
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A holistic sustainability assessment of organic (certified and non-certified) and non-organic smallholder farms in Kenya

handle: 10419/287333
AbstractThe introduction of organic farm management practices in sub-Saharan Africa could act as a lever for supporting regional sustainable development. In this study, we sought to assess the sustainability performance of organic (certified and non-certified) and non-organic farms in the dry Kajiado County and the wet Murang’a County in Kenya, based on four sustainability dimensions:Good Governance,Environmental Integrity,Economic ResilienceandSocial Well-Being. We collected household survey data from 400 smallholder farms, which were formally characterized into five types (mixed organic and conventional, certified organic, organic, conventional, and subsistence farms). We used multivariate analysis of variance, linear fixed-effects and general linear models to examine differences in sustainability performance. Model results indicate that all farms lack reliable farm management information and that only limited knowledge, skills and social security exist for farmers and farm workers. Comparison of the five farm types indicates no significant differences in their sustainability performance. Nonetheless, certified organic farms had better sustainability performance than non-certified farms due to higher economic resilience, environmental integrity, better support and training for workers. However, except for avoiding the use of agrochemicals in certified farms, there is relatively little difference in the farm management practices across farm types. Our results also indicate that farms in Murang’a were more sustainable than those in Kajiado due to better regional land-tenure security and conflict resolution mechanisms, soil and water conservation measures, and farm commercial viability. Nonetheless, unlike Kajiado, farms in Murang’a showed a tendency toward poor animal husbandry practices which affects overall animal welfare, limited credit uptake and market involvement. The results of this study can support decision making to identify appropriate interventions for improving sustainability in smallholder farms.
- University of Bonn Germany
- Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Belgium
- Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau Switzerland
- Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Belgium
Sustainable Diets and Environmental Impact, Certification, Farm Level Assessment, Economics, Agricultural Innovation and Livelihood Diversification, Evaluation of Environmental Impact in Agriculture, Environmental science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, SAFA guidelines, Indicators, Environmental Chemistry, Recycling, balancing and resource management, Business, Environmental resource management, Biology, Environmental planning, Sub-Saharan Africa, Ecology, Geography, ddc:330, Life Sciences, Management, Values, standards and certification, Sustainability, Agricultural science, FOS: Biological sciences, Africa, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Organic agriculture ; Article ; SAFA guidelines ; Indicators ; Certification ; Sub-Saharan Africa, Organic agriculture, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Sustainable Diets and Environmental Impact, Certification, Farm Level Assessment, Economics, Agricultural Innovation and Livelihood Diversification, Evaluation of Environmental Impact in Agriculture, Environmental science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, SAFA guidelines, Indicators, Environmental Chemistry, Recycling, balancing and resource management, Business, Environmental resource management, Biology, Environmental planning, Sub-Saharan Africa, Ecology, Geography, ddc:330, Life Sciences, Management, Values, standards and certification, Sustainability, Agricultural science, FOS: Biological sciences, Africa, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Organic agriculture ; Article ; SAFA guidelines ; Indicators ; Certification ; Sub-Saharan Africa, Organic agriculture, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).7 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
