
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene

doi: 10.1002/fee.1309
handle: 10568/89870
The scale, rate, and intensity of humans’ environmental impact has engendered broad discussion about how to find plausible pathways of development that hold the most promise for fostering a better future in the Anthropocene. However, the dominance of dystopian visions of irreversible environmental degradation and societal collapse, along with overly optimistic utopias and business‐as‐usual scenarios that lack insight and innovation, frustrate progress. Here, we present a novel approach to thinking about the future that builds on experiences drawn from a diversity of practices, worldviews, values, and regions that could accelerate the adoption of pathways to transformative change (change that goes beyond incremental improvements). Using an analysis of 100 initiatives, or “seeds of a good Anthropocene”, we find that emphasizing hopeful elements of existing practice offers the opportunity to: (1) understand the values and features that constitute a good Anthropocene, (2) determine the processes that lead to the emergence and growth of initiatives that fundamentally change human–environmental relationships, and (3) generate creative, bottom‐up scenarios that feature well‐articulated pathways toward a more positive future.
- CGIAR France
- Chinese Academy of Sciences China (People's Republic of)
- University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh United States
- Stockholm University Sweden
- University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh United States
330, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/nachhaltigkeitswissenschaft; name=Sustainability Science, 710, food security, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1100/1105; name=Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, climate change, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2303; name=Ecology, gender, agriculture
330, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/nachhaltigkeitswissenschaft; name=Sustainability Science, 710, food security, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1100/1105; name=Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, climate change, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2303; name=Ecology, gender, agriculture
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).448 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
