- home
- Search
- Energy Research
- 2021-2025
- engineering and technology
- OceanRep
- Energy Research
- 2021-2025
- engineering and technology
- OceanRep
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 GermanyPublisher:MDPI AG Funded by:EC | MARCANEC| MARCANAuthors: Michele De Biase; Francesco Chidichimo; Mario Maiolo; Aaron Micallef;doi: 10.3390/w13213046
The effects of changes in climate predicted for 2100—reduction in recharge, increase in water demand and sea-level rise—on groundwater volume and saltwater intrusion have been quantified in the Maltese Islands, an archipelago located at the center of the Mediterranean Sea. A three-dimensional density dependent and heterogeneous model, working in transient conditions, was developed based on morphological and geological information. The hydraulic conductivity and porosity of the lithological formations were derived from previous tests and studies conducted on the islands. The complex fault system intersecting the area has also been included in the model. The results show that among the three considered factors affecting groundwater resources, the most significant is the increase in water demand, which is closely followed by the decrease in groundwater recharge. Sea-level rise plays a marginal role. The 80-year simulation period showed that these combined impacts would cause a loss of more than 16% of groundwater volume.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/w13213046&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/w13213046&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 Germany, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:EC | STEMM-CCSEC| STEMM-CCSStefan Sommer; María Martínez-Cabanas; Klaus Wallmann; Kevin Saw; Anita Flohr; Anita Flohr; Jack Triest; Andrew W. Dale; Dirk Koopmans; Jonathan M. Bull; Joseph Fone; Ben Roche; Robin Brown; Jonas Gros; Peter Linke; James A. Strong; Mark Schmidt; Mario Esposito; Saskia Dötsch;Abstract According to many prognostic scenarios by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a scaling-up of carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage (CCS) by several orders-of-magnitude is necessary to meet the target of ≤2 °C global warming by 2100 relative to preindustrial levels. Since a large fraction of the predicted CO2 storage capacity lies offshore, there is a pressing need to develop field-tested methods to detect and quantify potential leaks in the marine environment. Here, we combine field measurements with numerical models to determine the flow rate of a controlled release of CO2 in a shallow marine setting at about 119 m water depth in the North Sea. In this experiment, CO2 was injected into the sediment at 3 m depth at 143 kg d-1. The new leakage monitoring tool predicts that 91 kg d-1 of CO2 escaped across the seafloor, and that 51 kg d-1 of CO2 were retained in the sediment, in agreement with independent field estimates. The new approach relies mostly on field data collected from ship-deployed technology (towed sensors, Acoustic Doppler current profiler—ADCP), which makes it a promising tool to monitor existing and upcoming offshore CO2 storage sites and to detect and quantify potential CO2 leakage.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103387&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 28visibility views 28 download downloads 57 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103387&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 United Kingdom, United Kingdom, GermanyPublisher:Elsevier BV Anita Flohr; Anita Flohr; Soeren Ahmerkamp; Dirk de Beer; Marit R. van Erk; Moritz Holtappels; Anna Lichtschlag; Matthias Haeckel; James Asa Strong;Abstract We investigated the effect of an artificial CO2 vent (0.0015−0.037 mol s−1), simulating a leak from a reservoir for carbon capture and storage (CCS), on the sediment geochemistry. CO2 was injected 3 m deep into the seafloor at 120 m depth. With increasing mass flow an increasing number of vents were observed, distributed over an area of approximately 3 m. In situ profiling with microsensors for pH, T, O2 and ORP showed the geochemical effects are localized in a small area around the vents and highly variable. In measurements remote from the vent, the pH reached a value of 7.6 at a depth of 0.06 m. In a CO2 venting channel, pH reduced to below 5. Steep temperature profiles were indicative of a heat source inside the sediment. Elevated total alkalinity and Ca2+ levels showed calcite dissolution. Venting decreased sulfate reduction rates, but not aerobic respiration. A transport-reaction model confirmed that a large fraction of the injected CO2 is transported laterally into the sediment and that the reactions between CO2 and sediment generate enough heat to elevate the temperature significantly. A CO2 leak will have only local consequences for sediment biogeochemistry, and only a small fraction of the escaped CO2 will reach the sediment surface.