Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Applied Energyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Applied Energy
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Meta-analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure in last decade: Identification of synergistic effect and optimization synergy range

Authors: Yuanhui Zhang; Yuanhui Zhang; Jialiang Zhou; Na Duan; Benyamin Khoshnevisan;

Meta-analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure in last decade: Identification of synergistic effect and optimization synergy range

Abstract

Abstract The anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of organic substrates has reportedly shown synergistic effects, but the current indices used to evaluate the magnitude of such effects cannot well support the findings and in some cases bring about confusion. In this paper, meta-analysis was performed through a database compiled from 124 peer-reviewed articles focused on the AcoD of livestock manure. Six commonly used indices for evaluating synergistic effects were statistically analyzed in order to obtain a representative evaluation index. Moreover, the synergy intervals of substrate mixing were preliminarily analyzed on element and molecular levels using the optimized index. The results indicated that the ratio of experimental values to weighted values is a relatively optimized evaluation index. Methane production and organic degradation were found to be two independent indices, thus both of them should be considered simultaneously when AcoD process is under consideration. From a statistical standpoint, the recommended synergy interval of carbon-nitrogen ratio is 20–27. A higher probability of synergy can be achieved when the lipid/carbohydrate ratio is higher than 0.13, as well as the protein/carbohydrate ratio is greater than 0.26. Moreover, a relatively complete execution strategy of AcoD has been preliminarily proposed in terms of selection of co-substrate, mixing ratio, and synergy evaluation. The results achieved herein would have some biases and uncertainties due to the fact that only few studies explicitly demonstrated carbohydrate forms, especially lignin. Therefore, the evaluated indices should be further verified and improved by including more details about carbohydrate forms.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%