
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure

Abstract The methane productivity of manure in terms of volatile solids (VS), volume and livestock production was determined. The theoretical methane productivity is higher in pig (516 l kg −1 VS ) and sow (530 l kg −1 VS ) manure than in dairy cattle manure (469 l kg −1 VS ) , while the ultimate methane yield in terms of VS is considerably higher in pig (356 l kg −1 VS ) and sow manure (275 l kg −1 VS ) than in dairy cattle manure (148 l kg −1 VS ) . Methane productivity based on livestock units (LU) shows the lowest methane productivity for sows (165 m 3 CH 4 LU −1 ) , while the other animal categories are in the same range (282– 301 m 3 CH 4 LU −1 ). Pre-treatment of manure by separation is a way of making fractions of the manure that have a higher gas potential per volume. Theoretical methane potential and biodegradability of three types of fractions deriving from manure separation were tested. The volumetric methane yield of straw was found to be higher than the yield from total manure and the solid fractions of manure, due to the higher VS content, and hence the use of straw as bedding material will increase the volumetric as well as the livestock-based methane productivity.
- Technical University of Denmark Denmark
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).546 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 0.1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
