
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems in waste-heat recovery applications using computer-aided molecular design techniques

handle: 10044/1/65621
Abstract In this paper, we develop a framework for designing optimal organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems that simultaneously considers both thermodynamic and economic objectives. This methodology relies on computer-aided molecular design (CAMD) techniques that allow the identification of an optimal working fluid during the thermo-economic optimization of the system. The SAFT-γ Mie equation of state is used to determine the necessary thermodynamic properties of the designed working fluids, with critical and transport properties estimated using empirical group-contribution methods. The framework is then applied to the design of sub-critical and non-recuperated ORC systems in different applications spanning a range of heat-source temperatures. When minimizing the specific investment cost (SIC) of these systems, it is found that the optimal molecular size of the working fluid is linked to the heat-source temperature, as expected, but also that the introduction of a minimum pinch point constraint that is commonly employed to account for inherent trade-offs between system performance and cost is not necessary. The optimal SICs of waste-heat ORC systems with heat-source temperatures of 150 °C, 250 °C and 350 °C are £10120, £4040 and £2910 per kW, when employing propane, 2-butane and 2-heptene as the working fluids, respectively. During a set of MINLP optimizations of the ORC systems with heat-source temperatures of 150 °C and 250 °C, it is found that 1,3-butadiene and 4-methyl-2-pentene are the best-performing working fluids, respectively, with SICs of £9640 per kW and £4000 per kW. These substances represent novel working fluids for ORC systems that cannot be determined a priori by specifying any working-fluid family or by following traditional methods of testing multiple fluids. Interestingly, the same molecules are identified in a multi-objective optimization considering both the total investment cost and net power output. These findings highlight the power of this approach as it enables the selection of novel working fluids while optimizing ORC systems using single or multiple thermo-economic performance indicators.
- Imperial College London United Kingdom
Technology, Engineering, Chemical, Computer-aided molecular design (CAMD), Energy & Fuels, Chemical, Organic Rankine cycle, 09 Engineering, CONDENSATION, Engineering, Thermo-economic, LOW-GRADE HEAT, Waste heat recovery, 14 Economics, Science & Technology, Energy, GENERAL CORRELATION, PRESSURES, DYNAMIC-MODEL, MULTIPARAMETER CORRELATION, PERFORMANCE, 620, Multi-objective optimization, CONVERSION, WORKING FLUID SELECTION, Working fluids, VISCOSITY
Technology, Engineering, Chemical, Computer-aided molecular design (CAMD), Energy & Fuels, Chemical, Organic Rankine cycle, 09 Engineering, CONDENSATION, Engineering, Thermo-economic, LOW-GRADE HEAT, Waste heat recovery, 14 Economics, Science & Technology, Energy, GENERAL CORRELATION, PRESSURES, DYNAMIC-MODEL, MULTIPARAMETER CORRELATION, PERFORMANCE, 620, Multi-objective optimization, CONVERSION, WORKING FLUID SELECTION, Working fluids, VISCOSITY
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).87 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