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefElectronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103244&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 26visibility views 26 download downloads 31 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefElectronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103244&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2023 GermanyPublisher:Frontiers Media SA Funded by:EC | MARCANEC| MARCANDe Biase, Michele; Chidichimo, Francesco; Micallef, Aaron; Cohen, Denis; Gable, Carl; Zwinger, Thomas;Offshore freshened groundwater (OFG) is groundwater with a salinity below that of seawater that is stored in sub-seafloor sediments and rocks. OFG has been proposed as an alternative solution to relieve water scarcity in coastal regions and to enhance oil recovery. Although OFG has been documented in most continental margins, we still have a poor understanding of the extent and flow characteristics of OFG systems, and their evolution through time. In view of the general absence of appropriate field data, paleohydrogeological models have been used. The majority of these models are based on 2D approaches, and they rarely consider the future evolution of OFG systems, especially in response to predicted climate change. Here we utilize recently acquired geological, geophysical and hydrogeological data from onshore and offshore the Maltese Islands, and employ 2D and 3D numerical models, to: (i) reconstruct the evolution of the onshore-offshore groundwater system during the last 188 ka, (ii) predict the evolution of the OFG system in response to climate-related changes. We show that the mechanisms emplacing OFG include a combination of active meteoric recharge at present as well as at sea-level lowstands. The Maltese onshore-offshore groundwater system is relatively dynamic, with 23% of groundwater being preserved in the last 18 ka. The control of geology is expressed by the more prevalent distribution of OFG north of the Great Fault, which is associated to the occurrence of low permeability units, and the asymmetry of the groundwater lens during the 18 ka lowstand. A 30% decrease in recharge predicted in the coming 100 years will diminish OFG extent by 38%, whereas sea-level rise will play a negligible role. At present the estimated volume of OFG is 1 km3, which could potentially provide an alternative supply of potable water to the Maltese Islands for 75 years. Exploitation of OFG with minimal salinization of onshore groundwater bodies would require locating pumping wells close to the coast.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3389/frwa.2022.1068971&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 3 citations 3 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3389/frwa.2022.1068971&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 GermanyPublisher:MDPI AG Authors: Elke Kossel; Nikolaus K. Bigalke; Christian Deusner; Matthias Haeckel;doi: 10.3390/en14061763
The exchange of CH4 by CO2 in gas hydrates is of interest for the production of natural gas from methane hydrate with net zero climate gas balance, and for managing risks that are related to sediment destabilization and mobilization after gas-hydrate dissociation. Several experimental studies on the dynamics and efficiency of the process exist, but the results seem to be partly inconsistent. We used confocal Raman spectroscopy to map an area of several tens to hundreds µm of a CH4 hydrate sample during its exposure to liquid and gaseous CO2. On this scale, we could identify and follow different processes in the sample that occur in parallel. Next to guest-molecule exchange, gas-hydrate dissociation also contributes to the release of CH4. During our examination period, about 50% of the CO2 was bound by exchange for CH4 molecules, while the other half was bound by new formation of CO2 hydrates. We evaluated single gas-hydrate grains with confirmed gas exchange and applied a diffusion equation to quantify the process. Obtained diffusion coefficients are in the range of 10−13–10−18 m2/s. We propose to use this analytical diffusion equation for a simple and robust modeling of CH4 production by guest-molecule exchange and to combine it with an additional term for gas-hydrate dissociation.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/en14061763&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/en14061763&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022 United Kingdom, Norway, Norway, Germany, United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:EC | STEMM-CCSEC| STEMM-CCSD.P. Connelly; J.M. Bull; A. Flohr; A. Schaap; D. Koopmans; J.C. Blackford; P.R. White; R.H. James; C. Pearce; A. Lichtschlag; E.P. Achterberg; D. de Beer; B. Roche; J. Li; K. Saw; G. Alendal; H. Avlesen; R. Brown; S.M. Borisov; C. Böttner; P.W. Cazenave; B. Chen; A.W. Dale; M. Dean; M. Dewar; M. Esposito; J. Gros; R. Hanz; M. Haeckel; B. Hosking; V. Huvenne; J. Karstens; T. Le Bas; T.G. Leighton; P. Linke; S. Loucaides; J.M. Matter; S. Monk; M.C. Mowlem; A. Oleynik; A.M. Omar; K. Peel; G. Provenzano; U. Saleem; M. Schmidt; B. Schramm; S. Sommer; J. Strong; I. Falcon Suarez; B. Ungerboeck; S. Widdicombe; H. Wright; E. Yakushev;handle: 11250/3023870 , 11250/3025167
Highlights • An artificial CO2 release demonstrated MMV techniques for offshore CCS. • Detection of leakage was demonstrated using acoustic, chemical and physical approaches. • Attribution of leakage was proved possible using artificial and natural tracer compounds. • Leakage quantification was possible using approaches not previously applied to CCS studies. • Non-catastrophic leaks were detected at levels below those that would cause environmental harm. Carbon capture and storage is a key mitigation strategy proposed for keeping the global temperature rise below 1.5 °C. Offshore storage can provide up to 13% of the global CO2 reduction required to achieve the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change goals. The public must be assured that potential leakages from storage reservoirs can be detected and that therefore the CO2 is safely contained. We conducted a controlled release of 675 kg CO2 within sediments at 120 m water depth, to simulate a leak and test novel detection, quantification and attribution approaches. We show that even at a very low release rate (6 kg day−1), CO2 can be detected within sediments and in the water column. Alongside detection we show the fluxes of both dissolved and gaseous CO2 can be quantified. The CO2 source was verified using natural and added tracers. The experiment demonstrates that existing technologies and techniques can detect, attribute and quantify any escape of CO2 from sub-seabed reservoirs as required for public assurance, regulatory oversight and emissions trading schemes.