
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) for rapid determination of biochemical methane potential of plant biomass

Abstract Determination of biochemical methane potential (BMP) by fermentation tests is time-consuming and costly, and therefore not useful for operators of full-scale biogas digesters. A great advantage of NIRS in determining BMP is the reduction in measurement time from at least one month for chemical determination to a couple of minutes for production of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) spectra. An innovative NIRS method that can be used as an alternative to current BMP tests was developed in this study. We tested the Partial Least Squares (PLS) model for a rapid determination of BMP using NIRS by applying a series of pre-processing methods with caution. A total of 88 plant biomass samples of a wide variety were used for model prediction. The standard error of the best PLS model was 37 CH 4 NL kg −1 VS, where BMP of the test set was between 136.2 and 477.9 CH 4 NL kg −1 VS. Coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) and residual prediction deviation (RPD) were 0.84 and 2.49, respectively. This shows that the new NIRS model is moderately successful in application and could be an alternative modern tool to overcome the problems of current BMP methods.
- Aarhus University Denmark
- University of Southern Denmark Denmark
Predicting BMP, Anaerobic digestion, Multivariate data analysis, Biogas production
Predicting BMP, Anaerobic digestion, Multivariate data analysis, Biogas production
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).56 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
