• Energy Research

AbstractSmallholder farmers face many challenges to improve their livelihoods and food security. Intensification of agricultural production can help to achieve these goals. Yet farmers are highly heterogenous in their strategies towards intensification, potentially following unsustainable intensification pathways. Using Q Methodology, we ascertain different strategies regarding farm improvement and intensification of smallholder farmers in the Dedza and Ntcheu Extension Planning Areas in Central Malawi. These strategies were associated to coherent sequential choices as expressed in “managerial intensification pathways” (MIPs). Three main strategies emerged: Seed Saving Peasants, Aspirant Modern Farmers and Entrepreneurial Business(wo)men. These were subsequently linked to four MIPs. Seed Saving Peasants focus strongly on local seed systems and post-harvest protection of grains, but also allocate more labour to improving crop residue use and manure quality, thus pointing to a labour-oriented MIP. Aspirant Modern Farmers willingly adopt hybrid seeds and inorganic fertilizers but require more extension support; these farmers follow a technology-oriented MIP. Entrepreneurial Business(wo)men are early adopters of new technologies and benefit from improved access to market information and suppliers of new technologies and follow a sustainable technology-based or techno-ecological intensification pathway. This study shows that strongly contrasting perspectives on intensification exist among smallholders and it is expected that their preferred intensification choices will have diverging impacts on the sustainability of their farms. A diversity of extension, advice and incentive instruments will be needed to support farmer decision making towards sustainably intensified farms.

summaryRoot architectural plasticity might be an important factor in the acquisition by plants of immobile nutrients such as phosphorus (P). In this study, we examined the effect of P availability on the orientation of basal roots with respect to gravity, and thereby on the growth angle of these roots of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In one set of studies the growth angle of basal roots of bean seedlings was measured over time. Sixteen bean genotypes were examined; six showed a decrease in root orientation with respect to gravity m low P media, one increased orientation, and nine showed no difference within 5 d of basal root emergenece. Bean taproots also showed decreased root orientation with respect to gravity in law P. Growth angle after 5 d was correlated with field performance of contrasting genotypes to low P tropical soils. Mineral deficiencies other than P did not cause changes in root angle. In a. split pouch system that provided high or low P solution to different parts of the root system, the decrease in root angle in low P was found to be a response to globat P availability, and not local to the portion of the root system in low P, Effects of P availability on root angle were associated with reduced shoot P concentration, but preceded effects on plant biomass accumulation and leaf area expansion. Results from growth pouches for genotype G 19833 were confirmed using a solid‐phase buffered sand‐culture system supplying P at three levels. Pea (Pisum sativum), soybean (Glycine max Williams), chickpea Cicer arietinum), lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), and lentil (Lens culinaris) were grown with and without P; soybean and pea also showed decreased basal rout angles m low P.

Concerns about energy security and climate change have increased biofuel demand, particularly ethanol produced from cellulosic feedstocks (e.g., food crop residues). A central challenge to cropping for cellulosic ethanol is the potential environmental damage from increased fertilizer use. Previous analyses have assumed that cropping for carbohydrate in residue will require the same amount of fertilizer as cropping for grain. Using (13)C nuclear magnetic resonance, we show that increases in biomass in response to fertilization are not uniform across biochemical classes (carbohydrate, protein, lipid, lignin) or tissues (leaf and stem, grain, reproductive support). Although corn grain responds vigorously and nonlinearly, corn residue shows only modest increases in carbohydrate yields in response to high levels of fertilization (25% increase with 202 kg N ha(-1)). Lignin yields in the residue increased almost twice as much as carbohydrate yields in response to nitrogen, implying that residue feedstock quality declines as more fertilizer is applied. Fertilization also increases the decomposability of corn residue, implying that soil carbon sequestration becomes less efficient with increased fertilizer. Our results suggest that even when corn is grown for grain, benefits of fertilization decline rapidly after the ecosystem's N demands are met. Heavy application of fertilizer yields minimal grain benefits and almost no benefits in residue carbohydrates, while degrading the cellulosic ethanol feedstock quality and soil carbon sequestration capacity.

In Rwanda, farmers’ traditional farming systems based on inter cropping and varietal mixtures are designed to meet a variety of livelihood objectives and withstand risks associated with fluctuation in market and agro-climatic conditions. However, these mixed systems have been disappearing since 2008 when government mandated intensification strategies. In this paper we use a mixed methods approach to evaluate inter cropping and sole cropping systems against farmers’ criteria for success: yield, market value, contribution to nutritional quality, and land-use efficiency. We used qualitative interviews to understand the criteria by which farmers evaluate cropping systems, and data from crop trials to assess common bean ((Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and maize (Zea mays L.)) sole crops and inter crops against those criteria. We found that an improved inter cropping system tends to outperform the government-mandated system of alternating sole-cropped bean and maize season-by-season, on all four of the criteria tested. Although Rwanda’s agricultural intensification strategy aims to improve rural livelihoods through agricultural modernization, it fails to acknowledge the multiple and currently non-replaceable benefits that diverse cropping systems provide, particularly food security and risk management. Agricultural policies need to be based on a better understanding of smallholders’ objectives and constraints. Efforts to improve farming systems require innovative and inclusive approaches that enable adaptation to the socio-ecological context.

The prospect of biofuel production on a large scale has focused attention on energy efficiencies associated with different agricultural systems and production goals. We used 17 years of detailed data on agricultural practices and yields to calculate an energy balance for different cropping systems under both food and fuel scenarios. We compared four grain and one forage systems in the U.S. Midwest: corn (Zea mays) - soybean (Glycine max) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) rotations managed with (1) conventional tillage, (2) no till, (3) low chemical input, and (4) biologically based (organic) practices, and (5) continuous alfalfa (Medicago sativa). We compared energy balances under two scenarios: all harvestable biomass used for food versus all harvestable biomass used for biofuel production. Among the annual grain crops, average energy costs of farming for the different systems ranged from 4.8 GJ ha(-1) y(-1) for the organic system to 7.1 GJ ha(-1) y(-1) for the conventional; the no-till system was also low at 4.9 GJ ha(-1) y(-1) and the low-chemical input system intermediate (5.2 GJ ha(-1) y(-1)). For each system, the average energy output for food was always greater than that for fuel. Overall energy efficiencies ranged from output:input ratios of 10 to 16 for conventional and no-till food production and from 7 to 11 for conventional and no-till fuel production, respectively. Alfalfa for fuel production had an efficiency similar to that of no-till grain production for fuel. Our analysis points to a more energetically efficient use of cropland for food than for fuel production and large differences in efficiencies attributable to management, which suggests multiple opportunities for improvement.

This study aims to assess spatial patterns of Malawian agricultural productivity trends to elucidate the influence of weather and edaphic properties on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) seasonal time series data over a decade (2006–2017). Spatially-located positive trends in the time series that can’t otherwise be accounted for are considered as evidence of farmer management and agricultural intensification. A second set of data provides further insights, using spatial distribution of farmer reported maize yield, inorganic and organic inputs use, and farmer reported soil quality information from the Malawi Integrated Household Survey (IHS3) and (IHS4), implemented between 2010–2011 and 2016–2017, respectively. Overall, remote-sensing identified areas of intensifying agriculture as not fully explained by biophysical drivers. Further, productivity trends for maize crop across Malawi show a decreasing trend over a decade (2006–2017). This is consistent with survey data, as national farmer reported yields showed low yields across Malawi, where 61% (2010–11) and 69% (2016–17) reported yields as being less than 1000 Kilograms/Hectare. Yields were markedly low in the southern region of Malawi, similar to remote sensing observations. Our generalized models provide contextual information for stakeholders on sustainability of productivity and can assist in targeting resources in needed areas. More in-depth research would improve detection of drivers of agricultural variability.

Les événements extrêmes, tels que ceux causés par le changement climatique, les chocs économiques ou géopolitiques et les épidémies de ravageurs ou de maladies, menacent la sécurité alimentaire mondiale. La complexité de la causalité, ainsi que la myriade de façons dont un événement, ou une séquence d'événements, crée des impacts en cascade et systémiques, posent des défis importants à la recherche sur les systèmes alimentaires et aux politiques. Pour identifier les risques prioritaires pour la sécurité alimentaire et les opportunités de recherche, nous avons demandé à des experts de divers domaines et régions géographiques de décrire les principales menaces pour la sécurité alimentaire mondiale au cours des deux prochaines décennies et de suggérer des questions et des lacunes de recherche clés sur ce sujet. Nous présentons ici une hiérarchisation des menaces à la sécurité alimentaire mondiale résultant d'événements extrêmes, ainsi que des questions de recherche émergentes qui mettent en évidence les défis conceptuels et pratiques qui existent dans la conception, l'adoption et la gouvernance de systèmes alimentaires résilients. Nous espérons que ces résultats aideront à orienter le financement de la recherche et les ressources vers les transformations du système alimentaire nécessaires pour aider la société à faire face aux principaux risques du système alimentaire et à l'insécurité alimentaire en cas d'événements extrêmes. Los eventos extremos, como los causados por el cambio climático, las crisis económicas o geopolíticas y las epidemias de plagas o enfermedades, amenazan la seguridad alimentaria mundial. La complejidad de la causalidad, así como las innumerables formas en que un evento, o una secuencia de eventos, crea impactos en cascada y sistémicos, plantea desafíos significativos para la investigación y las políticas de los sistemas alimentarios por igual. Para identificar los riesgos prioritarios para la seguridad alimentaria y las oportunidades de investigación, pedimos a expertos de una variedad de campos y geografías que describieran las amenazas clave para la seguridad alimentaria mundial en las próximas dos décadas y que sugirieran preguntas y brechas clave de investigación sobre este tema. Aquí, presentamos una priorización de las amenazas a la seguridad alimentaria mundial derivadas de eventos extremos, así como preguntas de investigación emergentes que resaltan los desafíos conceptuales y prácticos que existen para diseñar, adoptar y gobernar sistemas alimentarios resilientes. Esperamos que estos hallazgos ayuden a dirigir la financiación de la investigación y los recursos hacia las transformaciones del sistema alimentario necesarias para ayudar a la sociedad a abordar los principales riesgos del sistema alimentario y la inseguridad alimentaria en situaciones extremas. Extreme events, such as those caused by climate change, economic or geopolitical shocks, and pest or disease epidemics, threaten global food security. The complexity of causation, as well as the myriad ways that an event, or a sequence of events, creates cascading and systemic impacts, poses significant challenges to food systems research and policy alike. To identify priority food security risks and research opportunities, we asked experts from a range of fields and geographies to describe key threats to global food security over the next two decades and to suggest key research questions and gaps on this topic. Here, we present a prioritization of threats to global food security from extreme events, as well as emerging research questions that highlight the conceptual and practical challenges that exist in designing, adopting, and governing resilient food systems. We hope that these findings help in directing research funding and resources toward food system transformations needed to help society tackle major food system risks and food insecurity under extreme events. وتهدد الأحداث المتطرفة، مثل تلك الناجمة عن تغير المناخ والصدمات الاقتصادية أو الجيوسياسية وأوبئة الآفات أو الأمراض، الأمن الغذائي العالمي. إن تعقيد السببية، فضلاً عن الطرق التي لا تعد ولا تحصى التي يخلق بها الحدث، أو سلسلة من الأحداث، تأثيرات متتالية ومنهجية، تشكل تحديات كبيرة لبحوث وسياسات النظم الغذائية على حد سواء. لتحديد مخاطر الأمن الغذائي ذات الأولوية وفرص البحث، طلبنا من خبراء من مجموعة من المجالات والمناطق الجغرافية وصف التهديدات الرئيسية للأمن الغذائي العالمي على مدى العقدين المقبلين واقتراح أسئلة وثغرات بحثية رئيسية حول هذا الموضوع. هنا، نقدم أولوية للتهديدات التي يتعرض لها الأمن الغذائي العالمي من الأحداث المتطرفة، بالإضافة إلى أسئلة البحث الناشئة التي تسلط الضوء على التحديات المفاهيمية والعملية الموجودة في تصميم وتبني وإدارة النظم الغذائية المرنة. نأمل أن تساعد هذه النتائج في توجيه تمويل البحوث والموارد نحو تحولات النظام الغذائي اللازمة لمساعدة المجتمع على معالجة المخاطر الرئيسية للنظام الغذائي وانعدام الأمن الغذائي في ظل الأحداث المتطرفة.