
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Bringing sustainability to life: A framework to guide biodiversity indicator development for business performance management

handle: 10044/1/81004 , 11343/252506
AbstractBiodiversity loss is a critical sustainability issue, and companies are beginning to seek ways to assess their biodiversity performance. Initiatives to date have developed biodiversity indicators for specific business contexts (e.g., spatial scales—from site, to product, to regional, or corporate scales); however, many are not widely translatable across different contexts making it challenging for businesses seeking indicators to manage their biodiversity performance. By synthesising the steps of common conservation and business decision‐making systems, we propose a framework to support more comprehensive development of quantitative biodiversity indicators, for a range of business contexts. The framework integrates experience from existing tried‐and‐tested conservation frameworks. We illustrate how our framework offers a pathway for businesses to assess their biodiversity performance and demonstrate responsible management by mitigating and reversing their biodiversity impacts and sustaining their dependencies, enabling them to demonstrate their contribution to emerging global biodiversity targets (e.g., Convention on Biological Diversity post‐2020 targets).
- University of Kent United Kingdom
- University of Melbourne Australia
- Arizona State University United States
- University College London United Kingdom
- University of Oxford, Department of Zoology United Kingdom
Auditing and Accountability, 330, IMPACT, Environmental Studies, Impact mitigation; Management systems; Metric; Risk management; Sustainability, Social Sciences, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, QH75, 650, risk management, Management systems, 333, 1501 Accounting, Business & Economics, management system, Business, 0502 Environmental Science and Management, Metric, Science & Technology, CHALLENGES, metric, HF5351, 1501 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, sustainability, impact mitigation, Management, MODEL, Impact mitigation, Business & Management, Risk management, Sustainability, 1503 Business and Management, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Auditing and Accountability, 330, IMPACT, Environmental Studies, Impact mitigation; Management systems; Metric; Risk management; Sustainability, Social Sciences, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, QH75, 650, risk management, Management systems, 333, 1501 Accounting, Business & Economics, management system, Business, 0502 Environmental Science and Management, Metric, Science & Technology, CHALLENGES, metric, HF5351, 1501 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, sustainability, impact mitigation, Management, MODEL, Impact mitigation, Business & Management, Risk management, Sustainability, 1503 Business and Management, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).59 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