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)NORCE vitenarkiv (Norwegian Research Centre)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3023870Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3025167Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.rser.2022.112670&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 134visibility views 134 download downloads 61 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)NORCE vitenarkiv (Norwegian Research Centre)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3023870Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3025167Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.rser.2022.112670&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022 Australia, GermanyPublisher:CSIRO Publishing Funded by:ARC | Linkage Projects - Grant ..., ARC | Linkage Projects - Grant ...ARC| Linkage Projects - Grant ID: LP160100073 ,ARC| Linkage Projects - Grant ID: LP200100406C. Mackallah; M. A. Chamberlain; R. M. Law; M. Dix; T. Ziehn; D. Bi; R. Bodman; J. R. Brown; P. Dobrohotoff; K. Druken; B. Evans; I. N. Harman; H. Hayashida; R. Holmes; A. E. Kiss; A. Lenton; Y. Liu; S. Marsland; K. Meissner; L. Menviel; S. O’Farrell; H. A. Rashid; S. Ridzwan; A. Savita; J. Srbinovsky; A. Sullivan; C. Trenham; P. F. Vohralik; Y.-P. Wang; G. Williams; M. T. Woodhouse; N. Yeung;doi: 10.1071/es21031
handle: 11343/318099
The Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) has contributed to the World Climate Research Programme’s Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) using two fully coupled model versions (ACCESS-CM2 and ACCESS-ESM1.5) and two ocean–sea-ice model versions (1° and 0.25° resolution versions of ACCESS-OM2). The fully coupled models differ primarily in the configuration and version of their atmosphere components (including the aerosol scheme), with smaller differences in their sea-ice and land model versions. Additionally, ACCESS-ESM1.5 includes biogeochemistry in the land and ocean components and can be run with an interactive carbon cycle. CMIP6 comprises core experiments and associated thematic Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs). This paper provides an overview of the CMIP6 submission, including the methods used for the preparation of input forcing datasets and the post-processing of model output, along with a comprehensive list of experiments performed, detailing their initialisation, duration, ensemble number and computational cost. A small selection of model output is presented, focusing on idealised experiments and their variants at global scale. Differences in the climate simulation of the two coupled models are highlighted. ACCESS-CM2 produces a larger equilibrium climate sensitivity (4.7°C) than ACCESS-ESM1.5 (3.9°C), likely a result of updated atmospheric parameterisation in recent versions of the atmospheric component of ACCESS-CM2. The idealised experiments run with ACCESS-ESM1.5 show that land and ocean carbon fluxes respond to both changing atmospheric CO2 and to changing temperature. ACCESS data submitted to CMIP6 are available from the Earth System Grid Federation (https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2281 and https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2288). The information provided in this paper should facilitate easier use of these significant datasets by the broader climate community.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down The University of Melbourne: Digital RepositoryArticle . 2022License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/318099Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems ScienceArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1071/es21031&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down The University of Melbourne: Digital RepositoryArticle . 2022License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/318099Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems ScienceArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1071/es21031&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 Germany, United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Dirk Koopmans; Volker Meyer; Allison Schaap; Marius Dewar; Paul Färber; Matthew Long; Jonas Gros; Douglas Connelly; Moritz Holtappels;handle: 1912/27958
Abstract We detected a controlled release of CO2 (g) with pH eddy covariance. We quantified CO2 emission using measurements of water velocity and pH in the plume of aqueous CO2 generated by the bubble streams, and using model predictions of vertical CO2 dissolution and its dispersion downstream. CO2 (g) was injected 3 m below the floor of the North Sea at rates of 5.7–143 kg d − 1. Instruments were 2.6 m from the center of the bubble streams. In the absence of injected CO2, pH eddy covariance quantified the proton flux due to naturally-occurring benthic organic matter mineralization (equivalent to a dissolved inorganic carbon flux of 7.6 ± 3.3 mmol m − 2 d − 1, s.e., n = 33). At the lowest injection rate, the proton flux due to CO2 dissolution was 20-fold greater than this. To accurately quantify emission, the kinetics of the carbonate system had to be accounted for. At the peak injection rate, 73 ± 13% (s.d.) of the injected CO2 was emitted, but when kinetics were neglected, the calculated CO2 emission was one-fifth of this. Our results demonstrate that geochemical techniques can detect and quantify very small seafloor sources of CO2 and attribute them to natural or abiotic origins.