<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: opportunities and trade‐offs

دمج التخفيف من آثار تغير المناخ والتكيف معه في الزراعة والغابات: الفرص والمقايضات

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 09 Sep 2015Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2015 Switzerland, United Kingdom, France, United Kingdom Publisher:WileyJournal:WIREs Climate Change, volume 6, pages 585-598 (issn: 1757-7780, eissn: 1757-7799,

Authors: Bruno Locatelli; Charlotte Pavageau; E. Pramova; Monica Di Gregorio;

doi: 10.1002/wcc.357 , 10.60692/mzs48-98920 , 10.60692/8kf2s-sq029 , 10.3929/ethz-b-000104450

handle: 10568/94684

Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: opportunities and trade‐offs

- Summary
- Subjects
- Related research
  (1)
- Metrics

Abstract

Although many activities can jointly contribute to the climate change strategies of adaptation and mitigation, climate policies have generally treated these strategies separately. In recent years, there has been a growing interest shown by practitioners in agriculture, forestry, and landscape management in the links between the two strategies. This review explores the opportunities and trade‐offs when managing landscapes for both climate change mitigation and adaptation; different conceptualizations of the links between adaptation and mitigation are highlighted. Under a first conceptualization of ‘joint outcomes,’ several reviewed studies analyze how activities without climatic objectives deliver joint adaptation and mitigation outcomes. In a second conceptualization of ‘unintended side effects,’ the focus is on how activities aimed at only one climate objective—either adaptation or mitigation—can deliver outcomes for the other objective. A third conceptualization of ‘joint objectives’ highlights that associating both adaptation and mitigation objectives in a climate‐related activity can influence its outcomes because of multiple possible interactions. The review reveals a diversity of reasons for mainstreaming adaptation and mitigation separately or jointly in landscape management. The three broad conceptualizations of the links between adaptation and mitigation suggest different implications for climate policy mainstreaming and integration. WIREs Clim Change 2015, 6:585–598. doi: 10.1002/wcc.357This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Methods of Integrated Assessment of Climate Change The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Benefits of Mitigation

Countries

Switzerland, United Kingdom, France, United Kingdom

Related Organizations

ETH Zurich
Switzerland
CGIAR Consortium
France
Center for International Forestry Research
Peru
CGIAR
France
White Rose Consortium: University of Leeds; University of Sheffield; University of York
United Kingdom

View all View all

Keywords

Conceptualization, Artificial intelligence, Adaptation to Climate Change in Agriculture, Economics, FOS: Political science, vulnerability, synergy, adaptation aux changements climatiques, 710, adaptation, policy coherence, Développement agricole, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, forest, Climate change mitigation, Natural resource economics, emission, Climate change, Politique de l'environnement, Business, Environmental resource management, Political science, agriculture, Environmental planning, Utilisation des terres, Global and Planetary Change, Adaptation (eye), Geography, Ecology, Physics, forestry, Life Sciences, Agriculture, [ SDE.MCG ] Environmental Sciences/Global Changes, séquestration du carbone, climate change, Special education, Archaeology, E11 - Economie et politique foncières, réduction des émissions, Physical Sciences, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, Gaz à effet de serre, policy integration, Terre agricole, 330, Mainstreaming, P40 - Météorologie et climatologie, [SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes, Production forestière, Climate change adaptation, Politique de développement, FOS: Law, 333, Adaptive Management, Environmental science, mitigation, E10 - Economie et politique agricoles, resilience, Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Changement climatique, tradeoff, carbon, Optics, Computer science, Déboisement, K10 - Production forestière, Climate Change Impacts on Forest Carbon Sequestration, FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, E14 - Economie et politique du développement, Drivers and Impacts of Tropical Deforestation, Law, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_34841, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_4182, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_331583, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_1374567058134, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_2597, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_1666, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_15590, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_2228, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_2808, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_199, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_3061, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_331597

1 Research products, page 1 of 1

Le Sud face au défi climatique
2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	113
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%