Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Applied Energyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Applied Energy
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Dual-effect single-mixed refrigeration cycle: An innovative alternative process for energy-efficient and cost-effective natural gas liquefaction

Authors: Moonyong Lee; Kinza Qadeer; Sanggyu Lee; Tianbiao He; Ning Mao; Muhammad Abdul Qyyum;

Dual-effect single-mixed refrigeration cycle: An innovative alternative process for energy-efficient and cost-effective natural gas liquefaction

Abstract

Abstract Typical liquefaction processes are considered to be energy and cost-intensive. The dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) process (with two independent refrigeration cycles for cooling and subcooling) produces liquefied natural gas (LNG) at relatively high energy efficiency. However, it exhibits a high degree of configurational complexity and high sensitivity to operational conditions, and it also incurs a large capital investment. These factors eventually reduce the overall competitiveness of the liquefaction process, particularly for offshore applications. To address these issues, an energy- and cost-efficient dual-effect single mixed refrigerant (DSMR) process is proposed herein, and it employs a single loop refrigeration cycle to generate the dual cooling and subcooling effect, separately. The DMR process and the proposed DSMR process are simulated (with same design parameters) using well-known commercial simulator Aspen Hysys v10. Then, both processes are optimized using modified coordinate descent algorithm. The specific energy consumption of DSMR is 0.284 kWh/kg-NG, which is equivalent to an energy saving of 22.89% when compared to the conventional DMR process. The exergy efficiency of DSMR is 36.62%, which is 29.67% higher than that of the classical DMR process. Furthermore, the economic feasibility of the proposed DSMR process is evaluated in terms of its total annualized cost, which is 18.52% lower than that of the DMR process. Thus, the proposed DSMR process offers remarkable energy and exergy efficiencies with minimal capital investment. Therefore, DSMR could replace the classical DMR process, as well as other complex mixed refrigerant-based liquefaction processes.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    53
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
53
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%