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Woods Hole Open Access ServerArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103476Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefElectronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103476&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 12 citations 12 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 14visibility views 14 download downloads 7 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Woods Hole Open Access ServerArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103476Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefElectronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103476&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 Germany, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:UKRI | Characterization of major..., EC | STEMM-CCSUKRI| Characterization of major overburden leakage pathways above sub-seafloor CO2 storage reservoirs in the North Sea (CHIMNEY) ,EC| STEMM-CCSAnna Lichtschlag; Matthias Haeckel; David Olierook; Kate Peel; Anita Flohr; Christopher R. Pearce; Chiara Marieni; Rachael H. James; Douglas P. Connelly;Abstract Sub-seabed geological CO2 storage is discussed as a climate mitigation strategy, but the impact of any leakage of stored CO2 into the marine environment is not well known. In this study, leakage from a CO2 storage reservoir through near-surface sediments was mimicked for low leakage rates in the North Sea. Field data were combined with laboratory experiments and transport-reaction modelling to estimate CO2 and mineral dissolution rates, and to assess the mobilization of metals in contact with CO2-rich fluids and their potential impact on the environment. We found that carbonate and silicate minerals reacted quickly with the dissolved CO2, increasing porewater alkalinity and neutralizing about 5% of the injected CO2. The release of Ca, Sr, Ba and Mn was mainly controlled by carbonate dissolution, while Fe, Li, B, Mg, and Si were released from silicate minerals, mainly from deeper sediment layers. No toxic metals were released from the sediments and overall the injected CO2 was only detected up to 1 m away from seabed CO2 bubble streams. Our results suggest that low leakage rates of CO2 over short timescales have minimal impact on the benthic environment. However, porewater composition and temperature are effective indicators for leakage detection, even at low CO2 leakage rates.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103352&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 28 citations 28 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 30visibility views 30 download downloads 32 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103352&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, GermanyPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:EC | STEMM-CCSEC| STEMM-CCSAnita Flohr; Juerg M. Matter; Rachael H. James; Kevin Saw; Robin Brown; Jonas Gros; Stephanie Flude; Christopher Day; Kate Peel; Douglas Connelly; Christopher R. Pearce; James A. Strong; Anna Lichtschlag; Darren J. Hillegonds; Christopher J. Ballentine; Rebecca L. Tyne;Abstract To inform cost-effective monitoring of offshore geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2), a unique field experiment, designed to simulate leakage of CO2 from a sub-seafloor storage reservoir, was carried out in the central North Sea. A total of 675 kg of CO2 were released into the shallow sediments (∼3 m below seafloor) for 11 days at flow rates between 6 and 143 kg d-1. A set of natural, inherent tracers (13C, 18O) of injected CO2 and added, non-toxic tracer gases (octafluoropropane, sulfur hexafluoride, krypton, methane) were used to test their applicability for CO2 leakage attribution and quantification in the marine environment. All tracers except 18O were capable of attributing the CO2 source. Tracer analyses indicate that CO2 dissolution in sediment pore waters ranged from 35 % at the lowest injection rate to 41% at the highest injection rate. Direct measurements of gas released from the sediment into the water column suggest that 22 % to 48 % of the injected CO2 exited the seafloor at, respectively, the lowest and the highest injection rate. The remainder of injected CO2 accumulated in gas pockets in the sediment. The methodologies can be used to rapidly confirm the source of leaking CO2 once seabed samples are retrieved.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down StrathprintsArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103421&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 18 citations 18 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 50visibility views 50 download downloads 53 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down StrathprintsArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103421&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
description Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 GermanyPublisher:MDPI AG Funded by:EC | MARCANEC| MARCANAuthors: Michele De Biase; Francesco Chidichimo; Mario Maiolo; Aaron Micallef;doi: 10.3390/w13213046
