
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Comparison of deep learning models for multivariate prediction of time series wind power generation and temperature

handle: 10037/18574 , 10419/243998
Wind power experienced a substantial growth over the past decade especially because it has been seen as one of the best ways towards meeting climate change and emissions targets by many countries. Since wind power is not fully dispatchable, the accuracy of wind forecasts is a key element for the electric system operators, as it strongly affects the decision-making processes. The planning horizon can be short term (1 -3 months) and long-term (6–12 months) depending on the process.The objective of this paper is to conduct a performance comparison of five deep learning models each combined with three types of data pre-processing and used for short term and long-term multi-variate predictions. The input data are time series of the wind power capacity factor and the temperature. In addition, this paper sets out to demonstrate and review the state-of-the-art deep learning models for prediction with a secondary objective to present the reader a reference point to better understand which model to choose and what factors are significant. The first contribution of this paper is to apply, assess and compare a selection of the novel and cutting-edge deep learning models for multi-variate prediction. Multi-variate predication is achieved through a proposed multiple input and multiple output (MIMO) architecture. Compared to traditional prediction models, machine learning techniques have the advantage of generalization. Among various techniques deep learning is particularly getting more attention due to the applicability to various dataset such as numerical and character. This investigation focuses on five models — Deep Feed Forward (DFF), Deep Convolutional Network (DCN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Attention mechanism (Attention) and Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTM). The second contribution is to propose a novel approach to transform the time series dataset to signal for input and reconstruct the model predictions through inverse transformation, by means of the so-called discrete wavelet transformation and fast Fourier transformation. The different models are assessed also by comparing their performance with and without the input dataset manipulation through wavelet and FFT transformation. Beyond that, the model performances are outlined in detail, to give the reader an overview of the models to choose from for short-term or long-term prediction. The results demonstrate that the Attention and DCN perform best with Wavelet or FFT signal, whereas some other models perform better with no data preprocessing. Keywords: Unsupervised machine learning, Multi-variate prediction, Short and long term prediction, Wind power forecasting, Time series to frequency transformation, Performance evaluation and comparison
- The Arctic University of Norway Norway
- Tallinn University of Technology Estonia
Short and long term prediction, Time series to frequency transformation, ddc:330, VDP::Technology: 500, Wind power forecasting, TK1-9971, VDP::Teknologi: 500, Multi-variate prediction, Performance evaluation and comparison, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, Unsupervised machine learning
Short and long term prediction, Time series to frequency transformation, ddc:330, VDP::Technology: 500, Wind power forecasting, TK1-9971, VDP::Teknologi: 500, Multi-variate prediction, Performance evaluation and comparison, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, Unsupervised machine learning
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).46 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
