
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Biomass Energy

Abstract Biomass is the world's fourth largest energy source and the first in developing countries representing 14% and 35%, respectively, of primary energy. The provision and use of biomass energy is a complex issue; it is an integral part of the problems associated with sustainability of all types of vegetation which in turn is a key to ensuring stable socioeconomic development. The financial costs of producing biomass are also very complex since they depend upon many different factors and tend to be quite site specific, eg agricultural and forestry costs, type of feedstock and its productivity, equipment requirements, etc. The last two decades have witnessed numerous proclamations of failure and success of biomass schemes. There is no short cut to trying to understand the factors required for success except by extensive investigation. We consider the socioeconomic and technological implications of four case studies where we have had long-term direct experience of evaluation at the local, national and international levels. These case studies are: ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil and Zimbabwe; community biogas in an Indian village; and, land rehabilitation for fuel and fodder in Baringo, Kenya.
- King's College London United Kingdom
- University of London United Kingdom
- Commonwealth Secretariat United Kingdom
- Commonwealth Secretariat United Kingdom
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).103 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
