
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Variability in the sensitivity among model simulations of permafrost and carbon dynamics in the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009

doi: 10.1002/2016gb005405
AbstractA significant portion of the large amount of carbon (C) currently stored in soils of the permafrost region in the Northern Hemisphere has the potential to be emitted as the greenhouse gases CO2 and CH4 under a warmer climate. In this study we evaluated the variability in the sensitivity of permafrost and C in recent decades among land surface model simulations over the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009. The 15 model simulations all predict a loss of near‐surface permafrost (within 3 m) area over the region, but there are large differences in the magnitude of the simulated rates of loss among the models (0.2 to 58.8 × 103 km2 yr−1). Sensitivity simulations indicated that changes in air temperature largely explained changes in permafrost area, although interactions among changes in other environmental variables also played a role. All of the models indicate that both vegetation and soil C storage together have increased by 156 to 954 Tg C yr−1 between 1960 and 2009 over the permafrost region even though model analyses indicate that warming alone would decrease soil C storage. Increases in gross primary production (GPP) largely explain the simulated increases in vegetation and soil C. The sensitivity of GPP to increases in atmospheric CO2 was the dominant cause of increases in GPP across the models, but comparison of simulated GPP trends across the 1982–2009 period with that of a global GPP data set indicates that all of the models overestimate the trend in GPP. Disturbance also appears to be an important factor affecting C storage, as models that consider disturbance had lower increases in C storage than models that did not consider disturbance. To improve the modeling of C in the permafrost region, there is the need for the modeling community to standardize structural representation of permafrost and carbon dynamics among models that are used to evaluate the permafrost C feedback and for the modeling and observational communities to jointly develop data sets and methodologies to more effectively benchmark models.
- Purdue University West Lafayette United States
- University of Copenhagen Denmark
- National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment France
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory United States
- Oklahoma City University United States
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, 550, LAND-SURFACE MODELS, CO2-ENHANCEMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE, Oceanography, climatic changes, Atmospheric Sciences, PERMAFROST, PERMAFROST MODELLING, MODEL SENSITIVITY, XXXXXX - Unknown, Geoinformatics, carbon cycle, Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences, carbon cycle (biogeochemistry), soil carbon, CARBON DYNAMICS, Northern Hemisphere, 500, GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION, sensitivity, carbon sequestration, permafrost carbon feedback, Climate Action, Geochemistry, climate change, Climate change impacts and adaptation, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Earth Sciences, permafrost
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, 550, LAND-SURFACE MODELS, CO2-ENHANCEMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE, Oceanography, climatic changes, Atmospheric Sciences, PERMAFROST, PERMAFROST MODELLING, MODEL SENSITIVITY, XXXXXX - Unknown, Geoinformatics, carbon cycle, Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences, carbon cycle (biogeochemistry), soil carbon, CARBON DYNAMICS, Northern Hemisphere, 500, GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION, sensitivity, carbon sequestration, permafrost carbon feedback, Climate Action, Geochemistry, climate change, Climate change impacts and adaptation, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Earth Sciences, permafrost
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).114 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