The effects of changes in climate predicted for 2100—reduction in recharge, increase in water demand and sea-level rise—on groundwater volume and saltwater intrusion have been quantified in the Maltese Islands, an archipelago located at the center of the Mediterranean Sea. A three-dimensional density dependent and heterogeneous model, working in transient conditions, was developed based on morphological and geological information. The hydraulic conductivity and porosity of the lithological formations were derived from previous tests and studies conducted on the islands. The complex fault system intersecting the area has also been included in the model. The results show that among the three considered factors affecting groundwater resources, the most significant is the increase in water demand, which is closely followed by the decrease in groundwater recharge. Sea-level rise plays a marginal role. The 80-year simulation period showed that these combined impacts would cause a loss of more than 16% of groundwater volume.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/w13213046&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/w13213046&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 Germany, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:EC | STEMM-CCSEC| STEMM-CCSStefan Sommer; María Martínez-Cabanas; Klaus Wallmann; Kevin Saw; Anita Flohr; Anita Flohr; Jack Triest; Andrew W. Dale; Dirk Koopmans; Jonathan M. Bull; Joseph Fone; Ben Roche; Robin Brown; Jonas Gros; Peter Linke; James A. Strong; Mark Schmidt; Mario Esposito; Saskia Dötsch;Abstract According to many prognostic scenarios by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a scaling-up of carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage (CCS) by several orders-of-magnitude is necessary to meet the target of ≤2 °C global warming by 2100 relative to preindustrial levels. Since a large fraction of the predicted CO2 storage capacity lies offshore, there is a pressing need to develop field-tested methods to detect and quantify potential leaks in the marine environment. Here, we combine field measurements with numerical models to determine the flow rate of a controlled release of CO2 in a shallow marine setting at about 119 m water depth in the North Sea. In this experiment, CO2 was injected into the sediment at 3 m depth at 143 kg d-1. The new leakage monitoring tool predicts that 91 kg d-1 of CO2 escaped across the seafloor, and that 51 kg d-1 of CO2 were retained in the sediment, in agreement with independent field estimates. The new approach relies mostly on field data collected from ship-deployed technology (towed sensors, Acoustic Doppler current profiler—ADCP), which makes it a promising tool to monitor existing and upcoming offshore CO2 storage sites and to detect and quantify potential CO2 leakage.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103387&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 28visibility views 28 download downloads 57 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103387&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 United Kingdom, United Kingdom, GermanyPublisher:Elsevier BV Anita Flohr; Anita Flohr; Soeren Ahmerkamp; Dirk de Beer; Marit R. van Erk; Moritz Holtappels; Anna Lichtschlag; Matthias Haeckel; James Asa Strong;Abstract We investigated the effect of an artificial CO2 vent (0.0015−0.037 mol s−1), simulating a leak from a reservoir for carbon capture and storage (CCS), on the sediment geochemistry. CO2 was injected 3 m deep into the seafloor at 120 m depth. With increasing mass flow an increasing number of vents were observed, distributed over an area of approximately 3 m. In situ profiling with microsensors for pH, T, O2 and ORP showed the geochemical effects are localized in a small area around the vents and highly variable. In measurements remote from the vent, the pH reached a value of 7.6 at a depth of 0.06 m. In a CO2 venting channel, pH reduced to below 5. Steep temperature profiles were indicative of a heat source inside the sediment. Elevated total alkalinity and Ca2+ levels showed calcite dissolution. Venting decreased sulfate reduction rates, but not aerobic respiration. A transport-reaction model confirmed that a large fraction of the injected CO2 is transported laterally into the sediment and that the reactions between CO2 and sediment generate enough heat to elevate the temperature significantly. A CO2 leak will have only local consequences for sediment biogeochemistry, and only a small fraction of the escaped CO2 will reach the sediment surface.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefElectronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103244&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 26visibility views 26 download downloads 31 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: CrossrefElectronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103244&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2023 GermanyPublisher:Frontiers Media SA Funded by:EC | MARCANEC| MARCANDe Biase, Michele; Chidichimo, Francesco; Micallef, Aaron; Cohen, Denis; Gable, Carl; Zwinger, Thomas;Offshore freshened groundwater (OFG) is groundwater with a salinity below that of seawater that is stored in sub-seafloor sediments and rocks. OFG has been proposed as an alternative solution to relieve water scarcity in coastal regions and to enhance oil recovery. Although OFG has been documented in most continental margins, we still have a poor understanding of the extent and flow characteristics of OFG systems, and their evolution through time. In view of the general absence of appropriate field data, paleohydrogeological models have been used. The majority of these models are based on 2D approaches, and they rarely consider the future evolution of OFG systems, especially in response to predicted climate change. Here we utilize recently acquired geological, geophysical and hydrogeological data from onshore and offshore the Maltese Islands, and employ 2D and 3D numerical models, to: (i) reconstruct the evolution of the onshore-offshore groundwater system during the last 188 ka, (ii) predict the evolution of the OFG system in response to climate-related changes. We show that the mechanisms