!
more_vert CGIAR CGSpace (Consu... arrow_drop_down CGIAR CGSpace (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)Article . 2020License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108246Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsArticle . 2020 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3389/fsufs.2020.00065&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu