

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
CESM2 Idealized Experiment Output: Summer atmospheric response to zero May North American snow cover
{"references": ["Bogenschutz, P. A., A. Gettelman, C. Hannay, V. E. Larson, R. B. Neale, C. Craig, and C.-C. Chen (2018), The path to CAM6: Coupled simulations with CAM5.4 and CAM5.5, Geoscientific Model Development, 11, 235-255, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-235-2018.", "Danabasoglu, G., J.\u2010F. Lamarque, J. Bacmeister, D. A. Bailey, A. K. DuVivier, J. Edwards, et al. (2020), The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2019MS001916. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916.", "Hurrell, J. W., J. J. Hack, D. Shea, J. M. Caron, and J. Rosinski (2008), A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model, Journal of Climate, 21, 5145-5153, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2292.1.", "Lawrence, D. M., R. A. Fisher, C. D. Koven, K. W. Oleson, S. C. Swenson, G. Bonan, et al. (2019), The Community Land Model version 5: Description of new features, benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, 4245-4287, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583."]}
The National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Community Earth System Model version 2.2 (CESM2) (Danabasoglu et al., 2020) was run in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) configuration. SSTs and sea-ice were prescribed as monthly varying seasonal cycles based on the observed climatology from 2005 to 2015 (i.e., component set: F2010climo) (Hurrell et al., 2008). We employed the Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6) (Bogenschutz et al., 2018) as the atmospheric component and the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5) (Lawrence et al., 2019) as the land-surface component. Each model was run with a horizontal resolution of 0.9˚ latitude by 1.25˚ longitude. We ran a control simulation in this configuration for ten consecutive years. We then modified the land-surface restart files for May 1st of each year by reducing the snow cover over North America to zero. Using these modified files, we then completed a reduced snow simulation by rerunning three-month simulations from May through July for each of the ten years.
- King’s University United States
- University of Georgia Research Foundation United States
- Georgia State University United States
- University of Georgia Georgia
- Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory United States
Climate Change, Earth System Models, Surface-Atmosphere Coupling, Snow Cover, GCM
Climate Change, Earth System Models, Surface-Atmosphere Coupling, Snow Cover, GCM
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average visibility views 30 - 30views
Data source Views Downloads ZENODO 30 0

