
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Biological treatment of oil and gas produced water: a review and meta-analysis

Biological treatment of oil and gas produced water: a review and meta-analysis
Biological treatment is effective but infrequently used for oil and gas produced water. To date, physical–chemical treatment methods have been favored due to the smaller space requirements and operational simplicity. Changing regulatory requirements and increased interest in recycling and beneficial reuse have led to increased interest in biological treatment. To elucidate its potential role, we reviewed and summarized 59 studies on the biological treatment of produced water. Oilfield produced water was predominantly studied (> 50%). More studies using real produced water were from China than from any other country (37%). Real produced water was used in most studies (73%). Studies were predominantly bench-scale experiments (69%). Fixed-film reactors were most prevalent (27%). Water quality of produced waters treated was variable; median total dissolved solids (TDS) was 28,000 mg L−1 and median chemical oxygen demand (COD) was 1125 mg L−1. Inhibition by salinity was variable according to the treatment system and study design, but efficacy generally decreased when TDS was above 50,000 mg L−1. For studies treating real samples, average COD removal was 73% when TDS was less than 50,000 mg L−1, and 54% when TDS was greater than 50,000 mg L−1. Key issues were microbial acclimation, toxicity, biological fouling, and mineral scaling. Finding an inoculum was not problematic as microorganisms capable of degrading hydrocarbons were isolated from various environments. Treatment performance was better where synthetic produced water was used in lieu of real samples. Biological treatment is promising for producing effluents suitable for reuse, particularly where it functions as part of a larger treatment train.
- Pacific University Oregon United States
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory United States
- Pacific University Oregon United States
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory United States
- University of California System United States
Environmental Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Biological Sciences, Environmental sciences, Biological sciences, Engineering, Clean Water and Sanitation, Oil and gas production, Water reuse and recycling, Biological treatment, Produced water, Environmental Sciences
Environmental Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Biological Sciences, Environmental sciences, Biological sciences, Engineering, Clean Water and Sanitation, Oil and gas production, Water reuse and recycling, Biological treatment, Produced water, Environmental Sciences
10 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2012IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).47 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
