Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.5...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Other ORP type . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Sygma
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Reports on preferred sustainable market solutions: Stakeholder´s perspectives

Authors: Olafsdottir, G.; Sigurdardottir, H.; Eggertsdottir, B.; Bogason, S;

Reports on preferred sustainable market solutions: Stakeholder´s perspectives

Abstract

The goals were to facilitate the building of a co-creation and stakeholder platform to engage various value chain stakeholders in participatory manner and interactions with the SUCCESS partners. Through this enable targeted consulting actions (e.g. workshops, focus groups) with relevant actors like the fishermen, aquaculture producers and their associations, and to engage value chain operators driving the market interactions between primary producers, sellers and the consumers, Following is a list of selected sustainable market perspectives from the SUCCESS co-creation work with stakeholders: Different cultural perspectives exist that may motivate stakeholders differently across Europe, i.e. North vs. South European perspectives, and also differences arising from the Common Fishery Policy (CFP) vs. elsewhere in Europe not covered by the CFP. Many policy options must be assessed at the individual case study level (due to heterogeneity). Data collection improvement is considered important (for e.g. labour, capital structure/lack of market oriented and environmental indicators, and more disaggregated data is needed. Technical efficiency is considered important for improving environmentally friendly fishing methods. Imperative to simplify and improve legal frameworks and regulations, e.g. to reduce conflicts between short term and long term issues and overlap of local regional, national, EU terms of reference. Environmental regulation clarity improvement needed, and better information basis required with focus on spatial management considerations, especially in aquaculture. Consider if ecosystem services provided by e.g. carp aquaculture could be promoted as part of Natura and tourism. 7.Labelling for sustainability, origin and quality schemes remains a complicated issue, resulting in label fatigue, consumer segmentation and country differences that can provide negative or positive impacts. Impacts direction relies on informing consumers properly for informed choices, and implementing measures targeting, or supporting Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to provide transparent information for increasing ocean literacy, Such efforts are also considered important at municipality levels, as well as regional and on EU wide level. 8. Producer Organisations and Cooperatives should be promoted Provide incentives and opportunities through EU legislation, e.g. through allocation of user rights, Value chain and market bargain power promotion through measures like business concentration, both via vertical and horizontal integration, Promote initiatives by SMEs on training. 9. The CFP discard ban will require more work on quota allocation modelling to underpin the optimal way forward for the sector. 10.Promote further energy saving technologies and consider a ban on fuel subsidies for the fishing sector. 11. Promote further work on new products and product differentiation measures (like e.g. the Greece and Trapani mussels label, direct-selling and short supply chains etc.).

Keywords

Stakeholder co-creation, Fishery, Sustainability, Aquaculture, Competitiveness

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average