emplacing OFG include a combination of active meteoric recharge at present as well as at sea-level lowstands. The Maltese onshore-offshore groundwater system is relatively dynamic, with 23% of groundwater being preserved in the last 18 ka. The control of geology is expressed by the more prevalent distribution of OFG north of the Great Fault, which is associated to the occurrence of low permeability units, and the asymmetry of the groundwater lens during the 18 ka lowstand. A 30% decrease in recharge predicted in the coming 100 years will diminish OFG extent by 38%, whereas sea-level rise will play a negligible role. At present the estimated volume of OFG is 1 km3, which could potentially provide an alternative supply of potable water to the Maltese Islands for 75 years. Exploitation of OFG with minimal salinization of onshore groundwater bodies would require locating pumping wells close to the coast.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3389/frwa.2022.1068971&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 3 citations 3 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Average Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3389/frwa.2022.1068971&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 GermanyPublisher:MDPI AG Authors: Elke Kossel; Nikolaus K. Bigalke; Christian Deusner; Matthias Haeckel;doi: 10.3390/en14061763
The exchange of CH4 by CO2 in gas hydrates is of interest for the production of natural gas from methane hydrate with net zero climate gas balance, and for managing risks that are related to sediment destabilization and mobilization after gas-hydrate dissociation. Several experimental studies on the dynamics and efficiency of the process exist, but the results seem to be partly inconsistent. We used confocal Raman spectroscopy to map an area of several tens to hundreds µm of a CH4 hydrate sample during its exposure to liquid and gaseous CO2. On this scale, we could identify and follow different processes in the sample that occur in parallel. Next to guest-molecule exchange, gas-hydrate dissociation also contributes to the release of CH4. During our examination period, about 50% of the CO2 was bound by exchange for CH4 molecules, while the other half was bound by new formation of CO2 hydrates. We evaluated single gas-hydrate grains with confirmed gas exchange and applied a diffusion equation to quantify the process. Obtained diffusion coefficients are in the range of 10−13–10−18 m2/s. We propose to use this analytical diffusion equation for a simple and robust modeling of CH4 production by guest-molecule exchange and to combine it with an additional term for gas-hydrate dissociation.
add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/en14061763&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert add ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.3390/en14061763&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022 United Kingdom, Norway, Norway, Germany, United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:EC | STEMM-CCSEC| STEMM-CCSD.P. Connelly; J.M. Bull; A. Flohr; A. Schaap; D. Koopmans; J.C. Blackford; P.R. White; R.H. James; C. Pearce; A. Lichtschlag; E.P. Achterberg; D. de Beer; B. Roche; J. Li; K. Saw; G. Alendal; H. Avlesen; R. Brown; S.M. Borisov; C. Böttner; P.W. Cazenave; B. Chen; A.W. Dale; M. Dean; M. Dewar; M. Esposito; J. Gros; R. Hanz; M. Haeckel; B. Hosking; V. Huvenne; J. Karstens; T. Le Bas; T.G. Leighton; P. Linke; S. Loucaides; J.M. Matter; S. Monk; M.C. Mowlem; A. Oleynik; A.M. Omar; K. Peel; G. Provenzano; U. Saleem; M. Schmidt; B. Schramm; S. Sommer; J. Strong; I. Falcon Suarez; B. Ungerboeck; S. Widdicombe; H. Wright; E. Yakushev;handle: 11250/3023870 , 11250/3025167
Highlights • An artificial CO2 release demonstrated MMV techniques for offshore CCS. • Detection of leakage was demonstrated using acoustic, chemical and physical approaches. • Attribution of leakage was proved possible using artificial and natural tracer compounds. • Leakage quantification was possible using approaches not previously applied to CCS studies. • Non-catastrophic leaks were detected at levels below those that would cause environmental harm. Carbon capture and storage is a key mitigation strategy proposed for keeping the global temperature rise below 1.5 °C. Offshore storage can provide up to 13% of the global CO2 reduction required to achieve the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change goals. The public must be assured that potential leakages from storage reservoirs can be detected and that therefore the CO2 is safely contained. We conducted a controlled release of 675 kg CO2 within sediments at 120 m water depth, to simulate a leak and test novel detection, quantification and attribution approaches. We show that even at a very low release rate (6 kg day−1), CO2 can be detected within sediments and in the water column. Alongside detection we show the fluxes of both dissolved and gaseous CO2 can be quantified. The CO2 source was verified using natural and added tracers. The experiment demonstrates that existing technologies and techniques can detect, attribute and quantify any escape of CO2 from sub-seabed reservoirs as required for public assurance, regulatory oversight and emissions trading schemes.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)NORCE vitenarkiv (Norwegian Research Centre)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3023870Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3025167Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.rser.2022.112670&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 11 citations 11 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 134visibility views 134 download downloads 61 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2022License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)NORCE vitenarkiv (Norwegian Research Centre)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3023870Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)Article . 