
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Assessing the influence of biofilm surface roughness on mass transfer by combining optical coherence tomography and two‐dimensional modeling

doi: 10.1002/bit.25868
pmid: 26498328
ABSTRACTImaging and modeling are two major approaches in biofilm research to understand the physical and biochemical processes involved in biofilm development. However, they are often used separately. In this study we combined these two approaches to investigate substrate mass transfer and mass flux. Cross‐sectional biofilm images were acquired by means of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for biofilms grown on carriers. A 2D biofilm model was developed incorporating OCT images as well as a simplified biofilm geometry serving as structural templates. The model incorporated fluid flow, substrate transfer and biochemical conversion of substrates and simulated the hydrodynamics surrounding the biofilm structure as well as the substrate distribution. The method allowed detailed analysis of the hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics at the micro‐scale. Biofilm activity with respect to substrate fluxes was compared among different combinations of flow, substrate availability and biomass density. The combined approach revealed that higher substrate fluxes at heterogeneous biofilm surface under two conditions: pure diffusion and when high flow velocity along the biofilms surface renders the whole liquid‐biofilm interface to be highly active. In‐between the two conditions the substrate fluxes across the surface of smooth biofilm geometry were higher than that of the heterogeneous biofilms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 989–1000. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
- Weimar Institute United States
- Bauhaus University, Weimar Germany
- Bauhaus University, Weimar Germany
- Water Technology (Australia) Australia
- Weimar Institute United States
Surface Properties, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Models, Biological, Diffusion, Bioreactors, Biofilms, Hydrodynamics, Biomass, Algorithms, Tomography, Optical Coherence
Surface Properties, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Models, Biological, Diffusion, Bioreactors, Biofilms, Hydrodynamics, Biomass, Algorithms, Tomography, Optical Coherence
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).34 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
