
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Economic analysis of grid integration of variable solar and wind power with conventional power system

Abstract Variable renewable electricity (VRE) is expected to play an important role in global decarbonization. However, due to VRE’s intermittency and uncertainty, integrating VRE into the power system may cause additional integration costs for both power systems and consumers. Estimating these integration costs can provide insights for power system planning, support policy making and power market designs. In this paper, the integration costs of wind and solar on both demand and supply sides are quantitatively investigated by an economic power dispatch model combined with Monte Carlo simulation. A case study of Guangdong Province in China is conducted under three scenarios of power mix changes (only increasing the VRE installation; replacing the existing coal-fired power; and replacing the existing coal-fired power without power storage). The results show that integration costs from both supply and demand sides are non-negligible when VRE replaces existing capacity, and the costs are increasing with the penetration rate of VRE. On supply side, it ranges from −2.3 to 12.1 $/MWh for wind penetration from 5% to 30%, and −5.5 to 7.1 $/MWh for that of solar penetration. Moreover, consumers on demand side will bear −7.3 to 185.9 $/MWh integration costs for wind and solar integration, which is much higher than the supply side. In addition, solar power has a lower integration cost than wind power due to a more consistent power output with the load curve of power demand on the time scale. Moreover, our results reveal that blindly reducing the renewable energy curtailment rate may not be cost-effective.
- Tsinghua University China (People's Republic of)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences China (People's Republic of)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences China (People's Republic of)
- Beihang University China (People's Republic of)
- Institutes of Science and Development China (People's Republic of)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).57 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