2022License: CC BYFull-Text: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3025167Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.rser.2022.112670&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 2022 Australia, GermanyPublisher:CSIRO Publishing Funded by:ARC | Linkage Projects - Grant ..., ARC | Linkage Projects - Grant ...ARC| Linkage Projects - Grant ID: LP160100073 ,ARC| Linkage Projects - Grant ID: LP200100406C. Mackallah; M. A. Chamberlain; R. M. Law; M. Dix; T. Ziehn; D. Bi; R. Bodman; J. R. Brown; P. Dobrohotoff; K. Druken; B. Evans; I. N. Harman; H. Hayashida; R. Holmes; A. E. Kiss; A. Lenton; Y. Liu; S. Marsland; K. Meissner; L. Menviel; S. O’Farrell; H. A. Rashid; S. Ridzwan; A. Savita; J. Srbinovsky; A. Sullivan; C. Trenham; P. F. Vohralik; Y.-P. Wang; G. Williams; M. T. Woodhouse; N. Yeung;doi: 10.1071/es21031
handle: 11343/318099
The Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) has contributed to the World Climate Research Programme’s Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) using two fully coupled model versions (ACCESS-CM2 and ACCESS-ESM1.5) and two ocean–sea-ice model versions (1° and 0.25° resolution versions of ACCESS-OM2). The fully coupled models differ primarily in the configuration and version of their atmosphere components (including the aerosol scheme), with smaller differences in their sea-ice and land model versions. Additionally, ACCESS-ESM1.5 includes biogeochemistry in the land and ocean components and can be run with an interactive carbon cycle. CMIP6 comprises core experiments and associated thematic Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs). This paper provides an overview of the CMIP6 submission, including the methods used for the preparation of input forcing datasets and the post-processing of model output, along with a comprehensive list of experiments performed, detailing their initialisation, duration, ensemble number and computational cost. A small selection of model output is presented, focusing on idealised experiments and their variants at global scale. Differences in the climate simulation of the two coupled models are highlighted. ACCESS-CM2 produces a larger equilibrium climate sensitivity (4.7°C) than ACCESS-ESM1.5 (3.9°C), likely a result of updated atmospheric parameterisation in recent versions of the atmospheric component of ACCESS-CM2. The idealised experiments run with ACCESS-ESM1.5 show that land and ocean carbon fluxes respond to both changing atmospheric CO2 and to changing temperature. ACCESS data submitted to CMIP6 are available from the Earth System Grid Federation (https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2281 and https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2288). The information provided in this paper should facilitate easier use of these significant datasets by the broader climate community.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down The University of Melbourne: Digital RepositoryArticle . 2022License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/318099Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems ScienceArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1071/es21031&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen gold 6 citations 6 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
more_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down The University of Melbourne: Digital RepositoryArticle . 2022License: CC BY NC NDFull-Text: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/318099Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems ScienceArticle . 2022 . Peer-reviewedData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1071/es21031&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 Germany, United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Dirk Koopmans; Volker Meyer; Allison Schaap; Marius Dewar; Paul Färber; Matthew Long; Jonas Gros; Douglas Connelly; Moritz Holtappels;handle: 1912/27958
Abstract We detected a controlled release of CO2 (g) with pH eddy covariance. We quantified CO2 emission using measurements of water velocity and pH in the plume of aqueous CO2 generated by the bubble streams, and using model predictions of vertical CO2 dissolution and its dispersion downstream. CO2 (g) was injected 3 m below the floor of the North Sea at rates of 5.7–143 kg d − 1. Instruments were 2.6 m from the center of the bubble streams. In the absence of injected CO2, pH eddy covariance quantified the proton flux due to naturally-occurring benthic organic matter mineralization (equivalent to a dissolved inorganic carbon flux of 7.6 ± 3.3 mmol m − 2 d − 1, s.e., n = 33). At the lowest injection rate, the proton flux due to CO2 dissolution was 20-fold greater than this. To accurately quantify emission, the kinetics of the carbonate system had to be accounted for. At the peak injection rate, 73 ± 13% (s.d.) of the injected CO2 was emitted, but when kinetics were neglected, the calculated CO2 emission was one-fifth of this. Our results demonstrate that geochemical techniques can detect and quantify very small seafloor sources of CO2 and attribute them to natural or abiotic origins.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Woods Hole Open Access ServerArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103476Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefElectronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103476&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 12 citations 12 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 14visibility views 14 download downloads 7 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Woods Hole Open Access ServerArticle . 