
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Application of an integrated systemic framework for analysing agricultural innovation systems and informing innovation policies: Comparing the Dutch and Scottish agrifood sectors

handle: 10182/7923
Innovation is receiving increased attention among policymakers as a means of addressing sustainable economic development challenges. However, a range of factors such as inappropriate physical and knowledge infrastructures, incoherence of institutional frameworks, or lack of specific capabilities may have a negative impact on the functioning of the agricultural innovation system. The purpose of this paper is to apply a comprehensive innovation systems analytical framework, reconciling analyses of systemic structures, functions, failures and merits of innovation systems to assess and compare the performance of the agricultural innovation systems of Scotland and the Netherlands. To achieve this an analytical framework was drawn up based on the available literature, and through a process that included document analysis and a series of semi-structured interviews and workshops with experts in the two countries the agrifood sectors were empirically assessed. In both countries, systemic failures in terms of actors’ interactions and competencies as well as market and incentive structures were revealed. However, differences emerge between the two countries that appear to relate more to social and cultural (soft institutions) differences rather than the formal legal and regulatory frameworks (hard institutions)
- Lincoln University New Zealand
- Scotland's Rural College United Kingdom
- Scotland's Rural College United Kingdom
- Wageningen University & Research Netherlands
- University College Dublin Ireland
knowledge, services, ANZSRC::150307 Innovation and Technology Management, ANZSRC::30 Agricultural, ANZSRC::140201 Agricultural Economics, veterinary and food sciences, 339, fragmentation, systemic failures, agrifood sector, extension, sustainability, networks, ANZSRC::070108 Sustainable Agricultural Development, ANZSRC::41 Environmental sciences, technology, instruments, agricultural innovation systems, structural-functional analysis, ethiopia, management
knowledge, services, ANZSRC::150307 Innovation and Technology Management, ANZSRC::30 Agricultural, ANZSRC::140201 Agricultural Economics, veterinary and food sciences, 339, fragmentation, systemic failures, agrifood sector, extension, sustainability, networks, ANZSRC::070108 Sustainable Agricultural Development, ANZSRC::41 Environmental sciences, technology, instruments, agricultural innovation systems, structural-functional analysis, ethiopia, management
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).120 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
