
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Fuel sensitivity of biomass cookstove performance

Fuel sensitivity of biomass cookstove performance
Abstract In this study, a pyrolysis biomass cookstove with separate combustion and pyrolysis chambers (two-chamber stove) is investigated and compared to a widely-used char producing cookstove design (top-lit updraft, TLUD). The influence of pyrolysis fuel type (pellets of hardwood, corn stover, or switchgrass) on CO, NO, CO2 and particulate emissions, and the time dependence of particulate size distribution are quantified. Water boiling tests are conducted in a hood with pine wood as the combustion fuel for the two-chamber stove. Thermal and modified combustion efficiencies, and char yields and elemental compositions are reported. The sensitivity to fuel choice is far lower in the two-chamber stove than in the TLUD, thus making the two-chamber stove design well suited to challenging waste biomass fuels. The NO emission factors are positively related to the nitrogen content of biomass pellets, whereas the particulate emission factor (measured only for the two-chamber stove) follows an order of hardwood
- Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability United States
- State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering China (People's Republic of)
- Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University China (People's Republic of)
- Cornell University United States
- State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering China (People's Republic of)
29 Research products, page 1 of 3
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2014IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
chevron_left - 1
- 2
- 3
chevron_right
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).28 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