2021License: CC BYFull-Text: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103476Data sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: CrossrefElectronic Publication Information CenterArticle . 2021Data sources: Electronic Publication Information Centeradd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103476&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 Germany, United Kingdom, United KingdomPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:UKRI | Characterization of major..., EC | STEMM-CCSUKRI| Characterization of major overburden leakage pathways above sub-seafloor CO2 storage reservoirs in the North Sea (CHIMNEY) ,EC| STEMM-CCSAnna Lichtschlag; Matthias Haeckel; David Olierook; Kate Peel; Anita Flohr; Christopher R. Pearce; Chiara Marieni; Rachael H. James; Douglas P. Connelly;Abstract Sub-seabed geological CO2 storage is discussed as a climate mitigation strategy, but the impact of any leakage of stored CO2 into the marine environment is not well known. In this study, leakage from a CO2 storage reservoir through near-surface sediments was mimicked for low leakage rates in the North Sea. Field data were combined with laboratory experiments and transport-reaction modelling to estimate CO2 and mineral dissolution rates, and to assess the mobilization of metals in contact with CO2-rich fluids and their potential impact on the environment. We found that carbonate and silicate minerals reacted quickly with the dissolved CO2, increasing porewater alkalinity and neutralizing about 5% of the injected CO2. The release of Ca, Sr, Ba and Mn was mainly controlled by carbonate dissolution, while Fe, Li, B, Mg, and Si were released from silicate minerals, mainly from deeper sediment layers. No toxic metals were released from the sediments and overall the injected CO2 was only detected up to 1 m away from seabed CO2 bubble streams. Our results suggest that low leakage rates of CO2 over short timescales have minimal impact on the benthic environment. However, porewater composition and temperature are effective indicators for leakage detection, even at low CO2 leakage rates.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103352&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 28 citations 28 popularity Top 10% influence Top 10% impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 30visibility views 30 download downloads 32 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BYData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BYData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103352&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eudescription Publicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 2021 United Kingdom, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, GermanyPublisher:Elsevier BV Funded by:EC | STEMM-CCSEC| STEMM-CCSAnita Flohr; Juerg M. Matter; Rachael H. James; Kevin Saw; Robin Brown; Jonas Gros; Stephanie Flude; Christopher Day; Kate Peel; Douglas Connelly; Christopher R. Pearce; James A. Strong; Anna Lichtschlag; Darren J. Hillegonds; Christopher J. Ballentine; Rebecca L. Tyne;Abstract To inform cost-effective monitoring of offshore geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2), a unique field experiment, designed to simulate leakage of CO2 from a sub-seafloor storage reservoir, was carried out in the central North Sea. A total of 675 kg of CO2 were released into the shallow sediments (∼3 m below seafloor) for 11 days at flow rates between 6 and 143 kg d-1. A set of natural, inherent tracers (13C, 18O) of injected CO2 and added, non-toxic tracer gases (octafluoropropane, sulfur hexafluoride, krypton, methane) were used to test their applicability for CO2 leakage attribution and quantification in the marine environment. All tracers except 18O were capable of attributing the CO2 source. Tracer analyses indicate that CO2 dissolution in sediment pore waters ranged from 35 % at the lowest injection rate to 41% at the highest injection rate. Direct measurements of gas released from the sediment into the water column suggest that 22 % to 48 % of the injected CO2 exited the seafloor at, respectively, the lowest and the highest injection rate. The remainder of injected CO2 accumulated in gas pockets in the sediment. The methodologies can be used to rapidly confirm the source of leaking CO2 once seabed samples are retrieved.
OceanRep arrow_drop_down StrathprintsArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103421&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.euAccess RoutesGreen hybrid 18 citations 18 popularity Top 10% influence Average impulse Top 10% Powered by BIP!
visibility 50visibility views 50 download downloads 53 Powered bymore_vert OceanRep arrow_drop_down StrathprintsArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)Natural Environment Research Council: NERC Open Research ArchiveArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)e-Prints SotonArticle . 2021License: CC BY NC NDData sources: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlArticle . 2021 . Peer-reviewedLicense: CC BY NC NDData sources: Crossrefadd ClaimPlease grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.All Research productsarrow_drop_down <script type="text/javascript"> <!-- document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>'); document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103421&type=result"></script>'); --> </script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu