
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The 4p1000 initiative: Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy

Climate change adaptation, mitigation and food security may be addressed at the same time by enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration through environmentally sound land management practices. This is promoted by the "4 per 1000" Initiative, a multi-stakeholder platform aiming at increasing SOC storage through sustainable practices. The scientific and technical committee of the Initiative is working to identify indicators, research priorities and region-specific practices needed for their implementation. The Initiative received its name due to the global importance of soils for climate change, which can be illustrated by a thought experiment showing that an annual growth rate of only 0.4% of the standing global SOC stocks would have the potential to counterbalance the current increase in atmospheric CO2. However, there are numerous barriers to the rise in SOC stocks and while SOC sequestration can contribute to partly offsetting greenhouse gas emissions, its main benefits are related to increased soil quality and climate change adaptation. The Initiative provides a collaborative platform for policy makers, practitioners, scientists and stakeholders to engage in finding solutions. Criticism of the Initiative has been related to the poor definition of its numerical target, which was not understood as an aspirational goal. The objective of this paper is to present the aims of the initiative, to discuss critical issues and to present challenges for its implementation. We identify barriers, risks and trade-offs and advocate for collaboration between multiple parties in order to stimulate innovation and to initiate the transition of agricultural systems toward sustainability.
- CGIAR France
- University of Aberdeen United Kingdom
- Laboratoire d'informatique de Paris 6 France
- CGIAR France
- University of California, Davis United States
Carbon sequestration, [SDE] Environmental Sciences, Carbon Sequestration, 330, Life on Land, QH301 Biology, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], 333, 630, soil, QH301, Soil, SDG 13 - Climate Action, Environmental Chemistry, Climate change, SDG 2 - Zero Hunger, agriculture, Planning and Development, Geography, Ecology, soil fertility, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), NE/P019455/1, Agriculture, food security, Food security, Sustainable Development, carbon sequestration, Carbon, Climate Action, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], climate change, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, ecology
Carbon sequestration, [SDE] Environmental Sciences, Carbon Sequestration, 330, Life on Land, QH301 Biology, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], 333, 630, soil, QH301, Soil, SDG 13 - Climate Action, Environmental Chemistry, Climate change, SDG 2 - Zero Hunger, agriculture, Planning and Development, Geography, Ecology, soil fertility, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), NE/P019455/1, Agriculture, food security, Food security, Sustainable Development, carbon sequestration, Carbon, Climate Action, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], climate change, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, ecology
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).268 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
